i have nothing against you at all carringbush.....but you have been saying why did we change game plan from 2018 because it worked well....and it did but only because players like sier, de goey, stephenson, whe, JT had best years...it was an outlier year but the quick ball movement is how a classy team should play....i wouldn't think our list has the talent to do that again because the list is full of fit battlers who aren't blessed with any special talent....maybe buckley's vision was to build a blue collar list to swarm and bring pressure....but to my eyes it is ugly stuff, almost like the sydney days when they only existed to strangle teams....and you have been often claiming some or many players are not being developed to maximum potential....i am not sure how you could even possibly know that....what if they are just legitimate hacks as i claim...
That's exactly what Nathan did, that was his plan, build a grunt team and play a swarm and spread game to outnumber in the contest AND on the outside on the ball win.
Your view that all of those players had outlier seasons is fair speculation, it's also fair speculation they could emulate it again. That is up for debate - I'm just of the view and you seem to state the same, even in this post, that our current game is not optimizing the players on the list we do have. Regardless of how good / bad it is.
How wrong or right I'm in that I don't know, I'm speculating, y'know it's forum to contribute opinions
Seems you're of the view the list is a bottom 6 type and is need of a rebuild, I'd argue it needs a reno, never stated the list does not need addressing. Which is also your speculation, unless of course you have inside info or are some sort of footy list / development guru. Are you?