Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 7 - Pride Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
but why??? surely Brisbane would not get better than what you suggest and if they do not like it, number one Ashcroft.We gave up too much
should only have been 42,43,45,51
Then we should have just taken #42 out and included #51There must have been a reason why we gave 32 in this pick swap as well. Surely we aren’t that stupid.
Maybe lions needed more points for something. Still good to recycle the garbage picks anyway.
Instead of Baker, let's make it Short, they can have pick 20 to sweeten the deal (we don't need anything in return, getting rid of Shorty is all we need out of the deal)Actually see Baker Short and Graham running laps at Princess Park so yeah good mates
Then we should have just taken #42 out and included #51
Makes no sense to throw an extra 2nd rounder into a deal where the lions could not have gotten better specially with Richmond not bidding on Ashcroft.
Not to mention the offers #39 , #42 , #42 would have received on draft night
very strange why Richmond would just hand over 300-400 points extra
if others get it we select AShcroft number one for another 500 point whammy. remember Fagan said younger Ashcroft is coming to Brisbane so they have already locked it inYou know what I just realised. Other clubs would’ve been bidding on it. That’s the surplus points it took to get a first round pick in this draft.
There's no real difference between 42 43 and 45. The first 2 will disappear after the Lions bid on Ashcroft anyway. I'm annoyed we didn't keep 45 and trade 51 instead.Then we should have just taken #42 out and included #51
Makes no sense to throw an extra 2nd rounder into a deal where the lions could not have gotten better specially with Richmond not bidding on Ashcroft.
Not to mention the offers #39 , #42 , #42 would have received on draft night
very strange why Richmond would just hand over 300-400 points extra
if others get it we select AShcroft number one for another 500 point whammy. remember Fagan said younger Ashcroft is coming to Brisbane so they have already locked it in
trade ethics, yeah right, tell me when you visit the real worldMaybe that’s not trade ethics. Whatever the reason RFC aren’t dumb. This is the best we could’ve gotten and I’d rather it over what we had despite the points value.
They're going to lose 13 & 23 with the bid on Lombard so will trade them out for some more points this year but also have to trade in F1's for bids on their academy players next year.Maybe we are already in discussion with GC about trading that F1 along with Rioli for #6 + #13
this is coming when we hit the spoonFMD … we gave 32 and some junk picks for pick-20 in a draft people are giving their first borns to be involved in and we are melting …
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
trade ethics, yeah right, tell me when you visit the real world
6&10 or 6&11 might do it
And I’d definitely consider it
Exactly, and who knows, maybe there was an offer that we had to trump, so many things going on in the background that we're unaware of.FMD … we gave 32 and some junk picks for pick-20 in a draft people are giving their first borns to be involved in and we are melting …
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
your trade partners get sacked and replaced.North could’ve gotten Coleman-Jones for free in the rookie draft by not making a deal with us. But they didn’t and gave us a pick.
Trade ethics is a thing like in the real world. You don’t want to piss off your trade partners in the future because you might need them.
your trade partners get sacked and replaced.
Blair is carrying on like a career politician but no business wants to poach him
thats right we should have got pick nine instead of pick 20 which means access to better players and trades and it was posted on BF to and Hawthorn and CFC have since traded between themselvesPoints don’t mean shit. This years pick one is worth the same as last years which nabbed WCE Harley Reid. Points mean shit. It’s the player that is available at the points that count
The PSD isn't a threat. Even if they go through with it we just pick up Baker again with our first pick.We are in a way lucky that Freo also have interest in Baker. The PSD option or a lesser trade would become a lot more real without the competition for his services
So why did CFC not chase Blair Hartley when Wright known for his trading efforts???So why didn’t North let CCJ go the rookie draft?
In this Lions trade do you think RFC are stupid and don’t know how to use addition and a draft point calc?
These people do it for a living, there is a reason why it turned out like it did.
If it was as that bad we wouldn’t have done the trade.