List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency - Fred 11

[_RT_]

 

[sregit]

we still have hopper, taranto & prestia (for at least a third of the season) to protect & be workhorses in the seniors, bleak outside of that, hopefully mcauliffe gets ahead of dow though

just means there's room for draftees that earn a call up

or it means there's room for the worst train-on player we've ever seen taking games from draftees

You do know that train on players can also be from outside that AFL? Ie players overlooked in the draft. WAFL, SAFL etc. Lefau was one. They are not all duds.

 

[tiger_tough]

We must be similar age. I'm 39. Fond memories of seeing them around the place (Motel, Wax/Traffic, Billboards etc!)

Yep. Used to get munted at Billboards on the reg when I was 18/19.

 

[Morro]

Yep. Used to get munted at Billboards on the reg when I was 18/19.

still munted or?

 

[tigs2010]

Yep. Used to get munted at Billboards on the reg when I was 18/19.

 

[tiger_tough]

still munted or?

Fresh as a daisy.

 

[tiger_tough]

Still wear my hat inside too, and at the dinner table. Old campaigner.

 

[Dr Tigris]

All these clubs are starting to panic that they are out of or don't have many picks in the deep draft.



I disagree to a lot on here, next year's draft is going to be heavily compromised. Our first pick will be fine, but 2nd round picks will be like a 3rd rounder. I hate the thought of trading in F2 picks. Even future round 1's I'd be cautious of.

2nd rounders will be worth points to clubs that need them next year. If we can slide in our picks this year for F2's, then we can trade in to better picks either in 2025 or 2026.

 

[sanaya]

You do know that train on players can also be from outside that AFL? Ie players overlooked in the draft. WAFL, SAFL etc. Lefau was one. They are not all duds.

 

[Danog]

4th round next year has no points.

Ours might, if it moves in.

 

[sregit]

Ours might, if it moves in.

How does a fourth round in 2025 move in?

 

[4tune8]

How does a fourth round in 2025 move in?

After bids are paid for on 6 Academy picks

 

[THE_GUN]

2nd rounders will be worth points to clubs that need them next year. If we can slide in our picks this year for F2's, then we can trade in to better picks either in 2025 or 2026.

F2's are totally useless to Richmond and no point trading out any of our current picks for F2's as they would be starting from 30

Why trade out of this draft into next year for a similar pick , Just crazy
Has to be F1 picks for 20 , 23 , 24 for Richmond to even consider a trade

 

[Calcium Man]

F2's are totally useless to Richmond and no point trading out any of our current picks for F2's as they would be starting from 30

Why trade out of this draft into next year for a similar pick , Just crazy
Has to be F1 picks for 20 , 23 , 24 for Richmond to even consider a trade

Disagree, with reduction in draft points and smaller discount the academy teams will want more 2nds instead of 40s and 50s picks when sliding back.

GC already have 3 first round picks for next year with 1 maybe 2 top 5 talents they’ll want a bunch of 2nds to pay for them.

That being said would still prefer 1st, just think with all the potential academy and father/sons next year teams will want points and as they don’t go as far to move up you’ll need higher ones than this year.

 

[richoplzbreed]

Let's see how hard their draw is. They'll be the only top 6 team that plays us and West Coast twice.

Couldn't see the AFL being that blatant. Top 6 teams play bottom 6 teams a minimum 1 and maximum 2 times. They wouldn't dare give them the maximum games against the 2 bottom teams no less. The rare unbiased media would point that out, let alone the angry talk back callers

 

[Dr Tigris]

F2's are totally useless to Richmond and no point trading out any of our current picks for F2's as they would be starting from 30

Why trade out of this draft into next year for a similar pick , Just crazy
Has to be F1 picks for 20 , 23 , 24 for Richmond to even consider a trade

To be traded for points with the teams requiring them for FS and Academy players. And for us sliding a few spots to pick up someone we rate equally. Like we did last year. Might get another 1st doing that, for no draft disadvantage.

 

[Coach_Required]

F2's are totally useless to Richmond and no point trading out any of our current picks for F2's as they would be starting from 30

Why trade out of this draft into next year for a similar pick , Just crazy
Has to be F1 picks for 20 , 23 , 24 for Richmond to even consider a trade

Yep, its why i laugh at North fan talking like we might want to trade our lower picks out for a F2 with them lol

 

[THE_GUN]

Yep, its why i laugh at North fan talking like we might want to trade our lower picks out for a F2 with them lol

Dont laugh at Norf fans mate they are mentally challenged humans with issue's
Just give them a hug

 

[Coach_Required]

Dont laugh at Norf fans mate they are mentally challenged humans with issue's
Just give them a hug

It's tough work, we only just got rid of all the Freo & West Coast nuffies. Now we are apparently handing our picks over to the AFL's biggest charity case.

 

[THE_GUN]

It's tough work, we only just got rid of all the Freo & West Coast nuffies. Now we are apparently handing our picks over to the AFL's biggest charity case.

1 of these poor souls posted

" If we had Richmond's draft hand this trade our rebuild would just about be complete"

 

[KrispyKreme]

I mean pick 2 and a F1st for 6&11 isn’t a reach. Ideally we’d be getting a pick next year lower than pick 11 back in return.

So the way I see it as next year isn’t deep but that also doesn’t mean the talent from 1-8 is bad. It’s just not 1-30 good.
So Richmond may use pick 1 and package up the north pick and get Archie Luwodyke who may explode being the number 1 option.

 

[JR82]

Imagine when we are kicking 4 or 5 goals a week next year

no different to the mid part of this yr

 

[THE_GUN]

I mean pick 2 and a F1st for 6&11 isn’t a reach. Ideally we’d be getting a pick next year lower than pick 11 back in return.

So the way I see it as next year isn’t deep but that also doesn’t mean the talent from 1-8 is bad. It’s just not 1-30 good.
So Richmond may use pick 1 and package up the north pick and get Archie Luwodyke who may explode being the number 1 option.

NorF are not trading #2 + F1 for #6 + #11
Thats as delusional as their thoughts on the NorF board

 

[KrispyKreme]

NorF are not trading #2 + F1 for #6 + #11
Thats as delusional as their thoughts on the NorF board

Well then if anything they get 6 & 18 or 20
You can’t have two first round picks and not expect the same in return especially if it’s to move 4 places we aren’t talking about pick 12/14 here…

 

[Sir_Loin]

Disagree, with reduction in draft points and smaller discount the academy teams will want more 2nds instead of 40s and 50s picks when sliding back.

GC already have 3 first round picks for next year with 1 maybe 2 top 5 talents they’ll want a bunch of 2nds to pay for them.

That being said would still prefer 1st, just think with all the potential academy and father/sons next year teams will want points and as they don’t go as far to move up you’ll need higher ones than this year.

Why doesn’t our academy produce kids like this

Oh that’s right we don’t have one

 

[Fl4wlessLogic]

Anybody reckon we pick up Membrey in the PSD? Should be good to cover the kids and heard Pies are interested in him. We could legit prevent them winning a flag lol