- Sep 22, 2011
- 20,319
- 72,992
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Alright mate. Think what you like.
My god, I remember you with Rance apparently now signing. I could just picture the below was you when he re signed lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Alright mate. Think what you like.
Forecasting past next season never seems to pan out very wellThe List Manager just had the final word on the issue. Said that Richmond's list is better suited to win a premiership in the next year or two whilst Collingwood's list is well placed for the future.
I think that's a fair analysis and any bickering should cease.
So true, many had Port Adelaide playing off for the flag and look how that worked out.Forecasting past next season never seems to pan out very well
Most struggle to predict next years ladder very well, so looking 2+ years ahead is just stabbing in the dark.
Look at how many thought Melbourne were ahead of Richmond only a couple of years ago.
there's plenty of ifs, buts , hopes and maybes in black and white champ , as they say in the classics, shit in one hand , hope in the other, see which ones full first , we ve put the runs on the board that we re a genuine finals outfit , no illusions there, our AA core will all be fronting up again in 2016, worse luck for you campaignersThe List Manager just had the final word on the issue. Said that Richmond's list is better suited to win a premiership in the next year or two whilst Collingwood's list is well placed for the future.
I think that's a fair analysis and any bickering should cease.
Just like Eddie McGuire the broadcaster and Eddie McGuire the Collingwood president are two different personalitiespeople need to realise that KB the media personality and Kevin Bartlett the Richmond Immortal are 2 separate personalities
+1, I advise all aspiring young trolls to try to emulate KB, he is the best in the business. He even looks a little bit like one imo.You do realise that KB trolls everyone just to generate talk back right? He is deliberately inflammatory.
It's reasonable to reinforce the point that no disconnect exists between Wallet's position and Treloar's. That is, Richmond might have a better chance of winning in the next 1-2 seasons, but on account of his young age, Collingwood is a better fit in medium as he hits his peak in a year or two. Clearly what was what Treloar was meaning to say, this is just an offseason media beat up.The List Manager just had the final word on the issue. Said that Richmond's list is better suited to win a premiership in the next year or two whilst Collingwood's list is well placed for the future.
I think that's a fair analysis and any bickering should cease.
Seriously? I would of thought that going into 2016 Richmond has at least as much to prove as Collingwood if not more.there's plenty of ifs, buts , hopes and maybes in black and white champ , as they say in the classics, shit in one hand , hope in the other, see which ones full first , we ve put the runs on the board that we re a genuine finals outfit , no illusions there, our AA core will all be fronting up again in 2016, worse luck for you campaigners
We have the same age profiles.It's reasonable to reinforce the point that no disconnect exists between Wallet's position and Treloar's. That is, Richmond might have a better chance of winning in the next 1-2 seasons, but on account of his young age, Collingwood is a better fit in medium as he hits his peak in a year or two. Clearly what was what Treloar was meaning to say, this is just an offseason media beat up.
So now he will win Collingwood a flag off his own boot? This kid just gets dumber by the minute.It's reasonable to reinforce the point that no disconnect exists between Wallet's position and Treloar's. That is, Richmond might have a better chance of winning in the next 1-2 seasons, but on account of his young age, Collingwood is a better fit in medium as he hits his peak in a year or two. Clearly what was what Treloar was meaning to say, this is just an offseason media beat up.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-11-19/i-never-once-had-a-dig-at-richmond-treloarWe have the same age profiles.
Which means Treloar is just a moron. Case closed.
"In what could be seen as a partial retraction, but stopping short of an apology, the 22-year-old passionately implored the footy public not to judge him as a person."
Same bloke thought Richmonds list was closer to a flag than Hawthorns back in 2004.The List Manager just had the final word on the issue. Said that Richmond's list is better suited to win a premiership in the next year or two whilst Collingwood's list is well placed for the future.
I think that's a fair analysis and any bickering should cease.
That's a bit simplistic isn't it? Age profiles aren't indicative of young talent and most observers admit that Collingwood are in the top 2-3 clubs in the comp in that department. I haven't heard much about Richmond's young stocks at all which is probably an indicator of where its at.We have the same age profiles.
Which means Treloar is just a moron. Case closed.
Because you're a one eyed bias Collingwood supporter, duh. Your team can't make finals so the only thing your propaganda machine can do is pump up your youth to sell the message to the fans that success is on it's way. It might be, who knows, but I know our team doesn't have to push the "youth" message.That's a bit simplistic isn't it? Age profiles aren't indicative of young talent and most observers admit that Collingwood are in the top 2-3 clubs in the comp in that department. I haven't heard much about Richmond's young stocks at all which is probably an indicator of where its at.
Even if that is what he meant. What is wrong with calling it how he sees it. It's clear that his perception of Collingwood's list was a key factor in his decision. Why does he have to keep mum on something that is patently obvious so as to not to upset a few jaded Richmond people."In what could be seen as a partial retraction, but stopping short of an apology, the 22-year-old passionately implored the footy public not to judge him as a person."
Alright, I shall judge him as a calf. In this is he is still a flog.
That's a bit simplistic isn't it? Age profiles aren't indicative of young talent and most observers admit that Collingwood are in the top 2-3 clubs in the comp in that department. I haven't heard much about Richmond's young stocks at all which is probably an indicator of where its at.
Or it could be because our club has accumulated a lot more first round draft picks in recent years than Richmond and most (perhaps all) other top 8 clubs.Because you're a one eyed bias Collingwood supporter, duh. Your team can't make finals so the only thing your propaganda machine can do is pump up your youth to sell the message to the fans that success is on it's way. It might be, who knows, but I know our team doesn't have to push the "youth" message.
Same bloke who said essendon's list was the next best after hawthorn and sydney.Same bloke thought Richmonds list was closer to a flag than Hawthorns back in 2004.