- Sep 10, 2006
- 20,982
- 23,030
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC
Because O'Loughlin and Hall are nearing the end of their careers and we lack good, young KP prostects for the future.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Trade Talk
- Thread starter bleeding red and white
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Because O'Loughlin and Hall are nearing the end of their careers and we lack good, young KP prostects for the future.
HBF
Flying Scotsman
- Sep 24, 2002
- 156,228
- 101,329
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Think you'll find he'll a heap more time in the Geelong team next year, rather than kicking the due off the ground with their reserves side.
Re: Andrew Lovett?
Why in every trade thread I am reading people are saying "Sydney have shown interest, real interest in Lovett" or "The Swans are really keen on Lovett?"
Are we (as in the club, not us on BF) genuinely interested? Has there been anything in the media to state we have spoken to him?
Why in every trade thread I am reading people are saying "Sydney have shown interest, real interest in Lovett" or "The Swans are really keen on Lovett?"
Are we (as in the club, not us on BF) genuinely interested? Has there been anything in the media to state we have spoken to him?
Re: Andrew Lovett?
There was a post, I think by a North supporter,* which summarised Andrew Ireland's appearance on Healy's show on 3AW.
We are interested in Lovett, but not Ray.
We are happy with our ruck situation.
Expects Hall to stay.
We are chasing Kerr, but difficult to meet WCE's demands.
* I had a look in this thread, but I couldn't find it.
EDIT
roowatch's report of Ireland appearance;
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12591162&postcount=58
Andrew Ireland was on 3AW this afternoon:
B Hall: Most likely to stay, almost guaranteed that Hall would stay in Sydney
R O'Keefe: Believed last week that they had his signature. Intimated that ROK had a change of mind. Seemed less sure of ability to get ROK to stay. Also out of contract unlike Hall. (methinks that if they lost ROK, it would provide the Swans with the stuff by which they could a deal for Kerr)
N.Davis: Would assess after trade week if still on list
D.Kerr: Very interesred but are pretty sure that Kerr will stay at WC
A.Lovett: Are interested
F.Ray: No, don't think he is what they want
Generally: Likely to be busy during trade week, but won't be unhappy kep players and are likely to only use 3 or 4 picks after a few rookie promotions
Oh, not after a ruckman. Have told youngsters (?) that they will have the chance to be the support for Jolly next year. (Currie I know of and Ireland mentioned him, but who else? Orreal - a long way back I would have thought)
There was a post, I think by a North supporter,* which summarised Andrew Ireland's appearance on Healy's show on 3AW.
We are interested in Lovett, but not Ray.
We are happy with our ruck situation.
Expects Hall to stay.
We are chasing Kerr, but difficult to meet WCE's demands.
* I had a look in this thread, but I couldn't find it.
EDIT
roowatch's report of Ireland appearance;
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12591162&postcount=58
Andrew Ireland was on 3AW this afternoon:
B Hall: Most likely to stay, almost guaranteed that Hall would stay in Sydney
R O'Keefe: Believed last week that they had his signature. Intimated that ROK had a change of mind. Seemed less sure of ability to get ROK to stay. Also out of contract unlike Hall. (methinks that if they lost ROK, it would provide the Swans with the stuff by which they could a deal for Kerr)
N.Davis: Would assess after trade week if still on list
D.Kerr: Very interesred but are pretty sure that Kerr will stay at WC
A.Lovett: Are interested
F.Ray: No, don't think he is what they want
Generally: Likely to be busy during trade week, but won't be unhappy kep players and are likely to only use 3 or 4 picks after a few rookie promotions
Oh, not after a ruckman. Have told youngsters (?) that they will have the chance to be the support for Jolly next year. (Currie I know of and Ireland mentioned him, but who else? Orreal - a long way back I would have thought)
^^Cheers Wadey, hope we don't give up too much if we do land him.
- Banned
- #609
Lovett plus 3rd rounder for your 1st rounder?
- Banned
- #610
How about we give you our 1st rounder just to keep Lovett ?
More like our second and third rounders for Lovett and your third rounder.
Lmao you're always good for a laugh.
- Banned
- #613
- Banned
- #614
Hello Dud.
Straight swap of 1st rounder would be great but unlikely as it would be slightly overpaying for Lovett. Hence why I threw in our 3rd rounder. Hoping to get an extra 1st rounder to perhaps snare Trengrove.
I know Lovett plus Hislop would get the deal done instantly but I would not do that for your 1st rounder. Hislop is a former top 20 pick from 2006 superdraft. Has ben injured (what's new
) and has queries over his attitude. We may well be looking to trade him. Tough inside mid. Steady pace, not express but certainly has grunt.
- Banned
- #615
freo board is a few boards up matey.
eagles4spoon
Draftee
With ROK looking to move back to VIC, D. Kerr would be a fitting trade to come to sydney with someone like R. Shaw and 2nd pick to WC.
so...
Kerr > Sydney
O'Keefe > Collingwood
R.Shaw + 2nd round pick > West coast
so...
Kerr > Sydney
O'Keefe > Collingwood
R.Shaw + 2nd round pick > West coast
- Banned
- #617
- Banned
- #618
Hello Dud.
Straight swap of 1st rounder would be great but unlikely as it would be slightly overpaying for Lovett. Hence why I threw in our 3rd rounder. Hoping to get an extra 1st rounder to perhaps snare Trengrove.
I know Lovett plus Hislop would get the deal done instantly but I would not do that for your 1st rounder. Hislop is a former top 20 pick from 2006 superdraft. Has ben injured (what's new
No your confused, we give you our first rounder, you keep the idiot Lovett at Essendon. It is about as likely as the other crap you have suggested.
Lovett has no trade value, you want him off your list to lose his salary from the cap, and lose his bad influence.
Delist him or get a late 2nd or 3rd rounder, simple
- Banned
- #619
Yes I knew what you were insinuating. You just seem to be a fool with nothing much to add other then snide insults. Remember the last time I encountered you on this board?
Lovett has no trade value you say? Lets see what happens come trade week
You then move on to contradict yourself by saying we either delist him or get possibly a pick between 30-35 in this strong draft? I'd say he isnt 'delistable' material if he could net us a pick 30 in YOUR opinion
- Banned
- #620
Yes I knew what you were insinuating. You just seem to be a fool with nothing much to add other then snide insults. Remember the last time I encountered you on this board?
Lovett has no trade value you say? Lets see what happens come trade week
You then move on to contradict yourself by saying we either delist him or get possibly a pick between 30-35 in this strong draft? I'd say he isnt 'delistable' material if he could net us a pick 30 in YOUR opinion
Your a tool, on the wrong board talking crap, get used to it
- Banned
- #623
Are you embarrassed at the stupidity of your previous post?
Just put me on ignore champ. You don't seem to be able to discuss football matters and your petty insults are a waste of time reading.
eagles4spoon
Draftee
given your username you're obviously still bitter about 2006
but that trade is one of the worst ive ever seen -.-
a hack and a 2nd rounder for kerr
and you get kerr for okeefe? ahahahah
nub
The fact is Kerr wants 4/5 year contract, WC arent gonna give it to him and what they are demanding for him... your dreaming!
- Banned
- #625
What? So you were serious with that trade proposal?
- Status
Similar threads
