Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Call me nobody then.Nobody deserves to be a billionaire
Do sportspeople deserve to be billionaires is an interesting conservation.
Per that article someone else posted, Oprah is one as well. That's three, depending on whether you count being a TV presenter as being an artist. There must be others as well.Without googling it I highly doubt Rihanna is a billionaire.
Well, obvious being billionaires shouldn't exist, full stop. But if someone is so good at something, something that isn't DIRECTLY unethical, unless you are so tightly wound you consider accepting contracts getting paid that much unethical, then why shouldn't he?No it isn’t, for obvious reasons.
Well, obvious being billionaires shouldn't exist, full stop. But if someone is so good at something, something that isn't DIRECTLY unethical, unless you are so tightly wound you consider accepting contracts getting paid that much unethical, then why shouldn't he?
And if you suggest there's something wrong with that you're xenophobic apparently lolI mean, look at the Premier League. Lots of 'unclean' money and owners.
Jimmy, welcome to the cliqueNobody deserves to be a billionaire
Surely there's a limit to awareness. Everyone knows. Corporate capitalism doesn't have or want a solutionIt gets attention.
But so would killing some fashies instead of vandalising one of the actual good things.
Yeah, turns out from getting into business with the 2nd richest man in the world, not her music.She is.
Well, obvious being billionaires shouldn't exist, full stop. But if someone is so good at something, something that isn't DIRECTLY unethical, unless you are so tightly wound you consider accepting contracts getting paid that much unethical, then why shouldn't he?
Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
Because money isn't in unlimited supply. By definition if one person has a dragons hoard of it, that means less for everyone else.
Amount of people who don't wash there hands full stop is disgusting.What's with those campaigners that take a massive sh*t in public bathrooms then just splash their hands for 0.5 seconds on the way out. Your hands aren't clean you disgusting campaigner, they're covered in poo. Humans are ******* gross
What's with those campaigners that take a massive sh*t in public bathrooms then just splash their hands for 0.5 seconds on the way out. Your hands aren't clean you disgusting campaigner, they're covered in poo. Humans are ******* gross
poop peeperAre you the toilet monitor?
Are you the toilet monitor?
What's with those campaigners that take a massive sh*t in public bathrooms then just splash their hands for 0.5 seconds on the way out. Your hands aren't clean you disgusting campaigner, they're covered in poo. Humans are ******* gross
You might need to reconsider your shitting technique.Your hands aren't clean you disgusting campaigner, they're covered in poo.
Are you the guy who doesn't wash his hands?
But if he wasn't a billionaire it likely wouldn't be going to those areas that need it most. The dollars would be going to those just below him on the food chain, other millionaires.Because money isn't in unlimited supply. By definition if one person has a dragons hoard of it, that means less for everyone else.
Unfortunately a mate of mine is like this.Amount of people who don't wash there hands full stop is disgusting.
Agree, that's why I'd take the money that benefited the club as it's all tainted. He says typing on an iPad made here (and this is the most positive slant possible):Not wanting to argue about whether to cross a bridge we’re never going to come to anyway… but people are always going to choose where they draw the line, and it’s almost always going to be arbitrary and/or hypocritical if given that much scrutiny, because that’s the nature of line-drawing.