US Election 2020: President Elect Biden and VP Elect Harris

The Next President and VP will be?


  • Total voters
    315
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is continued in... The Aftermath

 
Last edited:
Did anyone else find the terminology used by Sidney Powell interesting when interviewed about that dominion voting machine? Her "firstly, I never say anything without having proof first" is very curious behavior from someone with a reputation like hers (and stands to have it trashed). If what she is saying is true and systematic fraud is proven as a result I can barely conceive the ramifications.
Lindsay Graham wants legal votes cast in Georgia thrown out so that the Republicans can win the state.
STOP THE STEAL!!!!!!!
 
Did anyone else find the terminology used by Sidney Powell interesting when interviewed about that dominion voting machine? Her "firstly, I never say anything without having proof first" is very curious behavior from someone with a reputation like hers (and stands to have it trashed). If what she is saying is true and systematic fraud is proven as a result I can barely conceive the ramifications.
Wow I'm convinced. Sidney Powell never lies
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Trumpists live in an alternate reality where the following demonstrably and obviously false statements are true to them:
- The Russians didn't rig the 2016 election
So you believe the Russians rigged the 2016 election, despite that Trump received even more votes in 2020.

This is the problem with leftists. Critical thinking isnt applied and you just go along with what CNN tells you. Ignorance must indeed be bliss...
 
When she made those comments she deliberately put up her own reputation. That was my point. Its a curious thing for someone to lie and undermine a lifetime building such a reputation as hers.
Not one republican cares about their reputation so it's not curious at all
 
When she made those comments she deliberately put up her own reputation. That was my point. Its a curious thing for someone to lie and undermine a lifetime building such a reputation as hers.
Do you think Giuliani is protecting his reputation?
 
When she made those comments she deliberately put up her own reputation. That was my point. Its a curious thing for someone to lie and undermine a lifetime building such a reputation as hers.
She is being well paid by her client and don't think she would lose anything out of this engagement as she will be angling for a rule of law type decision as an interpretation of the facts in favour of her client. You are suggesting overly simplistic arguments based on no proof - she is much smarter than that.
 
Aside from Bolton and Romney the republicans are certainly quite aligned in their assertion that there was voting fraud.
They are scared of a Trump wave in 2022

Lickspittles the lot of them
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Last edited:
So you believe the Russians rigged the 2016 election, despite that Trump received even more votes in 2020.

This is the problem with leftists. Critical thinking isnt applied and you just go along with what CNN tells you. Ignorance must indeed be bliss...
You must be proud to hear that the Sec of State of Georgia and his family, a Republican, is receiving death threats from those of his own party because he won't act to ensure that Trump wins fraudulently.
 
She is being well paid by her client and don't think she would lose anything out of this engagement as she will be angling for a rule of law type decision as an interpretation of the facts in favour of her client. You are suggesting overly simplistic arguments based on no proof - she is much smarter than that.
I think she might simply be trying to scare state legislators into delaying the certification of their states vote. But I still find it a curious strategy to deliberately make an issue of her her own reputation when referring to a "fire-hose of evidence" to come.
 
Did anyone else find the terminology used by Sidney Powell interesting when interviewed about that dominion voting machine? Her "firstly, I never say anything without having proof first" is very curious behavior from someone with a reputation like hers (and stands to have it trashed). If what she is saying is true and systematic fraud is proven as a result I can barely conceive the ramifications.

Issue for them is this rhetoric has been going on since the election - we have evidence, very compelling, its all coming... and it never does.
 
So you believe the Russians rigged the 2016 election, despite that Trump received even more votes in 2020.

Yes. The evidence is ****ing overwhelming the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.

The Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election with the goals of harming the campaign of Hillary Clinton, boosting the candidacy of Donald Trump, and increasing political and social discord in the United States. According to U.S. intelligence agencies, the operation was ordered directly by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russi...United_States_elections#Non-U.S._intelligence

Are you actually sitting there arguing the FBI, CIA, (Republican led) Senate Intelligence committee, the DSD and Intelligence agencies of the UK, Germany, Estonia, Poland, Australia, the Netherlands and France (who all discovered and relayed this interference with the elction) etc are all just 'making this shit up'?

Its all just the Jews, the Deep State, and the Fake news?

This is the problem with you Trumpists; you live in a completely different reality. You're prepared to ignore overwhelming evidence in favour of conspiracy theories like Pizza gate, or baseless claims from your Pumpkin overlord that self evidently fly in the face of observed reality and overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

It's pointless engaging with you for this very reason, and it's why threads with you people in them turn into stinking heaps of dog turd. You cant argue with someone who clings to fantasy as if it's real.
 
Did anyone else find the terminology used by Sidney Powell interesting when interviewed about that dominion voting machine? Her "firstly, I never say anything without having proof first" is very curious behavior from someone with a reputation like hers (and stands to have it trashed). If what she is saying is true and systematic fraud is proven as a result I can barely conceive the ramifications.
Hey sport.
Do us a favour and conceive the ramifications and then post.
 
When she made those comments she deliberately put up her own reputation. That was my point. Its a curious thing for someone to lie and undermine a lifetime building such a reputation as hers.

Its curious the way in which quite a few people are behaving that I honestly would have expected better from (not a heap mind you, but a few).
 
Issue for them is this rhetoric has been going on since the election - we have evidence, very compelling, its all coming... and it never does.
It takes time to put together affidavits. They are up to 500 odd of these now and the validity of these have not been tested in court (or at least only a fraction have).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top