The article states:
“The findings of this assessment, along with their past medical history, including injuries, illnesses, medications, surgeries, scans and more, are added to the league's medical platform, which can be accessed by relevant staff from all 18 clubs.”
Are you suggesting that’s not correct?
I'm suggesting that not all relevant information is provided. Things like a player having multiple scans but only 1 is available, non disclosed concussions. Major illnesses, medications and briefs on their medical history is provided as well as some scans.
Now i'm not sure if there is a consent issue here and the AFL are actually providing all the information they are allowed but things 100% get missed. Like incidents in junior preseasons.
FFS an underage player had sexual relations with an animal and whilst almost all clubs knew about it eventually, the drafting club didn't.