Strategy What to do with pick 1 now we’ve got it - Do We Need Reid or is it Curtins

Keep pick 1, or trade it?


  • Total voters
    397
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had enough of all of these kents already.

Nothing would satisfy me more right now than drafting H.Reid and watch him kick a bag against the tin-rattlers.


And anyone else wanting to entertain splitting the pick in this massively compromised draft needs to give themselves an uppercut as well.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That’s the sort of trade needed to part with pick 1 imo

Reid & Hardemann/Tholstrup/Insert name here

vs

Curtin & McKercher/Duursma

It’s an interesting comparison and I think there’d be posters who still keep Reid and whoever we get at 19
Reid and 19


On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
dragons den win GIF by CBC
 
How dumb are they. Only show up when we are winning. Do they watch any football. And to talk up the SA sides who are way more non footy state then us. If Port were down the bottom be lucky they get 5000 show up to a match. They almost folded last time they were down the bottom. North aswell. Eagles get 60000 this year each game. I'm offended. Hope that shithead does a knee.

We had packed crowds in a wooden spoon year that was almost history breaking bad for our standards and still packed it out.

Can't stand entitled private school boy footy players. This Watson kid looks like the type that had everything handed to him. Doesn't deserve to be in the AFL with that response.
As if he doesn’t call himself Wizard! Some of the best AFL matches I have been to have been in WA. Incredible supporters, love their footy and I am a Victorian but gotta respect the WA footy passion!
 
Can see this unfortunately. They may need points to match a Sanders bid assuming the AFL grant access to him as part of an assistance package.
19 for Brockman and Hawthorn F2

Hawthorn F2 for Robertson
Leaves us with Curtin (2), Port's first, Port's second, our 3rd, Port's 3rd, Brockman, Robertson
Because we're too much of a good guy to use the PSD as a threat, we should be offering Brisbane a third rounder for Robertson but we'd never do it.

giphy (3).gif


Someone give this kent a Stone Cold Stunner.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)


2:00-4:20 John Ralph pretty adamant McKay going to Swans on 800k for 5 years. Band 1, gives North picks 2 and 3. I can’t see North overlooking Curtin with both oof these picks. Pretty much leaves us with one potential trading partner for pick 1, and I can’t see ROB and the boys entertaining anything other than pick 2 and 3 for 1 and 19 which I still hope they don’t agree to.

Disclaimer: John Ralph is a p***k and I don’t believe a word he says.
 

2:00-4:20 John Ralph pretty adamant McKay going to Swans on 800k for 5 years. Band 1, gives North picks 2 and 3. I can’t see North overlooking Curtin with both oof these picks. Pretty much leaves us with one potential trading partner for pick 1, and I can’t see ROB and the boys entertaining anything other than pick 2 and 3 for 1 and 19 which I still hope they don’t agree to.

Disclaimer: John Ralph is a p***k and I don’t believe a word he says.
If North get pick 3 I’d say any deal for pick 1 is off. We’d only want Curtin in return so that rules Melbourne out unless they can find a way to sort a 3 team trade to get us pick 2 (which I can’t see where they’d find the currency to satisfy both us and North).

So that leaves North, and they will have zero incentive to trade up unless we accept a shit deal like 2 and 16 (in which case we might as well fold). McKercher and Curtin suit their needs better and they’ll get both.
 

2:00-4:20 John Ralph pretty adamant McKay going to Swans on 800k for 5 years. Band 1, gives North picks 2 and 3. I can’t see North overlooking Curtin with both oof these picks. Pretty much leaves us with one potential trading partner for pick 1, and I can’t see ROB and the boys entertaining anything other than pick 2 and 3 for 1 and 19 which I still hope they don’t agree to.

Disclaimer: John Ralph is a p***k and I don’t believe a word he says.

It’s great news for us if true, I think it rules out us doing anything stupid like trading with Melbourne and it probably only means we’d entertain a 1 and 19 for 2 and 3 type offer, I’d still prefer Reid but wouldn’t care if we took that.
 
If North get pick 3 I’d say any deal for pick 1 is off. We’d only want Curtin in return so that rules Melbourne out unless they can find a way to sort a 3 team trade to get us pick 2 (which I can’t see where they’d find the currency to satisfy both us and North).

So that leaves North, and they will have zero incentive to trade up unless we accept a s**t deal like 2 and 16 (in which case we might as well fold). McKercher and Curtin suit their needs better and they’ll get both.
We can only hope that everything you have written is correct. If North take Curtain and McKercher as expected we also shouldn’t go after GCS pick 4 (6). I’d be delighted if we just keep our draft hand as is.
 
Yep and Enjoy the Victorian Media asking what your team should do. lol

Because the victorian media is always right. lol

The Victorian media supports and loves the Fremantle dockers. lol
Nobody loves the Fremantle Dockers

Not even their own supporters who only follow them because of that weird persecution complex you all have

Were only formed to be a drag on the eagles which is why your emblem is an anchor.
 
We can only hope that everything you have written is correct. If North take Curtain and McKercher as expected we also shouldn’t go after GCS pick 4 (6). I’d be delighted if we just keep our draft hand as is.

I’m convinced North are going to go Watson at 3 or maybe trade down a couple spots to get him and an extra pick.

Have heard they are into McKercher and Watson heavily though, so it’ll be interesting to see what they do, you can surely lock in Curtin at 2 or 3 though.
 
It’s great news for us if true, I think it rules out us doing anything stupid like trading with Melbourne and it probably only means we’d entertain a 1 and 19 for 2 and 3 type offer, I’d still prefer Reid but wouldn’t care if we took that.
Agreed. Strange feeling being glad another team might be gifted pick 3 on the back of a wooden spoon season. Dagger to the hearts of the small group of Melbourne supporters who think they are smarter than the rest of the room. Absolutely would not trade 1 and 19 for 2 and 3 though, and I don’t think North would either.
 
I’m convinced North are going to go Watson at 3 or maybe trade down a couple spots to get him and an extra pick.

Have heard they are into McKercher and Watson heavily though, so it’ll be interesting to see what they do, you can surely lock in Curtin at 2 or 3 though.
If that’s the case then the pursuit of GCS pick is back on if it gets us McKercher, happily put F1 on the table. Watson and Curtin definitely more of a need for North with their plethora of young mids already on the list, not to mention possible access to Sanders which they will need Port’s 1R pick for. If we leave this draft with Reid, McKercher and one of DeMattia or Hardeman I’ll be harder than a javelin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top