Dem feelsGee that 2009 draft has hurt us.
Imagine Menzel, Duncan, Christensen, Vardy, Cowan.
No fault of the club though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Dem feelsGee that 2009 draft has hurt us.
Imagine Menzel, Duncan, Christensen, Vardy, Cowan.
Punch his hand through a wall in the coaching box?What do you think Clarkson would do in this position?
I agree. Ridiculous histronics don't make a coach good.Punch his hand through a wall in the coaching box?
Abuse some old man running the water?
Abuse an opposition player?
Hmm- or has already been said?
I agree. Ridiculous histronics don't make a coach good.
AC is currently the best. But it helps to have a great team at your disposal.I have no hesitation in saying he'd do better than Scott right now.
But that's not really saying anything dramatic at all.
He's the best in the comp by a fair stretch at present.
In his last two competitive games as a coach, Clarko has made the two AFL premiership coaches before him look utterly clueless.
Chris Scott sits alongside all the other coaches at present (Kenny aside, perhaps) in copping one heck of a football lesson from AC at this stage.
Depends on how you see the retirements panning out?
2015: Kelly, Enright, SJ (Caddy, Guthrie, Motlop)
2016: Lonergan, McIntosh, Bartel (God only knows, Stanley/Vardy, Hyphen)
2017: Rivers, Mackie, Stokes (Who knows?, Bews/Thurlow, Murdoch/McCarthy)
It doesn't help that the three really bright young talents who should be hitting their straps right now are Christensen, Menzel and Vardy. That would have been ideal, but those circumstances are really beyond our control.
Measured and reasonable post!!
Next week will be when we can start sharpening knives. Round 1 is historically f*cked because every team has been in a bubble for 6 months.
Punch his hand through a wall in the coaching box?
Abuse some old man running the water?
Abuse an opposition player?
Hmm- or has already been said?
If you had Bews or Smedts or any other young player playing instead of Bartel or Kelly- I'd say the 3 goals or single goal would've blown out to 5 and 3. Yes, they were pretty much cooked by the end of the season but I consider that an error on the part of the MC or perhaps the failure of other players to meet expectations and thus more workload on the shoulders of the older players.
Rewarding VFL form is one thing but giving a younger player the red carpet treatment over an older player who has played one poor game in a losing team that was soundly trounced, just because he is younger, is something else entirely. Would Gore have been any better than Bartel or Kelly yesterday? I would say 'probably not'.
Those two players were in the top third of players in votes per game in our B&F last year. Bartel was ranked 2nd at the halfway mark and 3/4 mark of the season. Enright, whose head has also been called for after yesterday and who is also the wrong side of 30, was among our best 5 players in his last 8 games played (as voted by our coaches) and ranked 6th in votes per game overall.
In our first NAB game vs the Gold Coast, Bartel and Kelly were in the top 5 Cats players as ranked by AFL.com.au. Bartel topped the Fantasy points in both NAB 1 and 2 and got 22 possessions in half a game in NAB 3.
Erk- you're right.Sorry.
Incorrect.
Hawks were 9th in 09, but it was not a bottom out or a rebuild, it was a Flag hangover.
Dammit! There's always one that I miss!You left out random kids at Auskick.
Not for us, we won in Round 1 in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013 and 2014.
I am using ones in the current lineup, who we have put games into over the last three years - because that is what succession planning is. You don't replace club leaders with rookies, you replace them with players who are establishing themselves as top-line AFL players with several seasons under their belts. Of all the players I mentioned, Guthrie has played the most games with 65.There's no way McIntosh should go beyond this year. You're also using players in the current lineup. Who will replace those few you've listed? So we are replacing 200-300 gamers with, 100 or less, then replacing those guys with players with less than 10-15 games?
I'm also unsure stokes will last that long either, rivers is also a long bow to draw continuing another year.
More holes than a Swiss cheese factory.
Then throw in Menzel, Cowan. By then Harry is 31-32.
So turning over a third of the list in about 3 years, without ready considering those who just aren't up to AFL standard.
Have to admit it, but as I missed the 63 GF by virtue of a year, (I was 7) Hawthorn, in my history as a Geelong supporter, SEEMS to have our measure in the BIG scheme of things. (Dare I say - when it counts??)Erk- you're right.
They missed the finals.
And that was the flag WE gifted them before their time- or so it is written
Gee that 2009 draft has hurt us.
Imagine Menzel, Duncan, Christensen, Vardy, Cowan, Laidler, all in our side and with the physical freedom and experience that their draft peers like Fyfe/Martin/Talia/Jetta/Carlisle/Gunston now have.
I spent most of the past 2 seasons explaining my feelings that Geelong is way too hampered by IFFY players.That has affected us immensely. If Menzel and Vardy had remained fit, Christensen had stayed and Cowan was able to show some of potential we would be in a far better position than we currently are.
I spent most of the past 2 seasons explaining my feelings that Geelong is way too hampered by IFFY players.
If only..
If only...
If only.......
DON'T YOU DAREMurdoch, Smedts, Horlin-Smith, Simpson, Walker, Thurlow, Kersten, Bews, Hartman, McCarthy, Lang, Cockatoo, Gregson .....
I am using ones in the current lineup, who we have put games into over the last three years - because that is what succession planning is. You don't replace club leaders with rookies, you replace them with players who are establishing themselves as top-line AFL players with several seasons under their belts. Of all the players I mentioned, Guthrie has played the most games with 65.
These players are then replaced with rookies like Gregson, Cockatoo, Jansen, Gore &etc.
Three years.I am so glad we've had this discussion.....
So we replace 8 players in two years, all veterans, with players already in the team. Then replace those with 8 untried players with no experience.
Wasn't that my point.
I apologise for slipping in a few 'over the top' analogies, Partridge, and replying to some other posters comments while I was replying to what I quoted of yours.Maybe, maybe not. We simply don't know and can't know that.
Not like you TC, I never said anything about the red carpet treatment, I said form should be rewarded. Horlin-Smith got dropped - correctly - and played a very good game doing exactly the kind of role we need. Winning contested possessions and clearances. He's young too. I'd bring him for Kelly in a heartbeat. Gore is yet to debut, so obviously he's an unknown quantity. Blease could be a useful replacement for Stokes though. Sure it's riskier, but he's much younger and much quicker. Has some senior experience too.
How many have called for Enright's head? I certainly said that if he offers multiple repeat performances like yesterday he should be dropped, and I stand by that. He was terrible yesterday and criticism is entirely warranted.
As for the last sentence, sure pre-season form is encouraging, but it's just that. No matter how highly they were ranked in the NAB Cup, they found yesterday the real thing against Hawthorn is slightly tougher. Both were obliterated (they had plenty of mates of course).
No matter how much we'd like to ignore it, for Bartel, Kelly, Stokes, and Enright (at least), they're on the downhill slide now. It's just a fact. They aren't going to roll the clock back and play like they're 25. We can either acknowledge, and start thinking about contingencies fast, or completely ignore it and stay deluded. I know what I'd prefer the club do. We'll find out as the season goes on which is correct.
Peter Riccardi retired just one year short of a flag. (Yes, I know he was cooked).The 2009 draft could have been the miracle that delivered us the fourth flag - probably in 2013. But maybe the football gods thought we had our fair share. The Menzel-Christensen-Vardy situation is probably my only source of Geelong related sadness over last decade. 2008 doesn't even hurt like seeing unfulfilled young talent.
And Bomber T just sat in the box eating sandwiches!
Lost in 2007. Based on that precedent I'm calling it Geelong will win the premiership this year.