Did he?Held together by bandages but he just had one of the best seasons of all time by an individual
Really?
Yet he couldn't win the Players MVP or Coaches Award, and played a single final and failed to receive a coaches vote?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did he?Held together by bandages but he just had one of the best seasons of all time by an individual
One of those was rigged by an bias coach so doesn't really countDid he?
Really?
Yet he couldn't win the Players MVP or Coaches Award?
Take your anti Carlton behaviour where the sun don't shine, amigo.Did he?
Really?
Yet he couldn't win the Players MVP or Coaches Award, and played a single final and failed to receive a coaches vote?
Refer to collingwoods brownlow team tally for 2024, and then tell me again, how no team relies on an individual more than Carlton does.They really are a one man band and no other team relies on one player to the extent that the blues rely on their captain. As it is he’s being held together by bandages.
Because we didn't lose for 9 weeks with 15 injuries and didn't carry on like the world was ending. Brissy has ACLs everywhere and won the flag. Stop with the victim mentality of injuries when you're going shithouse. Its sad. Injuries are guna hurt more when you're depth is terribleRefer to collingwoods brownlow team tally for 2024, and then tell me again, how no team relies on an individual more than Carlton does.
Do the same on Collingwood threads then. **** me the hypocrisy of you fogs is breathtakingTake your anti Carlton behaviour where the sun don't shine, amigo.
Just reference what I consider an incorrect opinion. Don't get all gungho over it. Fact is , Nick goes down , Collingwood are stuffed and most people know it. Cripps goes down and everyone thinks we become Richmond like. It's hilarious how people are talking up injuries to star players - sad actually.Because we didn't lose for 9 weeks with 15 injuries and didn't carry on like the world was ending. Brissy has ACLs everywhere and won the flag. Stop with the victim mentality of injuries when you're going shithouse. Its sad. Injuries are gun e hurt more when you're depth is terrible
This will end well.
It's a Carlton thread. We know the main 3 amigos and their anti Carlton agenda just love flooding these threads with the same BS . It's all in the banter thread perhaps keep your opinions over there and keep this one a little bit serious for a changeDo the same on Collingwood threads then. **** me the hypocrisy of you fogs is breathtaking
But Carlton did.Just reference what I consider an incorrect opinion. Don't get all gungho over it. Fact is , Nick goes down , Collingwood are stuffed and most people know it. Cripps goes down and everyone thinks we become Richmond like. It's hilarious how people are talking up injuries to star players - sad actually.
Why don't you answer the question as opposed to playing the poster.It's a Carlton thread. We know the main 3 amigos and their anti Carlton agenda just love flooding these threads with the same BS . It's all in the banter thread perhaps keep your opinions over there and keep this one a little bit serious for a change
They wouldn't have needed to, in the same way as Carlton finished above Collingwood, despite losing two games to them, courtesy of the North/Richmond double ups.Essendon couldn't beat Carlton though mate, now you're just talking rubbish.
It is the Main Board, right?Take your anti Carlton behaviour where the sun don't shine, amigo.
I like the way they honestly think the only reason they're not consistently contending for flags is because of their unprecedented injury misfortunes each year.Because we didn't lose for 9 weeks with 15 injuries and didn't carry on like the world was ending. Brissy has ACLs everywhere and won the flag. Stop with the victim mentality of injuries when you're going shithouse. Its sad. Injuries are guna hurt more when you're depth is terrible
This will end well.
You've expressed the same opinion on every single thread relating to my club. Everyone knows your opinion. Do you get off or something expressing the same stuff over and over and over again ? Glad you get your little giggles and your amigo mates still sitting in Mexico doing a circle jerk over Carlton in an elimination final . It's quite boring.It is the Main Board, right?
If you don't want to hear from neutrals commenting about Carlton, in a thread specific to Carlton on the Main Board, I suggest you stick to the Carlton Board.You've expressed the same opinion on every single thread relating to my club. Everyone knows your opinion. Do you get off or something expressing the same stuff over and over and over again ? Glad you get your little giggles and your amigo mates still sitting in Mexico doing a circle jerk over Carlton in an elimination final . It's quite boring.
You're not neutralIf you don't want to hear from neutrals commenting about Carlton, in a thread specific to Carlton on the Main Board, I suggest you stick to the Carlton Board.
Don't you love it?They wouldn't have needed to, in the same way as Carlton finished above Collingwood, despite losing two games to them, courtesy of the North/Richmond double ups.
You are so far from a neutral poster it's laughable.If you don't want to hear from neutrals commenting about Carlton, in a thread specific to Carlton on the Main Board, I suggest you stick to the Carlton Board.
not only do you have the world's most accurate abacus but now you seem to have acquired teh ability to speak for the 'many' - aren't they lucky!But Carlton did.
How did Carlton go without Tom De Koning for the last few games of the season?
A player who many would rate as Carlton's 6th best player.
Collingwood are a very well coached side that does not rely on individuals to carry the team. Collingwood won three of their last four games played without Nick Daicos, including a final.Refer to collingwoods brownlow team tally for 2024, and then tell me again, how no team relies on an individual more than Carlton does.
What are you on about? I think it’s time for you to sit it out my friend.You’re literally making my argument for me.
I’ve not made any claim regarding the quality of the player we’ll pick at 3.
Because as you said, he could be great, he could be crap. Only time will tell.
Meanwhile, Beer Bandit over here is certain pick 3 won’t have an immediate impact.
And can’t elaborate on as to why.
Well…we know why. It’s because Carlton.
So let me get this straight.
You’re certain pick 3 won’t do much in year 1, and your entire reasoning is because some draft picks are good and some are bad.
Meanwhile you still seem to think I’m claiming whoever we pick at 3 will make an immediate impact. Despite, of course, me not saying anything to that effect.
Yeah, maybe it’s time to sit this one out. You seem a bit all over the shop.
P.S - Still waiting on the evidence that a pick 3 immediately makes that side better the following year.
You are just arguing for the sake of arguing buddy.You'll be waiting a long while, because I never said it would. And I've clarified that a number of times yet somehow, hilariously, it still doesn't seem to have sunk in.
Meanwhile, your stance seems to be that there's no chance it will. And your evidence is...because Carlton. And because some draft picks don't work out.
Nice.
Opinions are great but when you talk in absolutes with no real basis for doing so, don't get upset when you're called out for it.
More then 65% agree with me.
Go cry in the corner and don’t spoil the thread by getting your back up at peoples opinions.