List Mgmt. Contract, Trade & Draftee Discussion - 2022 Off Season Edition

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Contract status of all players now fully updated

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

* him up 88
No way he scared 😳 me too much with his face slap. His a scary man
Scared Dog GIF
 
My Intel was correct it looks like. As suggested by me eagles split picks and got 2 west Aussies. When I suggested this would happen months ago before the media reported it, many on here called BS said I was a liar. I also said eagles would never select phillipou based on my Intel. Also correct. I predicted west Aussies with pick slide so I was spot on. To my critics how do those lemons taste . It's nice to be validated when people have called you out and you prove them dead wrong. The so called experts on the forum are not as smart as they think they are. I have a reliable source of Intel within the eagles club whether the big egos here like it or not. Eat humble pie
Sounds like we may all be eating this humble pasta for a while now

On SM-N985F using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Looking at that list profile, take out Allen and the 21 to 25 year age group is a shite show.

Confirms that we really need 2 more years of low draft picks.

Simply cannot afford to finish better than 14th next year or we need to trade out some stars.

Otherwise we will be the Saints.
Absolutely.

But a re-balance has started. Two years ago it was oldies, only Allen as a young, Barass as a middle age, and a bare cupboard of youth.
We're not there yet, but today it looks better (and actually has some hope attached) than it did.
 
Anyone whose read Phil’s posts would understand he has a really good depth of knowledge of draftees.

Did the right thing and didn’t post who his team was into, draft strategy and nothing during the draft. Now is under attack from a guy that brags he exclusively laid out WCE plans months before…

What’s more it’s somebody that could enlighten us plebs on some of the intricacies of what happens in a draft room after the fact
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Looking at that list profile, take out Allen and the 21 to 25 year age group is a shite show.

Confirms that we really need 2 more years of low draft picks.

Simply cannot afford to finish better than 14th next year or we need to trade out some stars.

Otherwise we will be the Saints.
Well said. Some call it tanking but we can't afford to finish too high next year the 2023 super draft is critical to our future, we need a low finish and a top 5 pick for 2023. Maybe get picks 3, 21, 28 (ports second rounder imo), 39. That's not bad we finish third last and grab 4 picks in top 40 for 2023 which is probably similar to 4 picks in top 30 for 2022 this year. A good batch of 8 decent picks close together in back to back draft. That's a realistic get for us. No dreamer trades here that will never happen
 
I could reveal more Intel but I don't see the benefit in doing so. Ask yourself this what is the benefit of posters revealing Intel to other posters? Why do it ?
Something called credibility. Taking Ginbey and Hewett (if available) at our first selections has been the short priced favourite for months. If you have multiple, non-vague pieces of inside info then more people might take you seriously rather than creating a meme of yourself
 
Anyone whose read Phil’s posts would understand he has a really good depth of knowledge of draftees.

Did the right thing and didn’t post who his team was into, draft strategy and nothing during the draft. Now is under attack from a guy that brags he exclusively laid out WCE plans months before…

What’s more it’s somebody that could enlighten us plebs some of the intricacies of what happens in a draft room after the fact
Having knowledge of the draft does not prove one works for an afl club. It's funny, what Phil is doing is not too different to me, my attack on him was strategic, it was to test people like you for a double standard, fair to say you failed that test. You see people believe what they want to believe, add in emotion and out the door goes logic. You express your support of Phil in a way that suggests a bias, an emotion. It is not based on impartiality and logic.
 
I feel like it's China with the mods on here. You can't say anything critical about them or you get censored, I'll probably get banned just for writing this. I've never seen a forum so heavily protective of its elite.
Are you deliberately poking the Biggie Bear so that you can be banned and then say 'I told you so!'?
 
Having knowledge of the draft does not prove one works for an afl club. It's funny, what Phil is doing is not too different to me, my attack on him was strategic, it was to test people like you for a double standard, fair to say you failed that test. You see people believe what they want to believe, add in emotion and out the door goes logic. You express your support of Phil in a way that suggests a bias, an emotion. It is not based on impartiality and logic.
Pretty sure Phil doesn't have a history of posting stuff that he claimed was 'insider knowledge' but had actually been reported in the news days prior.

He also doesn't spend his days attempting to destroy the credibility of others because of jealousy.
 
Something called credibility. Taking Ginbey and Hewett (if available) at our first selections has been the short priced favourite for months. If you have multiple, non-vague pieces of inside info then more people might take you seriously rather than creating a meme of yourself
I did my predictions before all this, before them being favourites, before the pick swap before they were even in our draft range. Sorry but you are late to the party. Many called BS on me saying it wouldn't happen now many say it was likely to have happened anyway, well they didn't say that then and you can't have it both ways. Funny how before what I said wouldn't happen and now that it has people say it was likely to have happened anyway. You have changed your tune now but I didn't. I've been consistent all the way whether you like it or not. Enjoy the 🍋
 
my attack on him was strategic, it was to test people like you for a double standard, fair to say you failed that test. You see people believe what they want to believe, add in emotion and out the door goes logic. You express your support of Phil in a way that suggests a bias, an emotion. It is not based on impartiality and logic.
Hook it into my veins
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top