-
AFLW 2024 - Round 7 - Pride Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mega Thread 2011/12 Trade/Draft/Delist MegaThread, now twice as mega!
- Thread starter Miguel Sanchez
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
ITs supposedly a third round pick ie 61 ,... so really a freebie
Ochre
:o
pantskyle
Angry Ape
- Oct 1, 2007
- 128,490
- 133,785
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Storm-Man Utd-Heart-Luton-Patriots
Seems like a punt really, if it pays off then goodie for us if not then delisted ala JON.
- Sep 12, 2008
- 12,701
- 70
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Memphis Grizzlies, Bengals
It's been pretty good so far http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/AF...Trades-Delistings-Retirements/255625354469983
A 2nd or 3rd rounder should get the deal done.
- Mar 20, 2007
- 29,530
- 27,331
- AFL Club
- West Coast
THe J Hill trade rumour was in the Weekend West ,.... third round pick for J Hill
kane249
Wibble
- Oct 27, 2006
- 52,726
- 70,788
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Sth Freo, Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
gurncentral
Team Captain
- Sep 11, 2011
- 322
- 8
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Is he contracted? Seems like a prime candidate for a rookie spot.
The AFL has rejected the GWS mini-draft sell off and return of Picks ,.... GWS has spat the dummy and now wont trade off any picks this year instead trading the four picks next year . GWS think they will get Omeara next year anyway ,
This mini draft hasn't worked well
The Eagles might trade the PP from Port ( If we accept ) and 23 to BL for Clark ,....just speculation I think from Seven Sport .
This mini draft hasn't worked well
The Eagles might trade the PP from Port ( If we accept ) and 23 to BL for Clark ,....just speculation I think from Seven Sport .
GWS' fault there.
Incidentally is there a source? Ie is this official?
Incidentally is there a source? Ie is this official?
Serves them right, Greedy Sheedy at it again.
The AFL has rejected the GWS mini-draft sell off and return of Picks ,.... GWS has spat the dummy and now wont trade off any picks this year instead trading the four picks next year . GWS think they will get Omeara next year anyway ,
This mini draft hasn't worked well
The Eagles might trade the PP from Port ( If we accept ) and 23 to BL for Clark ,....just speculation I think from Seven Sport .
Sounds like some posters on BigFooty do actually get involved at trade week then.
Good.
Scully, Coniglio, O'Meara and pick 1 next year. That's a midfield made up of the next Hodge, Goddard, Murphy, etc. Not to mention Ward, Palmer, Davis, all the other top picks and concessions they get.
Nobody will bother watching if they dominate every year.
Will the AFL ever get it right?
Scully, Coniglio, O'Meara and pick 1 next year. That's a midfield made up of the next Hodge, Goddard, Murphy, etc. Not to mention Ward, Palmer, Davis, all the other top picks and concessions they get.
Nobody will bother watching if they dominate every year.
Will the AFL ever get it right?
- Banned
- #868
Now at least they will have to choose between Whitfield and O'Meara, or some as yet un-heralded young gun.
Shiel, Coniglio, Scully, Ward and O'Meara is already scary enough, so hopefully we can do the rest of the comp a solid and steal one of Coniglio or O'Meara (if they draft him) back off GWS in the next few seasons.
So WS won't trade any of the picks? I would be genuinely surprised if they didn't.
Even if Omera is the next Judd those picks are way more valuable then even the next Judd.
Even if Omera is the next Judd those picks are way more valuable then even the next Judd.
- May 26, 2006
- 4,486
- 561
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- WCW, Patriots, Knicks
Can all the clubs agree for some teams (4+) to throw their games against GWS next year so they don't get pick 1? It would be appreciated.
I think it's a great effort on the part of GWS to try what they have, but I would like to see some of their plans screw up. AFL needs to learn there's a difference between competitive/successful and outright domination.
C'mon Port, take one for the league and tank next year! Or Melbourne.
I think it's a great effort on the part of GWS to try what they have, but I would like to see some of their plans screw up. AFL needs to learn there's a difference between competitive/successful and outright domination.
C'mon Port, take one for the league and tank next year! Or Melbourne.
The original rules where the new teams weren't able to get picks in their first year would of solved this problem.
GC were handed generous handouts and used them in the spirit of the game.
GWS has just poached young talent after new young talent and have been given far too much by the AFL (why should they be given more than GC?)
They can poach players for 2 years and have the 4 picks which are worth possibly more than 4 top ten picks. They also get an uncompromised draft in their first year.
I hate GWS Already
GC were handed generous handouts and used them in the spirit of the game.
GWS has just poached young talent after new young talent and have been given far too much by the AFL (why should they be given more than GC?)
They can poach players for 2 years and have the 4 picks which are worth possibly more than 4 top ten picks. They also get an uncompromised draft in their first year.
I hate GWS Already
Ian Dargie
Premiership Player
- Jun 14, 2011
- 4,838
- 1,512
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Banned
- #874
Apparently Port are trying to use pick 33 to get another player from a third club, who would join West Coast in return for Ebert heading to Port:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...s-for-brad-ebert/story-fn69a32t-1226164307001
Sounds plausible, although I wonder who it would be.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...s-for-brad-ebert/story-fn69a32t-1226164307001
Sounds plausible, although I wonder who it would be.
Coast Guard
Senior List
this board will explode if we accept 33 with anything less than a proven quality player.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
