Please don't be Josh. Please don't be Josh.He's pretty dangerous when left without a tag.
However, getting Stephen has meant we were able to get Brad. Also isn't there another Hill brother who is due to come through the system?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Please don't be Josh. Please don't be Josh.He's pretty dangerous when left without a tag.
However, getting Stephen has meant we were able to get Brad. Also isn't there another Hill brother who is due to come through the system?
He's pretty dangerous when left without a tag.
However, getting Stephen has meant we were able to get Brad. Also isn't there another Hill brother who is due to come through the system?
Ditto,remember being amazed at his sheer guts and effort.By contrast Hill in the last quarter of the preliminary final for WP was throwing himself everywhere desperately defending. Skinny little kid was going in everywhere trying to get his team over the line.
Just had a squiz at the 2009 live draft thread when Fyfe's name was read out at pick 20 and I found this post in particular pretty funny
phewIan Hill
I feel a bit the same way about Logue now. Not quite the same situation but I do admire his work ethic that he's displayed in his rowing, getting up at crack of dawn every day to do miles on the river in winter is pretty impressive. And the way he talked about mental side of sport, being able to push through the pain barrier because you want to be better and or win.Ditto,remember being amazed at his sheer guts and effort.
Then you find out he's getting up at 5 to work at the brickfactory before school and you know we've got it right.
Great player,great person,great story.
Then we get the bro.
Welcome to freo at pick 7http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-11-04/draft-prospect-not-going-to-give-up-despite-heart-condition
Kid is crazy if he tries to play on.
Yeah he caught my eye in the U18's and seemed very mature,humble and thoughtful in his interviews.Thats the kind of kid we want to draft. And he looks a super talent.
Depends how you define as secondary dimensions, they don't quite have the Fyfe ability to go to a different part of the ground and impact there.Don't think Lachie or Connor lack 'secondary dimensions'.
What are people's opinions on Brodie?
If SPS goes to Carlton as various media source are reporting then the next midfielder picks are Brodie and Taranto.
If GC take Taranto and we are offered Brodie, do you think we'd take him?
From what I've seen he is a big bodied bull of a contested player, the question is if he is too one dimensional?
If we took him we'd have Neale, Blakely and Brodie who lack secondary dimensions.
I don't think we'd want more than 2 midfielders who couldn't do much other than win contested ball and link up.
If we took him we'd be backing one of Neale, Blakely or Brodie to add additional dimensions to their games,
whether than be outside run, resting forward, tagging, etc.
I like Logue too but he is over hyped.I don't think using pick 7 on brodie would be a good idea. Freo don't exactly have a problem with our midfield with the amount of depth and youth we've got running though there. SPS is likely if still around as he would just be an absolute gun, otherwise freo are likely to go tall with either a logue or english. I'm personally a fan of logue and think he is the second best option other then SPS. Logue can play in the midfield too and be pretty decent (don't know if it was contested ball wise or what I just remember reading it somewhere). But if Freo can be assured that Rotham is avaliable at pick 35 then English would be the better option. So many factors. In conclusion I highly doubt freo will pull the trigger on brodie. I feel that they will use pick 7 on the best non-midfielder still around or SPS.
Funny thread in retrospect, and shows the gap between how we rate players and how the clubs rate them. Imagine the melt today if we had passed on Fyfe for Black.
I like Logue too but he is over hyped.
He possesses the rudimentary traits required to play midfield but he is by no means "able to play midfield", He's played mid once (discounting ruck work).
As a defender his rebound and intercept marking is well and truly overstated. He is definitely, by far, the best key defender in the draft but I don't know if he'd be the best available at pick 7.
It's a secondary part of his package. With his athletic profile and size he hypothetically has the tools to transition into the midfield but it's super hyped.Out of interest, has this been a selling point or sticking point for Logue? I've hadn't even considered him in the midfield and voted for him at pick 7 purely to slot into the back line. Might be short sighted on my behalf but I didn't know him being a midfield option was ever part of the consideration.
Just had a squiz at the 2009 live draft thread when Fyfe's name was read out at pick 20 and I found this post in particular pretty funny
https://bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ffc-draft-day-thread-2009.655467/page-9#post-16352402