- Apr 15, 2013
- 5,139
- 10,764
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
If we were so keen on SPS then I just don't see us trading up to pick 7. Get ready for English.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's the point hey. Fraser or Pendlebury?
Nothing more than a gut feeling...well that and the pressing need for another ruck.What is it about English that has you predicting that?
SPP played for WCE's wafl team, so on our board apparently hes a shit kick, we don't want and hes no good. Poor form really, they're kids who are yet to be given an opportunity.The criticism of all the draftees other than sps on this board is a joke. These kids haven't even been put into the afl system yet and had time to develop and everyone is writing them off. Until they have had a year or two under their belt you won't even know what sort of player they are. They are still kids for gods sake.
Yep - When Boyd went into the ruck it left Dogs with Dickson (184cm) as their main 'tall'. He kicked 3 and they won the premiership. Must get the talent in first, then worry about how many centimeters they are.
Don't get me wrong, English will be a fine ruckman from what I've seen (All Stars game aside where he stunk up the place), but if you had a choice between Scott Pendlebury or Josh Fraser, you pick Pendlebury every day of the week.
haha. He isn't my choice. Just amuses me how naive posters are. The posts I am responding to don't actually contain criticism do they? What they do is state as fact that he is not best available. That he is a reach. That selecting him is a needs based pick, like we should prefer a type of player we don't need.
Most drafts I read rate English extremely highly.
* by the way, is calling me Mrs supposed to be an insult? tsk tsk.
I wanted Hilly and was rapt we grabbed him.Have to go back and check the thread but from memory there were plenty who thought our Stephen had the better upside and how right they were although Rich has been more serviceable than I thought he would be.In 2008 it was almost unanimously decided that choosing Stephen Hill over Daniel Rich was a horrible decision that was a symptom of our incompetent club.
As one of those on the other side of the fence. I'm thinking is more as follows
Why do people think that height being over 195 means that a player goes up 10 spots in the draft. I agree you can't teach tall but neither can you teach quick or smart.
The reports on English are conflicted at best on his tap and overhead work.
So people say we should take him as a tall roaming mid. But if he is not taking contested marks he's just a mid. Now is he a top 10 mid. I would think not.
So the real question is do we draft a genuine top 10 player or a top20 mid who may become a ruck. As there are a few rucks that seem to be good this draft, one or two of who are likely to last to our picks 2 and 3, I'm in favour of best available. Not best "needs" available.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
One year wonderer.I wanted Hilly and was rapt we grabbed him.Have to go back and check the thread but from memory there were plenty who thought our Stephen had the better upside and how right they were although Rich has been more serviceable than I thought he would be.
Generally horse trading is a hard arsed game.
ehh I think it is more that we have pick 7 which would be a huge reach for SPP whereas if we had pick 22 still then we would be talking about taking him at that pick, if he somehow slid to 35 (no chance IMO) then we would grab him straight away like we did Blakely and Balic two years running.SPP played for WCE's wafl team, so on our board apparently hes a shit kick, we don't want and hes no good. Poor form really, they're kids who are yet to be given an opportunity.
The question is simple I think. If we are going best available, is he the 7th best player in the draft? Irrespective of the speculation on his contested marking ability, height, potential, or being the best ruckman in a small pool.He was the only ruckman selected in the All Australian under 18s team. He is regarded as by far the best ruckman available in the draft.
One year wonderer.
Yes their cousin Ian is a gun. Possibly rated as the #1 draft prospect for his age group atm (in u16s).He's pretty dangerous when left without a tag.
However, getting Stephen has meant we were able to get Brad. Also isn't there another Hill brother who is due to come through the system?
I eventually come round to that point. It's interesting how influenced I get by the group think. I sure wanted Daniel rich and Aaron black at the timeI'll be happy whoever the club takes.
Yes their cousin Ian is a gun. Possibly rated as the #1 draft prospect for his age group atm (in u16s).
I was hoping Tapscott
Which doesn't change a lot of opinions overall. Hell if it was Nic Nat & Pendles - guess which one's still more likely to take you to a premiership..Probably closer to Grundy or Pendlebury
Which doesn't change a lot of opinions overall. Hell if it was Nic Nat & Pendles - guess which one's still more likely to take you to a premiership..
Just had a squiz at the 2009 live draft thread when Fyfe's name was read out at pick 20 and I found this post in particular pretty funny
https://bigfooty.com/forum/threads/ffc-draft-day-thread-2009.655467/page-9#post-16352402