My mail from P A is he is a flog and hasn't got a mate there
On SM-G930F using BigFooty.com mobile app
That could mean that all of Port are flogs and he's the only one who's not. It is PORT!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
My mail from P A is he is a flog and hasn't got a mate there
On SM-G930F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Woah. The_Steadier typed lol.
Thats some serious shit.
We have an oblivious need to bring in A grade targeted talent, apart from the cap implications it's just a disappointment if we don't.
If we get it wrong on a trade for one of these guys it is a disaster that goes well beyond the disappointment of having to hit the draft.
Due diligence yeah it sounds great but in reality what does it mean, the clubs aren't allowed to know how many strikes they have. Who do you ask, who can you trust, I mean depending on who you talk to you might be forgiven for thinking you were talking about two different people.
I don't think the saints can afford to get a trade like this wrong so it's a no from me unless we're 100% sure of our facts. I would ask straight up do you have a problem with gambling, drugs etc will you swear a stat dec to that, the AFL can't tell you but you can ask the player.
The player or his agent may tell you to **** off, I think that tells you all you need to know.
LolI'm glad you grasp the gravity of the situation joff
Mark ricciuto thinks not playing him cost port the game.My mail from P A is he is a flog and hasn't got a mate there
On SM-G930F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Who's to stop us, you don't think this goes on in other sports.Wish we said no to Carlisle. And the club would really get away with the stat dec idea. Not.
My issue with Stringer is not off field but his application to the game itself.Wish we said no to Carlisle. And the club would really get away with the stat dec idea. Not.
They're issues you would back yourself in to correct, a bit different from a raging addict or a gambling addicted guy going over the falls.My issue with Stringer is not off field but his application to the game itself.
Undoubted talent. The game is littered with talents who could not commit to getting the best out of themselves.
If he doesnt train hard enough, wont listen to instructions, wont recover from injuries. That would be the issue, not if he played up on his missus or popped a couple of pingas.
I would want him doing his best for the team. All that matters to me.
Who's to stop us, you don't think this goes on in other sports.
So you loose a few who have something to hide, so what.
My issue with Stringer is not off field but his application to the game itself.
Undoubted talent. The game is littered with talents who could not commit to getting the best out of themselves.
If he doesnt train hard enough, wont listen to instructions, wont recover from injuries. That would be the issue, not if he played up on his missus or popped a couple of pingas.
I would want him doing his best for the team. All that matters to me.
They're issues you would back yourself in to correct, a bit different from a raging addict or a gambling addicted guy going over the falls.
How did fev work out for the lions.
Any idea when GWS are going to announce the signing of Kelly..........get on with it, it would be a great fillip for an ailing injury riddled side just the boost they need to get over an elimination final......so when are they going to announce it.
Apparently they've located a guy in a town just north of Newcastle.Any idea when GWS are going to announce the signing of Kelly..........get on with it, it would be a great fillip for an ailing injury riddled side just the boost they need to get over an elimination final......so when are they going to announce it.
Where in the collective bargaining agreement does it prohibit clubs asking a player to do that?.Who is stopping us? The competition. You are not allowed to do it.
There is a few major holes in that guys story,but major one is that GWS wont let Kelly go if they dont get pick1.My Carlton supporting brother is a reader of BF and alerted me to the 'masterplan' that SOS is working on which will result in a trade period looking like:
Gain: Kelly, Schache, Rockliff, Kennedy
Lose: pick 3, Gibbs, pick 38
And I thought the North supporters were the most delusional supporter base on BF...
(For a more complete reading; https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/bluemour-file-rumours-only-no-discussion.1085141/page-16)
Agree with this. We're not recruiting alter boys.Anyway when did our club become hollier than any other club. Who gives a stuff what they are like off the field as long as they can play. We know Stringer can play and I trust the club to get the best out of him. Anyway we can continue with our current list and go nowhere fast or slow.
Where in the collective bargaining agreement does it prohibit clubs asking a player to do that?.
If you think this current young list is in a position where we need to take that kind of risk well your entitled to your opinion.
My position is we don't have any need to take the risk so on balance why bother?.
Who is stopping us? The competition. You are not allowed to do it.
mmmmm...depends who it is.If an afl player was found in a laneway on heroin they would not be an afl player anymore
Carlisle was a stuff up that paid off, that's good luck imho.Are we playing games of who worked and didn't work. How about debating the merit because we can all find examples of who did and didn't work. Carlisle looks ok. Buddy not doing to badly. List goes on.