doona
SMFC
So what can we expect to get for Newman? Do the Blues have a 3rd or 4th rounder to offer?
The article suggested Carlton see him as a DFA as opposed to trading for him. That shows Newman's value really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what can we expect to get for Newman? Do the Blues have a 3rd or 4th rounder to offer?
I don't think it is concerning at all when the player stays at their own club.
It is not like a player we targeted changed clubs or chose GWS over us.
Duryea has chosen the Dogs over us
Rookie upgrades count as taking a spot on the senior list before the draft I believe
again, not how it works.
Rookies are just upgraded. nothing to do with draft picks anymore.
Harry Marsh looking for trade.
Duryea has chosen the Dogs over us
As for the others, Vandnebourg was the only one that I think would've been a good get for us.
The point I'm making is that we're aiming low and failing, that is cause for concern
Harry Marsh looking for trade.
Yes, they do... it just takes a while and a little bit of success. Once they start winning, then players will want to stay. We were the same, remember??? I'm really hopeful that Stewie will be a catalyst for them over the next three years... then Port & Carlton will have to develop their own players!Was interesting on Trade Radio where Port Adelaide & Carlton openly said that whoever GCS draft, they will be looking to get them in a couple of years when they move home. GCS have no chance.
With global warming should be relocated to tassie. At least they would have home support.Was interesting on Trade Radio where Port Adelaide & Carlton openly said that whoever GCS draft, they will be looking to get them in a couple of years when they move home. GCS have no chance.
I don't consider Langdon a B grader. He was, Pies best in a GFI don't think anyone really cares that we missed on Langdon as a player (or Duryea now as well), what is concerning is that we have targeted a heap of B graders and haven't been able to land any of them.
At the same time, the Hawks look like landing 2 a grade midfielders and an ex first round draft pick
What is going on?
I don't consider Langdon a B grader. He was, Pies best in a GF
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
He's not coming now , move on !Agree that he played a great finals series, but he's still a B grader
He'd be a handy pick up for us, but is hardly going to determine whether we are top 4 or not
Harry Marsh looking for trade.
Yes, they do... it just takes a while and a little bit of success. Once they start winning, then players will want to stay. We were the same, remember??? I'm really hopeful that Stewie will be a catalyst for them over the next three years... then Port & Carlton will have to develop their own players!
Makes sense for him if he can find a club to get more game time.
Yes, but it was the same for us... surely you all remember the late 80s and early 90s? People everywhere were saying we should fold, move to Tasmania, that we would never succeed! We would get in players on one or two year contracts and they left asap! Bring in a big name, and he would get injured and sit the season out... It was only the true grit players that stayed, and the ones that were rejected by other clubs. It took us 14 years (1996) to get to a point where we were a realistic chance...The problem is that they get top talent in, get two years of development and then they get poached. They don’t seem to be able to attract high quality players but seem to lose a lot of their drafted top talent that would otherwise build to premiership success.
It seems like it is a never ending cycle of losing the top talent before be getting the continuity in their list in order to challenge so that they can retain this talent.
It’s a concern.
Sinclair and now Clarke and that's about it but the trade ban played a handy part in that.Is it possible that no player, apart from Clarke, wants to play for Longmire in the Grinder machine.
Also that we were spooked by Norf and signed massive and long contracts to so many players and hamstrung our list
I cant remember any player nominating Sydney as their destination, maybe ever since Franklin.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
The AFL should prohibit clubs from approaching contracted players unless granted permission from the players club - excluding last year as a free agent. Currently clubs go straight to the player, the player agrees to that club then nominates the trade - forcing their clubs hand. Would go at least a little way to alleviate thatWas interesting on Trade Radio where Port Adelaide & Carlton openly said that whoever GCS draft, they will be looking to get them in a couple of years when they move home. GCS have no chance.
Northern states rarely get the go home factor let alone being a destination. It happens rarely. The fact that Tippett and Franklin signed up in consecutive years was an anomaly rather than the norm.Is it possible that no player, apart from Clarke, wants to play for Longmire in the Grinder machine.
Also that we were spooked by Norf and signed massive and long contracts to so many players and hamstrung our list
I cant remember any player nominating Sydney as their destination, maybe ever since Franklin.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Yes, but it was the same for us... surely you all remember the late 80s and early 90s? People everywhere were saying we should fold, move to Tasmania, that we would never succeed! We would get in players on one or two year contracts and they left asap! Bring in a big name, and he would get injured and sit the season out... It was only the true grit players that stayed, and the ones that were rejected by other clubs. It took us 14 years (1996) to get to a point where we were a realistic chance...
Give Gold Coast a go... they'll survive and end up being a contender! Bookmark it! (Not really sure what that means as it's a computer, but I'm guessing it's similar to 'mark my words!')