List Mgmt. 2018 Draft thread.

[Horaceg]

Yay GAVE AWAY our second round pick for Murray in the super draft.

Overpaid, let's see how he turns out first. Next years draft is still some time away.

 

[Schraderbrau]

I'd seen some Lukosious highlights you posted somewhere a month of two ago but the way Rankine moves, it's like no one else I can remember seeing. You could say... a faster, more powerful Andrew Krakouer haha.

hill might be better tbh.

 

[Go Woods]

On how they are currently rated id be satisfied with getting Lynch through FA and Quaynor, Kelly and Holt-Fitz.

That's an A+ rating from me if we achieve all of the above.

 

[Duggy31]

Can anyone shed some light for me as I've seen people mentioning that we trade our next 2 first round picks.

Don't the rules state that you must use 2x First Round Picks over a 4 year period?

Meaning trading out 2 FRP's next year is impossible?

Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk

 

[ash84]

If Lynch is Free Agent, why would we have to give up picks to get him?
Won't the Suns just get compensation?

 

[Duggy31]

If Lynch is Free Agent, why would we have to give up picks to get him?
Won't the Suns just get compensation?

The Sun's could potentially match the deal forcing us to have to trade for him. They could out the foot down and ask for 2x first round picks, which I'm pretty sure we would be unable to give them.

Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk

 

[unplugged]

Can anyone shed some light for me as I've seen people mentioning that we trade our next 2 first round picks.

Don't the rules state that you must use 2x First Round Picks over a 4 year period?

Meaning trading out 2 FRP's next year is impossible?

Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk

I'm fairly sure this rule doesn't come in until 2019. I honestly don't know why they need to have the rule when you can only trade one year in advance but anyway.

 

[Chrispiesssss]

Can anyone shed some light for me as I've seen people mentioning that we trade our next 2 first round picks.

Don't the rules state that you must use 2x First Round Picks over a 4 year period?

Meaning trading out 2 FRP's next year is impossible?

Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk

Even though this rule doesn't actually come into effect until 2019. We could also request the AFL (Geelong did for Tuohy).

 

[Matt_352]

Think Suns could be tempted into not matching I hope

 

[ash84]

The Sun's could potentially match the deal forcing us to have to trade for him. They could out the foot down and ask for 2x first round picks, which I'm pretty sure we would be unable to give them.

Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk

Cheers thanks for clearing that up.

 

[ash84]

So we’re getting Quaynor, Kelly, Holt-Fitz, Sloane and Lynch next off season.

Sign me up.

 

[Soups]

So we’re getting Quaynor, Kelly, Holt-Fitz, Sloane and Lynch next off season.

Sign me up.

And Lukosius.

 

[Matt_352]

And Lukosius.

Dont forget Rankine

 

[Saintly Viewed]

Oh you meant the lesser Super Draft

Two relative top ten type picks (sort of) and a Brown (has the attitude and application)

What's not to love so far

 

[left at home]

So we’re getting Quaynor, Kelly, Holt-Fitz, Sloane and Lynch next off season.

Sign me up.

And McDonald too as well

 

[loki04]

I'm fairly sure this rule doesn't come in until 2019. I honestly don't know why they need to have the rule when you can only trade one year in advance but anyway.

Was to deter teams from continually doing it 2 firsts then in 12-24 months doing either another 1st or 2 firsts again, forgoing 3-4 years worth of first rounders depending on how your team performs could see you completely destroy your clubs future playing group.

If a club thinks its 1 -2 players off a flag and buys them over 3 years but fails to land a flag then falls off a cliff (due to age, form, changing game styles) they would have nothing coming through underneath. Basically it is to prevent clubs shooting themselves in the foot.
Think of the position Carlton were in after 99/00 seasons and then the draft sanctions hit them forked them for a decade.

 

[loki04]

Dont forget Rankine

and Ian Hill, has Daniel Wells esque talent.

 

[Horaceg]

So we’re getting Quaynor, Kelly, Holt-Fitz, Sloane and Lynch next off season.

Sign me up.

So need to create some additional list spots or will they create themselves?

Blair and Oxley have been given chances but they would be early front runners, Smith could be there about, then we have some of the elder Statesmen, Dunn, Goldy, Levi, Mayne, Varcoe, Wells

 

[Go Pies!!!!!]

Throw the money at Lynch and if they choose to match walk away will cost us to much

 

[jackcass]

Was to deter teams from continually doing it 2 firsts then in 12-24 months doing either another 1st or 2 firsts again, forgoing 3-4 years worth of first rounders depending on how your team performs could see you completely destroy your clubs future playing group.

If a club thinks its 1 -2 players off a flag and buys them over 3 years but fails to land a flag then falls off a cliff (due to age, form, changing game styles) they would have nothing coming through underneath. Basically it is to prevent clubs shooting themselves in the foot.
Think of the position Carlton were in after 99/00 seasons and then the draft sanctions hit them forked them for a decade.

Carlton forked for any period of time always a good thing.

 

[Saintly Viewed]

Carlton forked for any period of time always a good thing.

Really can't stand Carlton

 

[Horaceg]

Carlton forked for any period of time always a good thing.

All periods of time is better

 

[Horaceg]

Really can't stand Carlton

Saintly and wise

 

[iGNITER]

So we’re getting Quaynor, Kelly, Holt-Fitz, Sloane and Lynch next off season.

Sign me up.

Not out of reach.

 

[Horaceg]

Not out of reach.

With some creative contracting, front end, tail end loaded balancing.