It is, but its the socially acceptable kind.
Reverse racism or positive discrimination?
I’m ok with that. It’s hard enough working out what you’re not allowed to say these days..
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It is, but its the socially acceptable kind.
Reverse racism or positive discrimination?
I’m ok with that. It’s hard enough working out what you’re not allowed to say these days..
I decided to delete that last line.
I don't seen an issue at all with saying it'd be nice to actually draft some indigenous guys. On average they're much more creative players and we've got plenty of hard nosed guys in the team but very little ability to make something out of nothing.
Don’t know. First someone would actually have to say we need to draft more white guys. Then another someone would need to decide whether they had an issue with the first person saying it.Would it be an issue to say we needed to draft some more white guys? On average they're much more dependable players and we've got plenty of white-nosed guys in the team but very little ability to make nothing out of something.
Weird to say we’re taking a punt on then with late picks though isn’t it.I don't seen an issue at all with saying it'd be nice to actually draft some indigenous guys. On average they're much more creative players and we've got plenty of hard nosed guys in the team but very little ability to make something out of nothing.
Would it be an issue to say we needed to draft some more white guys?
Sorry dude...this reverse racism card can't be played by white people as they are the main power, and the majority.
Sorry dude...this reverse racism card can't be played by white people as they are the main power, and the majority.
So braveWhat if you're from Irish descent? My first ancestors in Australia were a minority that was also oppressed by the british. I'll play whatever card I please.
So brave
Serong And Young will be the 2 we will be watching closely. Don't be surprised if Flanders comes into calculations as a Smokey.Who do you think the club will be selecting with Pick 3?
hello darkness my old friendBetter pay more attention to this thread, seeing how we're getting very involved with the draft
Lewis retired and Garlett was delisted, but Langdon and Tomlinson filled those spots. Sam Frost then departed.
We have three draft picks so it looks likely two more players will need to go. Stretch and JKH? I think pretty much every other play is signed.
Lewis retired and Garlett was delisted, but Langdon and Tomlinson filled those spots. Sam Frost then departed.
We have three draft picks so it looks likely two more players will need to go. Stretch and JKH? I think pretty much every other play is signed.
I posted it just before in the Trade thread, but instead of comparing the Ins to the Outs, just count the list. Last year we went with 38 (rather than the max 40) on the senior list, and filled with rookies. Rookies that we've now delisted, so we can go back to 40 on the senior list again. We're currently at 37, so that's the mandatory 3 slots for draft picks sorted, with 4 CatA rookies, and 1 CatB.Maynard was promoted at some point, so he is off the main list, too. Otherwise we've got a lot of rookie spots available.
Only need two.The AFL website shows us with only two picks ( 3 and 8). Are we required to have three draft picks on the night. Sorry, but not sure how all this works. West Coast only have two also.
Someone mentioned in the other thread the draft keeps going after the rounds listed on the website. So we can make our third pick at the end of the draftThe AFL website shows us with only two picks ( 3 and 8). Are we required to have three draft picks on the night. Sorry, but not sure how all this works. West Coast only have two also.