Training 2021 Pre-Season Training Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

As I said, he's got talent and players with talent will always have good games.

Time to do that more consistently

If we finally give him more than 4 games in a row and he doesn't move on an upward trend, there will be warning signs for sure.

If we continue to swing him from AFL to SANFL week after week we will reap what we sow
 
I think that excuse is only going to last so long.
TBH, in a season like this I just want to see us put a minimum of 12 straight games into Darcy to see what happens. Ideally just set and forget all season and see if he string's some games together that would suggest we have something going forward.

Bottom line is I just don't want to be having this conversation next offseason. Lets figure it out once and for all, even if it means sacrificing a KPF position for a season.
 
TBH, in a season like this I just want to see us put a minimum of 12 straight games into Darcy to see what happens. Ideally just set and forget all season and see if he string's some games together that would suggest we have something going forward.

Bottom line is I just don't want to be having this conversation next offseason. Lets figure it out once and for all, even if it means sacrificing a KPF position for a season.
My thoughts as I noted elsewhere is to play Fog at FF as a lead out forward. Then at CHF have a big ranging marking target there which at the moment is probably Himmelberg but hoping for it soon to be Thilthorpe - a guy that can get around the ground but also take contested marks and mark the ball with a strength of marking the ball at the highest point.

Then with guys like McAdam who can also take contested marks, it might dictate that the oppo go 3rd man up and that could open up space for Fogarty to lead into and use his strengths. Give him 6 shots for goal a game inside 50 and I'll wager he goals from 4 of them. What I am really saying is we need to put the right structure in place to help him do what he can do and that is lead, mark and score goals and in Thilthorpe, I believe we have the player in the very near future to perfectly compliment Fog up there
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Can't wait to see Fog, Tex, Lynch, and Himmelberg all in the forward 50 this week.....


With McAdam playing a 3rd tall, we don't even need 2 of the above.

My ideal forward line is Fog, Berg, TThorpe, McAdam, Rowe, and a couple of resting mids.

Tex and Lynch either on the wing or break glass.
Still not a lot of defensive pressure in your forwardline either.
 
My thoughts as I noted elsewhere is to play Fog at FF as a lead out forward. Then at CHF have a big ranging marking target there which at the moment is probably Himmelberg but hoping for it soon to be Thilthorpe - a guy that can get around the ground but also take contested marks and mark the ball with a strength of marking the ball at the highest point.

Then with guys like McAdam who can also take contested marks, it might dictate that the oppo go 3rd man up and that could open up space for Fogarty to lead into and use his strengths. Give him 6 shots for goal a game inside 50 and I'll wager he goals from 4 of them. What I am really saying is we need to put the right structure in place to help him do what he can do and that is lead, mark and score goals and in Thilthorpe, I believe we have the player in the very near future to perfectly compliment Fog up there
The only chance Fog has is as a lead up at the ball full forward. He can't play at half forward. He can't play as a CHF. Anytime spent trying that is lost time.
 
The only chance Fog has is as a lead up at the ball full forward. He can't play at half forward. He can't play as a CHF. Anytime spent trying that is lost time.
Maybe so..that is why I suggest he play as THE full forward but he needs a structure around him to allow his game to flourish and I think we have the players there to allow him to do that
 
Still not a lot of defensive pressure in your forwardline either.


True, hoping the HFF can provide a bit.

In that case however, I think McAdam has the x factor you need in a forward line, and TT is an obvious starter once ready (we hope). Need one more tall so Berg/Frampton or Fog as a leading forward.

Either way the club needs to settle the structure there, and I think Tex and Lynch are holding that up. Though I can definitely understand why at least Tex will be picked early on this year given pre-season form.
 
True, hoping the HFF can provide a bit.

In that case however, I think McAdam has the x factor you need in a forward line, and TT is an obvious starter once ready (we hope). Need one more tall so Berg/Frampton or Fog as a leading forward.

Either way the club needs to settle the structure there, and I think Tex and Lynch are holding that up. Though I can definitely understand why at least Tex will be picked early on this year given pre-season form.
See I think Tex plays..... At the moment. Not all year though. Have Fog and TT around him with the 3 smalls.
 
Not ideal but how about lynch to defence as an undersized KPD? Especially with Talia out we’re very light on for experience back there
I don't know how to feel about that. I suppose he's got the tank, height, mobility and footy smarts to play a new role. I wouldn't put him on a stay at home 105kg FF, but to run with an athletic leading CHF, I mean sure, I could potentially see it.
 
I don't know how to feel about that. I suppose he's got the tank, height, mobility and footy smarts to play a new role. I wouldn't put him on a stay at home 105kg FF, but to run with an athletic leading CHF, I mean sure, I could potentially see it.

Lynch to Rohan but they both have to play in the shade the whole game
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Still not a lot of defensive pressure in your forwardline either.

No, however, there isn't anyone on our list capable of both defence and offence at a good level in our forward line, outside of McAdam.

I hope Newchurch figures it out because he could walk straight into this side.
 
Not ideal but how about lynch to defence as an undersized KPD? Especially with Talia out we’re very light on for experience back there

I don't think Lynch has ever played KPD (or at least, not for a decade by this point), so we're probably better sticking with McAsey/Butts.
 
I don't think Lynch has ever played KPD (or at least, not for a decade by this point), so we're probably better sticking with McAsey/Butts.
Only person that thought Tommy was a KPD was Ross Lyon hence Tommy seeking a trade...He's always been essentially a 3rd tall forward right back from his junior career for the Sandringham Dragons.
 
Can't wait to see Fog, Tex, Lynch, and Himmelberg all in the forward 50 this week.....


With McAdam playing a 3rd tall, we don't even need 2 of the above.

My ideal forward line is Fog, Berg, TThorpe, McAdam, Rowe, and a couple of resting mids.

Tex and Lynch either on the wing or break glass.
I would just copy Richmond and go Thilthorpe and Himmelberg with 4 smalls/mediums. The days of 3 talls are effectively over. Forward pressure wins games along with players that run in lines. Richmond showed that last night.
 
I would just copy Richmond and go Thilthorpe and Himmelberg with 4 smalls/mediums. The days of 3 talls are effectively over. Forward pressure wins games along with players that run in lines. Richmond showed that last night.
The issue with that is our balance. We don't have the cattle to play small, unless you want to bring Murphy back in.
 
The issue with that is our balance. We don't have the cattle to play small, unless you want to bring Murphy back in.


FF: Rowe ~ Himmelberg ~ McAdam

hF: McHenry ~ Thilthorpe ~ Sloane
 
Berg and RT play the exact same role, that won't work.

You just said the issue was the smalls...

The issue with that is our balance. We don't have the cattle to play small, unless you want to bring Murphy back in.

And I don't believe Himmelberg and RT play the same role. EH stays closer to goal, RT uses his running capacity to push higher up the ground.
 
See I think Tex plays..... At the moment. Not all year though. Have Fog and TT around him with the 3 smalls.
Yep.. for that tall forwards i’d have tex and TT working from centre half forward up the ground though.. both are mobile enough..

Have Fog one out and leading from the goal square into space in the 50..

With himm (if he can get his shit together again) or frampton being the eventual replacement for a retired tex..
 
We needed to go for Ash or the best mid available at pick 4 in 2019. Last year we should have taken Heath Chapman at pick 11 who will be a much better player than McAsey imo. Ogilvie should be done.

The trade with GWS was the right choice. That draft was a very difficult one, after the clear top 2 of Rowell and Anderson, there was a big drop off in talent. The players taken in the top 10 probably struggle to make the top 10 in most other drafts. We gambled on getting a top 2 pick, but were thwarted by the incompetence of Gold Coast and Melbourne. From there we were in an awkward position.

That draft will probably end up being similar to the 2007 draft, where by the best talents are just as likely to come in the 10-20 range as the top 10, and probably extend really well out to about 30-35 like the 2009 draft did.

The initial trade was a good one we just picked the wrong player, I think I was wanting either Serong, Young or Flanders.

Flanders I reckon was quite overrated by the simple fact that there were very few mid 180s midfielders available.

Young and Serong were probably the 2 we should have been looking at. Serong I really liked, the trouble being though, he was more of the same 178cm midfielder/forward and I reckon in time Shoenberg will probably match him and we got him in the 20's. Young had a beautiful kick, but again is probably limited to HBF, and similar to McAsey really, do you want to be spending such a high draft pick on a back flanker?

It was really one of those drafts you'd prefer almost to have a pick in the teens, whereby you'd feel comfortable taking a bit of a punt. As a draft it was probably hurt by Tom Green being academy linked and Brodie Kemp doing his knee.

I believe that was the rumour, but that one had us moving down from 6 to like 10, which was our original 1st rounder. I think they'd only offer a 2nd rounder, we wanted a 1st, so it didn't go anywhere and Carlton traded it to the Suns for pick 17 and 22 instead.

In hindsight we probably should have traded back again, but given we had already traded our pick 4 back to 6, it would have been a very hard sell to board/members etc if we traded back further.

Ultimately, whilst its easy to be critical of the McAsey selection using hindsight, I don't think it was an easy selection to be making and ultimately it simpley wasn't ideal for us as a club to be selecting at that point. We needed genuine elite level midfielders +/- an elite potential Key Forward, those simply weren't available. Shuffle back to pick 10/11 in the draft and you're probably comfortable taking a punt on Day or Georgiades and gain another selection, but selling that to the members/board is not so easy.
 
The trade with GWS was the right choice. That draft was a very difficult one, after the clear top 2 of Rowell and Anderson, there was a big drop off in talent. The players taken in the top 10 probably struggle to make the top 10 in most other drafts. We gambled on getting a top 2 pick, but were thwarted by the incompetence of Gold Coast and Melbourne. From there we were in an awkward position.
There were 2 things which really hurt us - neither of which were Gold Coast and Melbourne.

The first was Carlton sacking Brendan Bolton mid-season, with David Teague getting a dead cat bounce from the team (who were just relieved to have Bolton gone), resulting in them winning 3 of their last 6 games, and jumping ahead of Melbourne in the process.

The second, was the AFL randomly deciding to give Gold Coast a priority draft pick - despite none of their problems being due to a lack of high draft picks. Without this Rowell was an Adelaide Crow.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Training 2021 Pre-Season Training Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top