- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Best case is we trade up 3 or 4 spots?No way. Best case our future first ends up at 15-16, which becomes a wash if next year's draft is better. Worst case it's a top 10 pick in a better draft and we have ****ed up badly again. As George W Bush would say, fool me once, shame on... ... Won't get fooled again!
Wonder if any clubs who finished outside the 8 last year will be interested in giving up their 2023 1st for Sydney's pick 14 which will probably end up being 15 or 16?Best case is we trade up 3 or 4 spots?
That’s the thing though, they would only do it if they really rate the kid. Picking Stocker is bad recruiting/drafting it doesn’t mean the trade was bad.You'd want to be pretty sure on the player to take your trade risk though. This is my point. Last time when we traded down what should have been pick 3 the following year to get Stocker was a shocking outcome in hindsight.
Yup have heard that before same tired observation every new draft cohort a little stagnant.How often do we hear that next years draft is better than this years draft, and how often does that actually eventuate?
Perhaps portrayed wrong impression top 5 are talented no doubt, but we won’t get close, as in every draft , subsequently one will need plenty of luck.You’re talking as though there won’t be any good players in this draft class, which is absurd given how glowing you’ve been in your praise of certain prospects.
The stocker trade is a good case study. A list boss/ manager completely absorbed by the value of the trade. Got an off piste chance at personal glory... footy press loved the 'strategy' of it all, what a move, rah rah.You'd want to be pretty sure on the player to take your trade risk though. This is my point. Last time when we traded down what should have been pick 3 the following year to get Stocker was a shocking outcome in hindsight.
Does he still work for us then?harry hindsight - the greatest list manager of all time.............
no! that's his cousin, harry high-pants...........fmd........
Keeler or George.Who would you be selecting at pick 15 though? Sydney are clearly flagging what common sense was telling us leading into the combine: you're looking at a top 5-6, then a group down to about 14, then you're in more of a niche/riskier pool until the end of the second round.
Way too early for both. Likewise, too early for Hotton as suggested earlier, maybe even Allan unless they think his kicking on the run is under control.Keeler or George.
Nice number 1.
Clark as your highest rated is predicted to go 6-8, if he’s there at 8, what would you offer to get up the extra 2-3 spots to get him?
That's ok if the player is of similiar talent. An extra year is irrelevant in a lot of cases. We've got 5 years into Dow.You gotta wait 12 months longer for it though, so evens it up a bit where you can get a season of senior experience and game plan into them
I wouldn’t mind getting some of Sydney’s 2023 picks, they were mauled in the GF and those scars could stick for sometime
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Agree with that.The stocker trade is a good case study. A list boss/ manager completely absorbed by the value of the trade. Got an off piste chance at personal glory... footy press loved the 'strategy' of it all, what a move, rah rah.
Both sides of the trade were sh*t.
You (as a club) have to back yourself in on a kid that has genuine belief/insecurity combined with a willingness to put in the hard yards, hard to pick up on. A well spoken interview means not much often. Have dumb sh!ts come through our grad program all the time that talk a huge game quite well, then go and burn their finger on the coffee machine because they are not sure if the milk comes out hot or not. #Gamble responsibly / intuitively Austin & Co.
That's ok if the player is of similiar talent. An extra year is irrelevant in a lot of cases. We've got 5 years into Dow.
Would you rather have got an extra year into a kid from the 2017 draft, or waited for Walsh in 2018? We had no idea we were going to be so bad in 2018 and that highlights the risk of trading out of a stronger draft.
Sydney are a smart club. If they want more picks next year at the expense of this one, I'd back them over posters here.
SOS went to the US because it’s a junket these type of people get the benefit of. 14 year olds who follow American sport already know everything that SOS could learn from sitting at home on the computer.Agree with that.
SOS went to the US to "study" how live trading was done when it was being introduced here. Came back and did it immediately just because he could.
2017 top 30 is probably as good as or better then 2018 so unless you were guaranteed a top 7 pick (which you wouldn’t be) then it wouldn’t matter much.That's ok if the player is of similiar talent. An extra year is irrelevant in a lot of cases. We've got 5 years into Dow.
Would you rather have got an extra year into a kid from the 2017 draft, or waited for Walsh in 2018? We had no idea we were going to be so bad in 2018 and that highlights the risk of trading out of a stronger draft.
Sydney are a smart club. If they want more picks next year at the expense of this one, I'd back them over posters here.
And reasonably thought we would improve in 2019.He done the trade because we rated Stoker too high, simple as that.
Agree with that.
SOS went to the US to "study" how live trading was done when it was being introduced here. Came back and did it immediately just because he could.
Understand your logic, but Carlton 2017/18 compared to 2023 is like comparing chalk and cheese Earl.Would you rather have got an extra year into a kid from the 2017 draft, or waited for Walsh in 2018? We had no idea we were going to be so bad in 2018 and that highlights the risk of trading out of a stronger draft.
In the mix: The Hollands-Blues link has been strong for weeks — and was only strengthened when coach Michael Voss this week suggested the club wanted a player to “balance” the array of inside midfielders already at the club. It’s why the Blues could also launch a bid on Brisbane father-son prospect and gun outside midfielder Jaspa Fletcher — the son of Voss’ former teammate Adrian Fletcher — earlier than anticipated. Ed Allan is considered to be right in the Blues’ thinking, but there’s also speculation they haven’t ruled out the possibility of a key defender, which would bring East Perth’s Jedd Busslinger and Eastern Ranges’ Lewis Hayes into the mix. But the key-position trigger might only be pulled if the Blues find a suitor on draft night to split their pick into two — a whisper that’s been doing the rounds for a few days. Sydney has been tipped as the club that would most likely do a deal with the Blues.