- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Stocker rated Stocker too high.SOS went to the US because it’s a junket these type of people get the benefit of. 14 year olds who follow American sport already know everything that SOS could learn from sitting at home on the computer.
He done the trade because we rated Stoker too high, simple as that.
My mail has Essendon taking Phillipou.
Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
My mail says a truck carrying wigs overturned on the highway…police are combing the area.My mail says I can buy one traditional pizza and get a second one for half price.
myblueroan I’m disappointed
What % chance does Humphrey slide though? There'd have to be a huge bolter and personally I can't see anyone jumping up the order.If Humphrey slid to our first and the Dogs went Busslinger I'd be all for trading out of next years draft to Syd for 14. The following teams needs would likely mean Holland's makes it to 14.
10 - Humphrey
14 - Holland's
29 - Take your pick... Richards, Keeler, Monkira, Binns etc
If the clubs extremely bullish on the Campo twins id think they'd be happy to trade out of 2024 come next year to allow us to still to pick up some players in 2023.
Holland's and Humphrey would be an exceptional outcome. Both players that fit the roles we need filled at the moment and both very good players.
Rate Darcy Jones very highly. The only “knock” is size. At 175cm, he is a “small”. If you are good enough, you are tall enough. The question is that we have long term staples in Fisher, Durdin and Motlop already “entrenched”, do we have room for another sub 180cm forward/mid type? Only our brains trust know their thoughts on that.What do draft watchers think of Darcy Jones?
Ideally seeing we're taking Hollands at 11, I'd want a KPP like Keeler or Gruzewski at our second pick. But I think that realistically someone like Darcy Jones, Charlie Clarke or Blake Drury would be nice.Hypothetically, we keep our picks and take Hollands with our first, realistically who would be available at our second pick that we would want?
Edit: I can see why we'd like to trade up for an earlier 2nd pick...
Oi! Not me.myblueroan I’m disappointed
He won’t last anywhere near our second pick from what I’ve heard.Rate Darcy Jones very highly. The only “knock” is size. At 175cm, he is a “small”. If you are good enough, you are tall enough. The question is that we have long term staples in Fisher, Durdin and Motlop already “entrenched”, do we have room for another sub 180cm forward/mid type? Only our brains trust know their thoughts on that.
I would not have a problem if he was our second pick in the draft.
He would/could if our desire for another pick resulted in us trading an F2 (plus) for *’s #22.He won’t last anywhere near our second pick from what I’ve heard.
I agree with your point though - even if we loved him, he’s not really a type we’d be in the market for.
Completely agree with this sentiment, though Humphrey is more wishful thinking vs a genuine chance. Hope I’m wrong!If Humphrey slid to our first and the Dogs went Busslinger I'd be all for trading out of next years draft to Syd for 14. The following teams needs would likely mean Holland's makes it to 14.
10 - Humphrey
14 - Holland's
29 - Take your pick... Richards, Keeler, Monkira, Binns etc
If the clubs extremely bullish on the Campo twins id think they'd be happy to trade out of 2024 come next year to allow us to still to pick up some players in 2023.
Holland's and Humphrey would be an exceptional outcome. Both players that fit the roles we need filled at the moment and both very good players.
It sounds like you’d have to get at least 22 to have any chance.He would/could if our desire for another pick resulted in us trading an F2 (plus) for *’s #22.
So much conversation if one of Sydney’s picks, but that will cost F1, which we would be reluctant to pay.
I think for us Carlton fans it has been fairly predictable since the rebuild started in the 2015 draft (in terms of our first pick). That one was exciting because we had 3 picks in the top 12.Is this an exciting draft because it’s pretty even and therefore one bolter can change the top 12. dramatically?
Or simply it has been a while since we had multiple picks? With the possibility to trade too?
Exciting times
If Humphrey slid to our first and the Dogs went Busslinger I'd be all for trading out of next years draft to Syd for 14. The following teams needs would likely mean Holland's makes it to 14.
10 - Humphrey
14 - Holland's
29 - Take your pick... Richards, Keeler, Monkira, Binns etc
If the clubs extremely bullish on the Campo twins id think they'd be happy to trade out of 2024 come next year to allow us to still to pick up some players in 2023.
Holland's and Humphrey would be an exceptional outcome. Both players that fit the roles we need filled at the moment and both very good players.
If we did this, I think we could miss out on Hollands and could possibly end up with a combination like Weddle and Hewett... Wouldn't mind that...interesting comment from Swans board....
"Rumour is we're close to getting Carlton's pick 10. Seems it's something like pick 10 & F2nd for pick 14&17"
Oh get stuffed, can't just make me fall in love with Hollands and then pull the rug out from under me and we get someone else.interesting comment from Swans board....
"Rumour is we're close to getting Carlton's pick 10. Seems it's something like pick 10 & F2nd for pick 14&17"
Could we somehow get #29 upgraded?If we did this, I think we could miss out on Hollands and could possibly end up with a combination like Weddle and Hewett... Wouldn't mind that...
I am just chewing it over in my mind, and would prefer however to keep our '10' (11), somehow get 1 of the Swans picks, keep our '29', and end up with Hollands, Hewett (or Hotton), then Keeler...
interesting comment from Swans board....
"Rumour is we're close to getting Carlton's pick 10. Seems it's something like pick 10 & F2nd for pick 14&17"
I'd love your first paragraph to be correct. As ABOD has said, "can't just make me fall in love with Hollands and then pull the rug out from under me"... But what will be will be... Whatever happens, I do believe we will get players who will value add to our list...If we did this I would I hope we have decent intel that Hollands will still be there.
Then we take Hotton with 17, Hayes (if he keeps sliding) at 29, and Scully at 49. Rock and roll.