The Royal Sampler
Floreat Pica, Bitch!
Potentially Will Verrall or Phoenix Foster
Verrall is the one, thanks for the reminder!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Potentially Will Verrall or Phoenix Foster
I’ll see myself out when we select him tonightWhere’s the attitude problems come from?
If you listen to him speak he is probably the most professional of the whole draft crop. He even said himself he was probably trying to overdo his workload too much.
Also seems content moving. At a time when many draftees seem willing to openly state their preference to stay home.
I only see the Pick 7 trade as madness if Bowes becomes a player - if Bowes doesn't have any impact as a player, then the Cats are effectively paying Pick7 in excess of $2M for the next 4 years and sustaining a list clogger. Only time will tell if that was a gift.Probably send Matt Rowell and a box of Roses chocolates to them as a good luck gift. That pick 7 gift was madness
Bowes contract was the mad part reallyI only see the Pick 7 trade as madness if Bowes becomes a player - if Bowes doesn't have any impact as a player, then the Cats are effectively paying Pick7 in excess of $2M for the next 4 years and sustaining a list clogger. Only time will tell if that was a gift.
Yeah, but you can't separate them.Bowes contract was the mad part really
Grundy has better, aerobic capacity, mobility, and ground ball/stoppage impact than either. If he played in the PF, we win as others have said.
To my eye that Verrall who may well have gone higher if he had been playing regular,they have him listed at 199cm but he has quite a leap on him, Like Knobel I would happy to get him at 51.Yes that’s the one.
I think Verrall could potentially be a good KPP with his leap & athletic traits. Would not mind if he is taken with our lastI think you could be thinking of Verrall he looked a good prospect, I have heard his name mentioned before re Collingwood.
I think fly rates Ruckman highly but not one that doesn't offer any marking power. Barnett looks every bit a potential KPP, he could easily play as a defender or forward. Barnett has much more versatilityGo back - you’ll see this discussion started when I suggested Barnett would not be our first pick, as McCrae doesn’t rate a Ruckman as our Top priority.
I do the Welcome Theads
He was never going to say otherwiseHine is taking the best player, albeit tall or small.
He was pretty good in the 2018 prelim from memory but i think i remember that because of the towelling up he got the following weekGrundy has never been the difference between winning and losing a final. Hickey would have shown him up in the final
Grundy has never been the difference between winning and losing a final. Hickey would have shown him up in the final
Why not , it's always worked in the past for him. I suppose you don't look as bad if you don't take a KPP and he doesn't make it as compared to taking a flanker who would be just another player on the scrap heap. We can only hope that the rest of the team have some inputHine is taking the best player, albeit tall or small.
Hine sounded pretty keen to get rid of 16. Mentioned a top group of 12 or so, but then later alluded to things evening up around pick 15 into the 20s.
That's probably to avoid taking Ryan with 16, everyone else seems to think 16 for Ryan is laughableHine sounded pretty keen to get rid of 16. Mentioned a top group of 12 or so, but then later alluded to things evening up around pick 15 into the 20s.
I think Derek is open to trading 16 or 27 into 2023 if the players he rates highly are gone by then. Said he has 4 or 5 in that first pick bracket, which includes Ryan… whilst also mentioning Weddle and CowanHine was asked about trading 16 into the top 10 or thereabouts and he more or less said it had proven impossible, with only some clubs having the currency to do so, i.e. Melbourne.
Surprisingly they didn't ask him about the potential of trading it backwards, because his answer IMO (and I could be reading too much into it) left it as an option.
What about 16, 25 and 27 to GWS for 18, 19 and 31...
(unless a genuine slider is sitting there at 16)
Edit: yes, I know the picks will have slid back by then
I think Derek is open to trading 16 or 27 into 2023 if the players he rates highly are gone by then. Said he has 4 or 5 in that first pick bracket, which includes Ryan… whilst also mentioning Weddle and Cowan
You’d assume they’re 3 of the 5 he likes, but was cryptic by saying they’re all in a HBF group around the 15 - 20 range. but still wonder if he’s avoiding mentioning a player like Hayes for v good reason.So we’re after a half-back… pick a bloody good one, Dekka.