Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not worth the riskMichalanney's not being bid on in the 1st round...
Do we need to delist a player to open up a spot though?. If so, we should know soon enough if we are eying a player in this draft for our main listProbably completely wrong, but I somehow feel more confident about a trade back into this year's first round now. 2 early seconds for next year is a decent bargaining chip
Ha..it would be karma if they did after us bidding on multiple academy players of theirsnot worth the risk
gws have interest at pick 16
We don't apparently. Rookies don't need to be upgraded until the same list lodgement where players can be downgraded also.Do we need to delist a player to open up a spot though?. If so, we should know soon enough if we are eying a player in this draft for our main list
strong rumoursHa..it would be karma if they did after us bidding on multiple academy players of theirs
To be fair, both Salmon and McAdam were during the State League eraAdrian McAdam
I think that rule only applies to the number of picks brought into the draft - I've not seen anything that it applies once the draft is underway.Dont we need the list spots though if we wanted to split say pick 46 for points?
no they changed thatDont we need the list spots though if we wanted to split say pick 46 for points?
Says who?not worth the risk
gws have interest at pick 16
Yeah, but where did they take Aleer last year?Says who?
Why on earth would they go that high when higher rated defenders will likely be available in that range i.e. Josh Weddle, Lewis Hayes, Henry Hustwaite, Lachlan Cowan or Max Gruzewski.
They also drafted Cam Fleeton and Josh Fahey last year both defenders, don't see them going for a physically underdeveloped 3rd tal/mediuml defender at this timeYeah, but where did they take Aleer last year?
I said it a few days back..Probably completely wrong, but I somehow feel more confident about a trade back into this year's first round now. 2 early seconds for next year is a decent bargaining chip
Did you see his father play? Reckon he's about the same size....his dad was a string bean for his entire career.He's decent, but raw (body wise). He's 2-3 years minimum from AFL
Was thinking the same, especially if clubs thinl North will finish bottom and they could score coveted pick 1 in the second round.Probably completely wrong, but I somehow feel more confident about a trade back into this year's first round now. 2 early seconds for next year is a decent bargaining chip
gws or hawks are finishing lastWas thinking the same, especially if clubs thinl North will finish bottom and they could score coveted pick 1 in the second round.
Will also hold some weight if we trade it next year for a player.
We could recontract 15 and still have seven delistings.That you continue to believe the club has some clue is a nice one to watch
Out of those uncontracted players watch us re-contract 15 and be tight again
Okay, have him.not worth the risk
gws have interest at pick 16
Given our lack of list spots, I gather we would look to trade out picks if MM slides for future picks.Those 3 picks will match a bid at 22 or later.
If after 29 we get to keep and potentially use 59
If after 41 we get to keep 56 & 59
I'm guessing if we have to match a bid before 22 it will also push out next year's pick 23, roughly 1-for-1.
So they're bottom 3 essentially?gws or hawks are finishing last
north will be 16th or 17th
GWS will be vastly improved next year. There's no reason they won't be pushing for the eight. It was a great move getting rid of their oversupply of midfielders.gws or hawks are finishing last
north will be 16th or 17th
what makes you think that?GWS will be vastly improved next year. There's no reason they won't be pushing for the eight. It was a great move getting rid of their oversupply of midfielders.
No need to delist - there is a window for moving players from the senior list, to the rookie list, between the ND and RD.I'm hoping we also delist Seedsman and then sign him as a DFA to the rookie list at the same time (is that the process now, Vader?).
Possible... but unlikely. Depends on who is left in the draft. Last year they thought Nankervis was too good not to take, but most years there's no PSD at all.That gives us a list spot, and for the 2nd year in a row we could take a player in the PSD, whoever we feel is the best undrafted player (Verrall? Lemmie? Ryan?).
This is plausible. Of course, it assumes that Seedsman is willing to go on the LTI list (or better yet, the inactive list). Seedsman is still under the delusion that he will one day be able to play AFL football again.We take someone in the rookie draft and then we move Seedsman to the LTI list and sign Turner.
It could still be interesting, but not til day 2 ...