- Nov 7, 2018
- 2,165
- 7,060
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
There's a lot of good stuff here.No wouldn't be happy, but it would make me question our list management and player development that he became a potential trade target.
I have the same questions with Logue:
I think the club has been quite happy to consider all of the players considering moving as trade bait. No point having a go at the likes of Lobb, Acres, Logue or Meek. Or even Young.
- Why wasn't he contracted earlier in the year? To me it tells the player we are not fully committed to him (and perhaps we weren't).
- Why, after advertising that we would put players in the positions they perform best in, do we suddenly ride a different horse with a player and expect anything less than him looking for a trade?
The club has a major role in all of this. It's a long way from the situation with Neale or Weller where the club was wrong footed.
Logue is leaving for a discounted price because the club hadn't valued him highly enough...end of story.
That's not criticism, as all clubs need to navigate the wilds of player movement, the salary cap and the psyches of professional athletes. It's just that, in this case, the timing of Logue's form resurgence and the fact we had been willing to let him drift into a a contract year, has conspired to a point where we are currently looking like getting a lot less for him than we would have liked.
That's on us. Not Logue, not the AFL, not North Melbourne, not Colin Young or any other bit part player in this drama.
Anytime a club lets a player enter the final year of their contract they are rolling the dice.
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.