Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,424
- 88,095
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Thanks for making this an awesome trade period peeps. Will be locking this thread later tonight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Banking up a lot of F2,F3 is a great idea.I’d just trade out our F1 to whoever for their highest bid.
Then offer Melb and F2 from north and leave it at that.
I’d prefer to bypass this years draft and stock capital next year. We will get Gold Coasts first if we have enough round 2s so that they can bank points for their academy.
Banking up a lot of F2,F3 is a great idea.
Gold Coast has 4 academy players and 2 in the first round.
Surely, the Suns will trade out their first and second round picks for more points.
I highly doubt the pick from Lobb will go to GC for Sharp.If Meek is traded we’ll get a pick.
What we receive from Lobb will go to GC for Sharp.
Possibly no ND players coming in??
Half back flanker.I'm looking at Jackson in neither of the ruck or forward roles.
Where do you (and Carnthedockers) see him playing?I'm looking at Jackson in neither of the ruck or forward roles.
No JVR is not more of a need than Jackson. Treacy and Amiss are ahead of JVR. JVR offers nothing in the ruck as Lobb will be gone. Cmon Man.
Agree - North F3PP should be all that’s needed for Sharp. It would be a pick in the late 30s for a guy who was taken in the late 20s and not been able to establish himself in their B22.The North Melbourne F3 would be fair for sharp I reckon.
If we pay a second for a player they have to be seen to be B22 by the club, and on reasonably decent coin too. Jordan Clark and Aish two good recent examples.
Actually - was Aish extended at all??
Agree - North F3PP should be all that’s needed for Sharp. It would be a pick in the late 30s for a guy who was taken in the late 20s and not been able to establish himself in their B22.
And Aish signed in for 3 years a little while back.
I was thinking about this point yesterday. The fact they used pick 11 in 2020 to get sharp at 27 in 2019 was their own stupid fault. Of course Geelong were the winner again from that transaction, what’s new.Sharp was taken at 27 but GC used a future pick 11 to obtain that pick 27. The future pick 11 was part of their assistance package.
I doubt it gets done for a 3rd when he has a year to run.
True. But, they did give up 11, so they may simply wish to hope they see a return on that investment.I was thinking about this point yesterday. The fact they used pick 11 in 2020 to get sharp at 27 in 2019 was their own stupid fault. Of course Geelong were the winner again from that transaction, what’s new.
The simple fact is that Sharp was regarded by the 18 club recruiters at the 27th best player in his draft.
Just because those dumb fools at GC used pick 11 - not our problem.
Yep its annoying but he is contracted, we have to pay overs unfortunatelyI was thinking about this point yesterday. The fact they used pick 11 in 2020 to get sharp at 27 in 2019 was their own stupid fault. Of course Geelong were the winner again from that transaction, what’s new.
The simple fact is that Sharp was regarded by the 18 club recruiters at the 27th best player in his draft.
Just because those dumb fools at GC used pick 11 - not our problem.
Yep F2. Very Likely ours.Sharp was taken at 27 but GC used a future pick 11 to obtain that pick 27. The future pick 11 was part of their assistance package.
I doubt it gets done for a 3rd when he has a year to run.
I forgot the pick 11 part. How stupid of them.Sharp was taken at 27 but GC used a future pick 11 to obtain that pick 27. The future pick 11 was part of their assistance package.
I doubt it gets done for a 3rd when he has a year to run.
I was thinking about this point yesterday. The fact they used pick 11 in 2020 to get sharp at 27 in 2019 was their own stupid fault. Of course Geelong were the winner again from that transaction, what’s new.
The simple fact is that Sharp was regarded by the 18 club recruiters at the 27th best player in his draft.
Just because those dumb fools at GC used pick 11 - not our problem.
We paid 8 or whatever it was for Logue... I don't get your pointSharp was taken at 27 but GC used a future pick 11 to obtain that pick 27. The future pick 11 was part of their assistance package.
I doubt it gets done for a 3rd when he has a year to run.
Logue was clearly an athlete, ok footballer projected to become an above average footballer - hindsight- Tim English at pick 9 and more so Shai Bolton at pick 29 - if you are considering WA boys only would have fitted in perfectly …. Big year 2016 for busts and under achievers.We paid 8 or whatever it was for Logue... I don't get your point
We paid 8 or whatever it was for Logue... I don't get your point
Well there’s a few.
Sharp is contracted and only played a few years.
Logue wasn’t in contract and played 6 years.
If Henry wanted out would we accept a F2 just because? Or would we say ‘He was a top 10 pick with a year to run’
The points not overly difficult to understand.
Melbourne already have too many inside midfieldersWhere do you (and Carnthedockers) see him playing?
And by extension, do you think Melbourne didn't best utilise, or genuinely think he's capable of elite performance across multiple roles?
He’s 3x the footballer Acres is/was.Can Jackson replace Acres? What is his tank like?
He’s 3x the footballer Acres is/was.