Game Day 2022 Trade Period Match Thread

Have you installed a Rheem or felt the loving embrace of Continental Tyres safely guide your trip?

  • Having a shower in my Rheem right now

    Votes: 22 18.0%
  • No, what a stupid poll

    Votes: 13 10.7%
  • YOU DONT KNOW ME

    Votes: 22 18.0%
  • Luke Jackson

    Votes: 65 53.3%

  • Total voters
    122

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
After listening to Walls on trade radio I have formed a firm belief that Freo are shat off at Lobb and WB for doing a deal while Lobb is still under contract and are well aware they will get a first rounder for him on the trade deadline if they treat the process and everyone involved with the contempt the situation deserves.

Yeah it’s a bit like the Weller to GC situation on a much smaller scale. The Bulldogs have committed to Lobb it would seem, and will have to make trade happen with a decent pick


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yeah it’s a bit like the Weller to GC situation on a much smaller scale. The Bulldogs have committed to Lobb it would seem, and will have to make trade happen with a decent pick


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then we should expect pick #11

And we should only do that trade after Jackson is done
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Any further word on what's happening with Tippa?

I was actually quite a fan of his during his Bombers career, I loved the way he played the game, and on reading articles like the one below, he is exactly the kind of bloke you want around your club influencing your younger players ☺️☺️

 
Lobb stays and he's probably our highest goal scorer. Lobb leaves and we get a 18 year old. Giving Amiss etc another year of development is worth hanging onto Lobb if we dont get something juicy.
 
Doesn't make any sense to me unless we are worried about Darcy in the future




If Darcy is injured then Jackson rucks and Treacy does fwd/ruck

If Jackson is injured then Darcy rucks and Treacy does fwd/ruck


if both injured then sure we need Meek but surely that won't
The club loves meek. Reckon he is one of the hardest trainers, and a real club man. The kind of person you want to keep around. If lobb goes, he is imperative. If we get the right pick lobb will go, which I think will happen. It’s a shame he plays such an important position, he would have been gone a while ago.
 
The club loves meek. Reckon he is one of the hardest trainers, and a real club man. The kind of person you want to keep around. If lobb goes, he is imperative. If we get the right pick lobb will go, which I think will happen. It’s a shame he plays such an important position, he would have been gone a while ago.
Thats all well and good but realistically he can't and shouldn't get a game when we have Darcy and Jackson
 
The club loves meek. Reckon he is one of the hardest trainers, and a real club man. The kind of person you want to keep around. If lobb goes, he is imperative. If we get the right pick lobb will go, which I think will happen. It’s a shame he plays such an important position, he would have been gone a while ago.
Why? How does that benefit us? Unless the right pick is a straight first rounder then he needs to stay.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lol I don’t condone or condemn either way mate but I thought I better let you know what you were potentially getting yourself into!

I used to love getting wasted. Even flew to Amsterdam twice just to see Mecca.

These days well... it's probably once a year
 
Actually really embarrassing for the club do straight up declare that Lobb is going nowhere, then to spiel on about why we need to keep him (essentially saying look how *ed we'll be without him), only for us to let him go for a pick in the 20s.

I agree mate. The words have seemed adamant. Not your typical ‘He’s important to us, but out of respect we’ll see if something can be done there’ type comment.

They’ve been staunch in the no trade line. To backtrack and go ‘we’ll Dogs offer was substantial blah blah’ would really piss me off.

Dogs would need to literally offer us 11 or a future first, because it’s then not about his value as such but provide us the flexibility in future years due to the restraints in trading too many first rounders over 4 year periods.

I’d keep Lobb regardless. I’m big on when you say something you mean it.
 
Actually really embarrassing for the club do straight up declare that Lobb is going nowhere, then to spiel on about why we need to keep him (essentially saying look how *ed we'll be without him), only for us to let him go for a pick in the 20s.
Nothing embarrassing about it at all. It's the way we get the best possible pick for him. Wednesday night, he's either staying or we've received maximum value for him.
 
I agree mate. The words have seemed adamant. Not your typical ‘He’s important to us, but out of respect we’ll see if something can be done there’ type comment.

They’ve been staunch in the no trade line. To backtrack and go ‘we’ll Dogs offer was substantial blah blah’ would really piss me off.

Dogs would need to literally offer us 11 or a future first, because it’s then not about his value as such but provide us the flexibility in future years due to the restraints in trading too many first rounders over 4 year periods.

I’d keep Lobb regardless. I’m big on when you say something you mean it.

The club has said that you can say your house isn't for sale but everything does have a price.

I think Freo want #11
 
The club has said that you can say your house isn't for sale but everything does have a price.

I think Freo want #11

Absolutely it does, but I’m not taking 21 for a start.

I’m also not taking a pissy upgrade from 13 to 11 if that’s just to appease Melb.

Here’s the thing. Do we in anyway see ourselves as a premiership chance with Lobb? The answer has to be yes. So, for that reason alone pick 21 ain’t worth giving up that shot of a flag. Neither is pick 11 BUT the only difference is that’s just too hard to refuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top