List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's not wrong though. Lienart takes the easy option defensively and it makes it harder for team defence to work that way. His kicking is outstanding majority of the time but he still needs to be accountable. Good depth piece and we should keep him but he doesn't make our defence better structurally
One thing that was raised the other day was Battle was classed as the key defender who had the least amount of goals kicked on him, which is a pretty good stat , so if he is settled in that position we could have a real beauty down back for years to come.

Lienart is a good fit if we get any injuries , not in our best side but there if needed and giving Sharman time in defense is only helping his development.

Our backline is one area I think we are ok in , however we do need a good small defender - with Webster and Paton doing the job now I feel we could easily pick up a player like Darcy Tucker or Duggan from West Coast - interesting to see they talked to McGrath from the Bombers.
We also need to pickup a potential star CHB like Buslinger in the draft if we had a chance to grab him - rated higher than what Naughton was in his draft.
 
Miles off!
Clark and Hill are contracted.
Look what Freo just did to Lobb. They basically told him to suck it up and see out your contract. We can do the same.

If they really want those players, then cough up the draft picks!
The problem with North wanting Hill is that they don't really have the draft picks to get the Hill deal done - I would fully expect a end of first round pick with them taking his full contract but after there pick 1 pick they really have nothing.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Disappointing that players contracted are telling their managers to see if any clubs are keen.. We're fast becoming the club players want to leave & can't attract a quality player other than a delisted one..
Yeah it sucks, but there is plenty of kids that do want to play and will play their guys out. It’s getting harder and harder to play footy professionally and it will get to a point that we won’t have passengers in our team.
Until then, cash in on the ones that want out, bring in talented kids who do want to play.
 
One thing that was raised the other day was Battle was classed as the key defender who had the least amount of goals kicked on him, which is a pretty good stat , so if he is settled in that position we could have a real beauty down back for years to come.

Lienart is a good fit if we get any injuries , not in our best side but there if needed and giving Sharman time in defense is only helping his development.

Our backline is one area I think we are ok in , however we do need a good small defender - with Webster and Paton doing the job now I feel we could easily pick up a player like Darcy Tucker or Duggan from West Coast - interesting to see they talked to McGrath from the Bombers.
We also need to pickup a potential star CHB like Buslinger in the draft if we had a chance to grab him - rated higher than what Naughton was in his draft.
Not sure I'd really like to be after either of those players tbh, both wingman/half backs who are purely outside. Duggan maybe because he's a good kick (from what i've seen) but he only signed a contract last year so would probably cost bit to try and lure him. Would rather take Harvey Gallagher with the pick we get for Long, he's a hard runner who excelled when moved to the back half.

Busslinger would be my dream if all the impact midfielders are off the board, but I doubt he gets past Gold Coast.
 
Yeah it sucks, but there is plenty of kids that do want to play and will play their guys out. It’s getting harder and harder to play footy professionally and it will get to a point that we won’t have passengers in our team.
Until then, cash in on the ones that want out, bring in talented kids who do want to play.
The players who want out have not been setting the world on fire and are most probably can't handle the pressure being put on them , so good they want out and as you said reload with players with more spine.
 
One thing that was raised the other day was Battle was classed as the key defender who had the least amount of goals kicked on him, which is a pretty good stat , so if he is settled in that position we could have a real beauty down back for years to come.

Lienart is a good fit if we get any injuries , not in our best side but there if needed and giving Sharman time in defense is only helping his development.

Our backline is one area I think we are ok in , however we do need a good small defender - with Webster and Paton doing the job now I feel we could easily pick up a player like Darcy Tucker or Duggan from West Coast - interesting to see they talked to McGrath from the Bombers.
We also need to pickup a potential star CHB like Buslinger in the draft if we had a chance to grab him - rated higher than what Naughton was in his draft.
Crap stat, Battle played on the third forward, so it doesn’t actually tell the whole picture. How many goals would that 3rd forward generally average per game?

Like disposal efficiency, face up kicks 10 meters backwards is a cheap stat.
What is the disposal under pressure stat?

As far as our back 6 goes, IMO, is a break even pass. Considering the amount of ball that went in, but was quickly exposed.

IMO we need a tall 200cm athletic KPD

Back 6 certain starters -
Wilke - BP
Howard to go CHB
Coffield HB
Rotate Sincs HB
(rotate through mid with Owens or drafted mid)

If we get a KPD, that leaves 1 position for;
Battle
Paton
Webster
Connelly
Highmore
Leinart
Clark - most likely drafted
Long - most likely drafted
Sharman - should be playing forward.
 
I think they are a bit confused myself. Doubt they care about a premiership, just getting a toe in the top 8 to save face would do them. There was no premiership build happening in the last 5 years. All I can imagine is that after 2 years of fails they are panicking and buying time.


We are largely a middle age list, not much old and not much youth.
Hence why they maybe biting the bullet and are committing to try and right their wrongs now before it is too late and King and his brother are at the end of their prime ..... and we find ourselves in another middling hole in 5 years time

I think if Hill (who is 29) is keen to break contract and move then I think we would definitely consider it - it is just that we can't force the move so we need him to do the heavy lifting

Re: Clark - he has enormous potential but he is fragile and just can't seem to get his body right - also maybe the powers that be see something in Clark that believe can't be fixed ie: fitness, strength building, lack of true commitment to getting the best out of himself - right now he has some trade currency and if we believe he will never reach his true potential then let's at least make the most out of a stagnant situation

If Gresh has a middling year next year then he could also find himself on the chopping block

Billings is too far down the track now to get anything decent for

Of course if we are going to draft for a mini rebuild with the intention of building a talented young core around the Kings then we have to hit every draft pick .... we can't afford any more misses at least with our top end draft picks

Windy Nasiah and Michito has been a good start and hopefully we can find a few more gold nuggets
 
Crap stat, Battle played on the third forward, so it doesn’t actually tell the whole picture. How many goals would that 3rd forward generally average per game?

Like disposal efficiency, face up kicks 10 meters backwards is a cheap stat.
What is the disposal under pressure stat?

As far as our back 6 goes, IMO, is a break even pass. Considering the amount of ball that went in, but was quickly exposed.

IMO we need a tall 200cm athletic KPD
I don't think our backline is actually that poor, our midfield let the ball just waltz in there. It wasn't the amount of times it was down there that hurt us but how little pressure was on the kicker going inside 50.

Unfortunately 200cm athletic KPDs don't grow on trees though Lewis Hayes could be close potentially to our 2nd in the draft and wouldn't mind trading up for him (provided that we aren't overpaying drastically).
 
Crap stat, Battle played on the third forward, so it doesn’t actually tell the whole picture. How many goals would that 3rd forward generally average per game?

Like disposal efficiency, face up kicks 10 meters backwards is a cheap stat.
What is the disposal under pressure stat?

As far as our back 6 goes, IMO, is a break even pass. Considering the amount of ball that went in, but was quickly exposed.

IMO we need a tall 200cm athletic KPD

Back 6 certain starters -
Wilke - BP
Howard to go CHB
Coffield HB
Rotate Sincs HB
(rotate through mid with Owens or drafted mid)

If we get a KPD, that leaves 1 position for;
Battle
Paton
Webster
Connelly
Highmore
Leinart
Clark - most likely drafted
Long - most likely drafted
Sharman - should be playing forward.
You'd play a 7th so you'd have 2 to choose from.

Also, I'd be rotating Ross to hbf with Sincs.

I'd be really pissed if we lose Clark and Long. We seem to be just churning through players the last few years for not much improvement and I'd rather just retain the group together rather than shuffling the chairs around - at least they'd have synergy.

But, if we could get another 1st round pick to get a big bodied mid like Husthwaite and also land Busslinger that would sweeten it a little.
 
I dont think so.
Melbs will get a handsome exchange for Jackson and Freo will get Jackson. Both getting a result.

Here's my list.

Trade Winners And Losers
Winners
Richmond
Brisbane
Collingwood
North Melbourne
Gold Coast
Melbourne
Fremantle

Losers
St Kilda
Essendon


Bulldogs look like being a winner if you think short term.

Their tall backs have been suspect and no they have Liam Jones for FB.

Lobb gives them another weapon while they wait for Darcy to Develop.

That will certainly help them list wise at least for the next season or two.


Though the Dogs biggest problem is the same as ours in that each of us has a shitty gameplan, and seemingly coaches too stubborn to change it.
Losing Dunkley does not hurt them as they have an abundance of mids.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We have pretty much lost Hunter Clark to 2 years of freak injuries, trading him now makes 0 sense
 
As much as I love hunter Clark, and I know he has been horribly unlucky with injuries, if you were to compare his first 5 years in the league compared to our whipping boy billings it’s like comparing apples and oranges. Billings kicked 3 in the last quarter to get us over the line in our comeback against the doggies, he also kicked 5 goals and had 30 disposals in his 50th game. I’m not even sure if hunter has ever had 30 in a game.
He also had 25 and 3 in a 30-point loss against West Coast in his tenth game.

Billings has tragically never been able to recapture just how good he looked in his first 50 games but as I've been saying in this thread, Hunter Clark has never had a game that he tore apart like that in his first 50 games where he was the deciding factor.

It's really disappointing because his hands are unbelievably clean and he's the best ambidextrous kick in the competition. The skills are there for him to be great, but he hasn't captured it.
 
The problem with North wanting Hill is that they don't really have the draft picks to get the Hill deal done - I would fully expect a end of first round pick with them taking his full contract but after there pick 1 pick they really have nothing.

Hill’s trade value has lowered since we got him based on his age now (turns 30 next year) and that his form hasn’t been as good as it was at Freo. His ’full contract’ shouldn’t be a factor and only diminishes his trade value if we are desperate to get rid of him (a la Treloar).

Doesn’t sound like we are trying to get rid of him nor do we need to offload his salary (Hannebery, Ryder, Geary, Kent all retiring).

If Hill really wants to leave then he should negotiate a new salary with North (or any other club) based on what they feel he is worth.

If North don’t value him at his current salary then he takes a pay cut to move (or he stays).

Then Saints and North work out a fair trade deal for both parties.
 
Last edited:
GC have two picks in the thirties. At this point I think they are 31 and 37.

They want Ben Long, then honestly one of those at least is coming this way.

Hill should be worth something in the first twenty.
Clark should be worth something in the first twenty also.

I dont want to lose Long or Clark to be honest. Clark especially. If he is going anywhere we must be adequately compensated. I'd be unhappy with anything beyond the first fifteen really.

With that speculation in some miraculous way actually happened, then we would definitely have a considerable draft hand.
 
The champions that are taken outside the top 7 or 8 picks are very very rare. Look at most brownlows and awards and nearly all of them are taken in that top end of the draft.
Thats not a fact at all. In the 23 years of national drafts the Brownlow medal winners that were drafted in the top 10, only won 8 Brownlows (35%).

Brownlow medal winners taken with picks 11-58, father son and zone took 65% of Brownlow wins.

Brownlow medal winners who were drafted with picks from 20-58 won 12 times (52%).

If we want a better chance of drafting a Brownlow winner then we need to get our hands on Picks 20, 40, 43, and 58 who all have had two Brownlow winners each. Interestingly these four picks have produced as many Brownlow winners (35%) as the top 10 picks have.
 
Does he want to leave?
Interesting that neither the club or Clark's management have denied or confirmed it.. Could Clark feel a change of scenary might bring him a bit more luck..
Hill & Hannebery have/did fall short on what we gave up in relation to picks/players/salary cap..
Do we reverse our recent trend & hit the draft with an eye on a top 4-6 draft pick if we wrapped Clark with our pick 8/9
Clark has been hit hard with injury & understandably been a shadow of the player we saw in 2020..
No doubt though he's talented & a likely 200 game player..
Regarding Hill I noted the club said they hadn't discussed a trade with Hill but didn't declare he's "a contracted & required player.."
,
 
So if that’s the case Hill will stay and club will not release him
Wasn't aware the club made an official statement..
We've invested a healthy amount into Hill there's still time to reap some reward..
A more attacking style/transition from defence would see Hill's strength, which is his run & ability to hit up leading forward's be best utilised..
A big difference between Rds 1-11, than post bye Rds 13-23 & coincidentally Hilly had very good first half year..
 
Hill hasn’t been put up for trade and Hill hasn’t been told to find a new home because we don’t want his salary.

Ratten has said Hill is a required player.

That’s fact.

Clarko meeting Hill in secret
Hill meeting Simpkin & co
Hill now not telling the club his intention.

That is also fact.

So when you read between the lines as you say. What outcome did you get?
Clark & Hilly have been found at the Boundary Hotel Pokies of late...
 
Personally think it’s really unprofessional the way he’s stringing us along, if he is.
Make a decision one way or the other.
Probably not unexpected though, since he’s previously broken contracts with two other clubs. Not a good look his behalf.
In the old days some might even suggest he's a mercenary..
 
Hunter Clarke needs a massive kick up the ass. Disappointing career thus far.

Has talent, but looks slower than ever. The inability to put even on 2kg of muscle over 4 years is bloody dreadful, and quite frankly alarming.

Either he has no work ethic or bottom 1% genetics. Both outcomes not great.

Too much raisin toast
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top