Game Day 2023 Round 20 Discussion - Club Experimentation Time

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
That didn't last long .

Poms need another 150 to make this a game .
Reaction GIF
 
Anyone else have Keays and 23 “premos”playing?

My loops aren’t very helpful this weekend so thinking of chucking him straight on the bench.

The role last week wasn’t good and he got lucky
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Assuming everybody is going to VC Daicos and that's boring so I may change it before the game...

...JDG bounce back after scoring a 55?
 
Have one trade left and a complete 22 including Walsh with Cincotta as cover for the next 2-3 weeks.

Am considering grabbing Hewett for Johnson and going to 0 trades. Will be able to cover Walsh and anyone else through DPP.

Initially I wanted to hang onto my last trade in case of another LTI but starting to think Hewett would be a better investment.

Worst case scenario I get another LTI and Hewett comes in. Best outcome I have no LTI and I can loop Hewett with Mills (my weakest premo) for the rest of the year. Plus proper cover for Walsh.

Thoughts?
 
Have one trade left and a complete 22 including Walsh with Cincotta as cover for the next 2-3 weeks.

Am considering grabbing Hewett for Johnson and going to 0 trades. Will be able to cover Walsh and anyone else through DPP.

Initially I wanted to hang onto my last trade in case of another LTI but starting to think Hewett would be a better investment.

Worst case scenario I get another LTI and Hewett comes in. Best outcome I have no LTI and I can loop Hewett with Mills (my weakest premo) for the rest of the year. Plus proper cover for Walsh.

Thoughts?

I say go for it

My only concern might be with Hewett's output dropping as Carlton are getting players back, but I guess you'd have a better idea of his role than me
 
I say go for it

My only concern might be with Hewett's output dropping as Carlton are getting players back, but I guess you'd have a better idea of his role than me

Thanks. Yeah he is should be safe. Pretty much all year Carlton have played Cripps, Cerra, Walsh and one of Kennedy or Hewett as our onballers. Kennedy injured for the rest of the year means Hewetts spot is secured
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Have one trade left and a complete 22 including Walsh with Cincotta as cover for the next 2-3 weeks.

Am considering grabbing Hewett for Johnson and going to 0 trades. Will be able to cover Walsh and anyone else through DPP.

Initially I wanted to hang onto my last trade in case of another LTI but starting to think Hewett would be a better investment.

Worst case scenario I get another LTI and Hewett comes in. Best outcome I have no LTI and I can loop Hewett with Mills (my weakest premo) for the rest of the year. Plus proper cover for Walsh.

Thoughts?
I think that’s the idea at this stage, as long as you have plenty of loops then a trade will only cover 1 injury so bringing on an extra best 22 is basically the same.

Its only a risk if you subsequently lose a Bont-type uber as you can pick up a far better replacement than Hewett for the cash.
 
Moneyball is suggesting Stewart (got 170 last year) to Sicily

Will GEEL play Stewart in the midfield again ?
Is that necessarily bad for Stewart's scoring though?
Especially this week, when the ball will hardly go to the Cats defensive line
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #72
Is that necessarily bad for Stewart's scoring though?
Especially this week, when the ball will hardly go to the Cats defensive line
Don't know, doesn't seem easy choices this week, for (VC) & (C) ......my vibe is not vibrating ....might be a flat battery though
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #75
Lots of rumours flying around that Cripps will be a late out
Really ....what's the point

The days of shock inclusions / withdrawls is well & truly over ......spies everywhere
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top