List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Edit: will update if ppl happy for this to sticky

Ok starting the hit list of names mentioned in any rumour as linked to us for 2023 trade period.
  • Mac Andrew
  • Hunter Clark
  • Zac Fisher
  • Sam Flanders
  • Mitch Georgiades
  • Liam Henry
  • Dougal Howard
  • Lewis Melican
  • Jack Silvagni
  • Dylan Stephens
  • Adam Tomlinson
 
Last edited:
I'm absolutely on board with this call. The guy was 3rd in the ruck queue at GWS, anyone know his contract status? His last month has been spectacular.
Offer Briggs whatever he wants.

He’s a more mobile Sean Darcy, but without the injury issues.
End of 2024:

 

Log in to remove this ad.

If McKay doesn’t leave I’d be keen on Mason Redman from the bombers.
 
You can be guaranteed that any deal between GWS and Eagles for number 1 pick will involve North's pick 2.

Eagles will not want to give up pick one for then getting the 5th or 6th best players in the draft.

I can see us giving up pick 2 and in return a mega deal between several clubs will see us getting two picks in the 5-10 range, while eagles will get pick 2 another top 10 pick and GWS next year's first.

Bookmark it.

Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk
 
You can be guaranteed that any deal between GWS and Eagles for number 1 pick will involve North's pick 2.

Eagles will not want to give up pick one for then getting the 5th or 6th best players in the draft.

I can see us giving up pick 2 and in return a mega deal between several clubs will see us getting two picks in the 5-10 range, while eagles will get pick 2 another top 10 pick and GWS next year's first.

Bookmark it.

Sent from my CPH2197 using Tapatalk
this is an impossible scenario because GWS only have 2 top 10 picks so either one of us or West Coast would receive the other?
We have 2 & 17, West Coast have 1, GWS has 5 & 7. Unless we trade 2 & 17 for 5 & 7 and then GWS send 2,17 & future 1st for 1, I’d take it if I were West Coast and Reid says he wouldn’t stay, otherwise not sure they take that.
 
Why would WA native Logue want to be traded to us?

Why would SA native CCJ want to be traded to us?
Because they weren’t getting games in the position they wanted.

In the leadership group at Essendon, playing week in week out in a favourable role. Happy to be wrong but there’s no money we would offer him that Essendon wouldn’t match. They’re in the top 8, we’re 2nd last. Redman is a 0% chance.

As for a Bergman, we would only be a chance due to the money we can give him and the go-home factor, but why choose us over better performing vic clubs that can offer the same money? I’d give that a generous 25% chance.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Because they weren’t getting games in the position they wanted.

In the leadership group at Essendon, playing week in week out in a favourable role. Happy to be wrong but there’s no money we would offer him that Essendon wouldn’t match. They’re in the top 8, we’re 2nd last. Redman is a 0% chance.

As for a Bergman, we would only be a chance due to the money we can give him and the go-home factor, but why choose us over better performing vic clubs that can offer the same money? I’d give that a generous 25% chance.

Say you get somewhere between five to eight years in your dream job.

You get to choose which boss you have over that time.

Which one is it?


c714f12c63be2af86307845241b09982


Or


PC190822DT332684447.jpg
 
this is an impossible scenario because GWS only have 2 top 10 picks so either one of us or West Coast would receive the other?
We have 2 & 17, West Coast have 1, GWS has 5 & 7. Unless we trade 2 & 17 for 5 & 7 and then GWS send 2,17 & future 1st for 1, I’d take it if I were West Coast and Reid says he wouldn’t stay, otherwise not sure they take that.
if this trade were to happen id be all for it. with all of gold coasts academy players our 17 would go out past 20 anyways. having 5 and 7 could also give us the opportunity to bid on gold coasts players aswell.
 
if this trade were to happen id be all for it. with all of gold coasts academy players our 17 would go out past 20 anyways. having 5 and 7 could also give us the opportunity to bid on gold coasts players aswell.
Yeah it makes some sense for us but I was more commenting like both us and West Coast don’t leave that deal with two top 10 picks this year because it’s impossible unless Giants acquire another one, or if a fourth team is involved, but that’s just too convoluted at that point.

I really think we need Watson more than anything so I’m in the camp of keeping pick 2. But if we were to say get pick 3 for McKay I’d do 3 & 17 for 5 & 7 in a heartbeat.
 
Say you get somewhere between five to eight years in your dream job.

You get to choose which boss you have over that time.

Which one is it?


c714f12c63be2af86307845241b09982


Or


PC190822DT332684447.jpg
Doubt that’s really a factor for players who are already with a team with stability in their coaching ranks and performing well. Might start to become a factor a few years down the line when we’re successful. Didn’t really help us last year - I believe Logue & Tucker more or less would have come either way.

Players will come to us for a combination of money or to play games / a specific role they want to play and to come back to Melbourne (which we are competing with 9 other clubs).
 
Yeah it makes some sense for us but I was more commenting like both us and West Coast don’t leave that deal with two top 10 picks this year because it’s impossible unless Giants acquire another one, or if a fourth team is involved, but that’s just too convoluted at that point.

I really think we need Watson more than anything so I’m in the camp of keeping pick 2. But if we were to say get pick 3 for McKay I’d do 3 & 17 for 5 & 7 in a heartbeat.
If we can get pick 3 compo for mckay ill drive him to the aiport myself. following this deal going into the draft with 2 5 and 7 we'd be laughing. Watson caddy and a kpd we win!
 
Yeah it makes some sense for us but I was more commenting like both us and West Coast don’t leave that deal with two top 10 picks this year because it’s impossible unless Giants acquire another one, or if a fourth team is involved, but that’s just too convoluted at that point.

I really think we need Watson more than anything so I’m in the camp of keeping pick 2. But if we were to say get pick 3 for McKay I’d do 3 & 17 for 5 & 7 in a heartbeat.

I honestly don't think we'll take a 5 5' midget with pick 2. But a long way to go until we need to make a decision.
He's an inch taller than Dusty Hoffman, who for obvious reasons never followed the other Dusty to the Tigers. And I's suggest height was the issue.
Could be wrong though.
 
Doubt that’s really a factor for players who are already with a team with stability in their coaching ranks and performing well. Might start to become a factor a few years down the line when we’re successful. Didn’t really help us last year - I believe Logue & Tucker more or less would have come either way.

Players will come to us for a combination of money or to play games / a specific role they want to play and to come back to Melbourne (which we are competing with 9 other clubs).
I take your point mate, and I mostly agree, I'm just suggesting there can be other contributing factors too.

Lobb and Dunkley are two examples of trades that didn't happen for the reasons of hometown returns or best 22 standing. There could've been a financial component, but I haven't read anything that suggests their new teams offered lots more than they were already getting. Sometimes there just seems to be other dimensions at play.
 
I take your point mate, and I mostly agree, I'm just suggesting there can be other contributing factors too.

Lobb and Dunkley are two examples of trades that didn't happen for the reasons of hometown returns or best 22 standing. There could've been a financial component, but I haven't read anything that suggests their new teams offered lots more than they were already getting. Sometimes there just seems to be other dimensions at play.
Dunkley has a Qld girlfriend/fiancée and want's to settle there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top