Ultimate Glory 2023 Trade speculation and Shinbeggars discussion

[Xtreme]

I don't know how they do it but Essendon won trade week yet again!!!

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Massimo for 61 and a F4.

Lol, why would we do that? Terrible.

 

[VandoHawk]

It's a weird set of events where I think pick 61 and a future fourth is overpaying lol

 

[naysayer]

Ryan was a late MSD pick that played 3 games, one of which he had one touch before being subbed out. He had a two game sample size worthy of comment.

He would also be vying for a spot with Chol, DGB and Ramsden this season. Losing him is hardly the end of the world.

It's not the end of the world. It's just giving up a player who had potential to take us forward, in order to get back a player who left the club. One of the worst deals I've ever seen the HFC do. I'll never understand it. We should have walked away.

 

[sohsam]

Ins
Ginnivan
Chol
Gunston
Massimo
Pick 44
Pick 47
Pick 49
Pick 61
Pick 62
Pick 63
Collingwood 2024 Second
Collingwood 2024 Fourth

Outs
Brockman
Koschitzke
Ryan
Pick 33
Pick 54
2024 Second
2024 Third
2024 Fourth

I think the one that hurts is giving up our second rounder for next year which will be quite high for Chol, as well as Chol's 5 year contract. There is certainly some risk there in GC not playing this year, 3rd club for him. Are we in a rebuilding or premiership phase. I am alittle confused by that selection. Then again draft picks are just that, look at DGB with such high pick. Chol is similar age to mitch lewis, perhaps thinking to be a double throng attack.

 

[I got the outside word]

Why did we give anything up for Mass? What the ****? Or why is the future 4th attached? Jesus.

 

[bigconornash]

D'Ambrosio- pick 61 and F4

 

[Mr Meeseeks]

We lost a 25 year old who has played 3 games and a forward that nobody wanted.

We got a fwd who is better than both of them in Chol and a favourite son back.

Losing Brocky stung but Ginni is 20 with 50 + goals to his name, he will be better anyway.

Plus Massimo for bugger all

The melt downs in this thread are pretty pathetic tbh.

 

[extractasam]

Would have preferred to take Mass with a late pick. Once delisted, he'll be a perpetual delisted free agent.

Trade was done for him

 

[CHUBBSS]

Ambrossio is definitely a Sam player, he would of pushed hard for him will be interesting how he plays him

 

[Sturty]

Massimo for 61 and a F4.

Lol, why would we do that? Terrible.

This is flipping dumb
Should of got him for nothing

 

[VandoHawk]

We have weakened our draft hand in 2024 a bit. We now only have our first (which to be fair is the important one) and Collingwood's future second.

No longer have a future third or fourth.

 

[Dewnior]

So GCS fine to part with Hollands for a future 3rd but Chol no we * Hawthorn. Its an interesting approach by GCS to other clubs compared to us. The JOM trade still burns. Its the only explanation

You are kidding right? GC/AFL reamed us on that trade.

It's a bit fishy that it's only us that GC choose to play hardball with don't you think?

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Why did we give anything up for Mass? What the *?

Soft touch Hawks.

I suppose pick 61 may be useless for us, but losing a F4 is frustrating.

 

[RIOLINWITPUNCHS]

We really are the nice guys aren't we.

Clubs must just try and push there players to us knowing we will pay overs.

 

[KermitJagger]

How did we have all the leverage in the world for D'Ambrosio and still end up giving up more than we initially wanted to? Must have something to do with list spots, but doesn't explain the future pick being involved at all.

 

[Suntory Boss Coffee]

So pick 61 and future pick ~58 for Massimo

As much as I hate Essendon, it is good to keep goodwill. Remember that they asked for a second lol

 

[WWSD]

Can’t wait to see Chol light up the MCG.

:

 

[VandoHawk]

How did we have all the leverage in the world for D'Ambrosio and still end up giving up more than we initially wanted to? Must have something to do with list spots, but doesn't explain the future pick being involved at all.

Purely just to make sure Massimo doesn't have to jump through loopholes.
F4 would have been enough in my books though.

 

[Slaatybaadfaast]

Word around that traps is that Dildo's been given a mammoth dildo by his employers as a parting gift

 

[Iceman!]

How did we have all the leverage in the world for D'Ambrosio and still end up giving up more than we initially wanted to? Must have something to do with list spots, but doesn't explain the future pick being involved at all.

Yeah it isn't worth melting over a 4th round pick but why?

Just frustrating when we didn't have to do it.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Word around that traps is that Dildo's been given a mammoth dildo by his employers as a parting gift

He is the Dildo. Sounds like Dildception

 

[HeHateMe]

So pretty much this was the outcome, happy with that tbh

IN: Ginnivan, Chol, Gunston, 1335 Points, F2nd(Coll), F4th(Coll)
Out: Brockman, Kosi, Ryan, 783 Points, F2nd, F3rd, F4th

 

[Ashman23]

FFS, now I'm p'd off.

Future 4th included with pick 61.....

 

[The Spirit of Cricket]

How did we have all the leverage in the world for D'Ambrosio and still end up giving up more than we initially wanted to? Must have something to do with list spots, but doesn't explain the future pick being involved at all.

guess we just value the branding of being pleasant to deal with. the lack of F4 means we wont be able to pick up Scully or Patton now though