Clearly not the point you silly sausageI'd still back him to become a weapon again over Shiel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clearly not the point you silly sausageI'd still back him to become a weapon again over Shiel.
reminds me of the enforcerThats 5!!
There is no guarantee we get another first round next year.You are swapping Gresham for a pick. We are paying Essendon to push us into a higher band. No really good FRDP mids in this draft apart from McKercher and maybe Sanders. Then some more speculative ones like George Stephens and some of the more outside types like Demattia and Wilson.
I'd say take best available and try to wait until next year for chasing another while topping up with Dow and Henry types.
Gringo whenever something leaks about SoS’s intentions to improveGringo, i love you, but stop being a miserable campaigner lol
The other could be Haynes…similar scenario!And for the record…
I’m not saying I knew about the proposal the HSun has written about.
Just the below, which is some of what I’ve shared.
- we have wanted multiple picks in this first round (2-3)
- Happy to let Gresham and Howard go to facilitate
- found out we liked Shiel and he was gettable at the start of the week
- there could be another contracted player we are keen on, but I don’t know if that was referring to shiel or another.
- Membrey Paton Clark Billings Coffield are the other ones I mentioned are all gettable weeks ago.
So abit to play out.
Well if we cleared all these players I guess we would have the cap room…The other could be Haynes…similar scenario!
Clearly not the point you silly sausage
So we take on Shiel and his salary.Pick 13 along with our pick 12.
Then we potentially work our way up into the top 10.
Gringo whenever something leaks about SoS’s intentions to improve
So we take on Shiel and his salary.
Bombers take Gresh on a large enough salary to get us first round compo ie #13.
Sounds a bit like tampering…would the AFL allow it?
After the Geelong / Bowes thing they should.
At least we can see a little creativity from our list management team - which is encouraging.
Check this guy out
So have 12 and 13 plus shiel with the gresh deal
Then Howard ends up going and somehow jag that as a first
That's 3 firsts
Patton and coff to go and we score maybe a late second and a third or two thirds (prob)
Then Clark says fuxk this im out and gets us a late first as well
That's 4 firsts
And then Billings to North for pick 2
Am I doing it right?
Thats 5!!
He is on a 1 year dealI was hoping that we were beyond dumb moves for the sake of them. Sos wants to go big and so going to s**t up the place in his fist trade period.
It must be realized the only reason Gresham was not dropped this year because we had no one to replace him - next year is going to be a different story.There is no guarantee we get another first round next year.
Next year is also potentially a huge Free agent pool.
This gets more first round talent in the door that we can develop and join our core and sets us up to make a move at that free agent crop WHILST not impacting us onfield for losing Gresham
Gringo, i love you, but stop being a miserable campaigner lol
He is on a 1 year deal
We get pick 13 and Gresh wants to go.
What exactly is wrong here for you?
Could just take Mckercher at 5So another year wasted advertising hope some half forward flanker in a week.draft can run through the mids in maybe 3 years.
We need to go all for pick 4 and get Sanders or Duursma.
I am.sick.of the constant midfield nothingness of our table standings.
We need to take risks and we get a top quality mid. What is wrong with that? And we still have depth in Sheil.
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Gresham is the one wanting to leave.We are taking on Shiel and losing players to fit him. Not for a pick but a slight upgrade on Gresham compo. Not sure we are getting anything much out of it but another waste of a spot. If no-one is offering enough for Gresham we should keep him IMO.
Yep, If the two are on the board, most clubs will be taking the KerchCould just take Mckercher at 5