Yeah that's fine.I’d back our culture in to keep any of them tbh. It’s the one thing we seem to have got right.
I'm just interested if any are considered to be in that category.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah that's fine.I’d back our culture in to keep any of them tbh. It’s the one thing we seem to have got right.
Yeah that's fine.
I'm just interested if any are considered to be in that category. to be
I've seen a few WC posters say Josh Smillie and Murphy Reid aren't in contention for their pick, for those reasons (possibly amongst others). Time will tell.Any of those guys expected to go early and around our pick known to be a go home possible risk?
I cant see the point of Langford or Smillie in our list and Reid doesnt do it for me.I've seen a few WC posters say Josh Smillie and Murphy Reid aren't in contention for their pick, for those reasons (possibly amongst others). Time will tell.
Regardless, I'd rather Draper, or any of FOS/Lalor/Jagga at our pick before those two. Langford's the one I haven't watched much of so hard to gauge where I'd like him.
I have it as preferenceI cant see the point of Langford or Smillie in our list and Reid doesnt do it for me.
Def the big 4 Lalor Draper Jagga FOS great options for me in that order (i keep flip flopping draper and Jagga in preferences 2 and 3)
It really is a great top 7 or so you’re guaranteed a decent mid
Smith
O'Sullivan
Langford
Draper
Reid
Smillie
Ashcroft (doesn’t really count )
The idea someone floated about splitting 4 I would seriously consider it if Richmond get 6 as part of Rioli deal
4 and F1 for 6 and F1
Gets us Smillie and likely Dyson Sharp
Could build a real Geelong 06-11 like midfield of beasts and speed
FWIW I hope that we keep 4 and take O’Sullivan
He was touted as pick 1 early on from memory ?What is the knock on Smillie...besides the fact that with that height, we'd play him as a KPD for the first half of the year in the SANFL so he could learn how to defend
Tigers would if keen on a particular playerThats all great but if the top 6 are equally weighted why would any club do that to move 2 places.
His size and physical traits suggest a Cripps-style inside mid, but he plays as a first receiver type. So it's a bit of a mismatch: his contested numbers are slightly illusory at underage level because he's bigger than 99% of his direct opponents (which has arguably caused those skills to atrophy) but he's probably not fast enough to be a purely outside player. Apparently there's also a knock on his overhead marking, but I've not seen enough to judge. A club will definitely take the risk given his upside, but I don't want it to be us.What is the knock on Smillie...besides the fact that with that height, we'd play him as a KPD for the first half of the year in the SANFL so he could learn how to defend
Just like to point out no Crow in AFL's AA squad of 44. No Crow in Robbo's top 50 players for 2024.
Crow's team total for Brownlow votes was 15th.
Shows the extreme lack of talent at the club.
Criminally poor drafting and lack of aggression at the trade table has successfully relegated the Crows to non-final appearances for seven years.
It basically needed an upheaval by supporters to get the club off it's backside and do something, still not enough delistings, fifteenth reflects this. Club not nasty enough, commentators are unanimous on this aspect of the Club.
There's no "extreme lack of talent".Just like to point out no Crow in AFL's AA squad of 44. No Crow in Robbo's top 50 players for 2024.
Crow's team total for Brownlow votes was 15th.
Shows the extreme lack of talent at the club.
Criminally poor drafting and lack of aggression at the trade table has successfully relegated the Crows to non-final appearances for seven years.
It basically needed an upheaval by supporters to get the club off it's backside and do something, still not enough delistings, fifteenth reflects this. Club not nasty enough, commentators are unanimous on this aspect of the Club.
Plenty of other gun small forwardsVery disappointed that NGA rule for matching came in this year
Would’ve loved to have a dip at Malakai Champion
Yep agree , I think north are after LangfordWith the chat of North looking to trade down 2-3 spots, I get the sense Langford might be their guy.
Langford has been consistently ranked very high in Twomey's draft power rankings - not a Phantom Draft, I know, but gives the impression that interest at clubland is very strong. I think he was #2 most recently.
Would complement the mix of Sheezel / LDU / Wardlaw nicely.
Knock is his pure midfield craft outside of his size , his kick , he doesn’t run and explode out of stoppage like a Lalor . Not as expansive outside as a Langford . Also low mark numbers for a 193-194cm midfielderWhat is the knock on Smillie...besides the fact that with that height, we'd play him as a KPD for the first half of the year in the SANFL so he could learn how to defend
It really is a great top 7 or so you’re guaranteed a decent mid
Smith
O'Sullivan
Langford
Draper
Reid
Smillie
Ashcroft (doesn’t really count )
The idea someone floated about splitting 4 I would seriously consider it if Richmond get 6 as part of Rioli deal
4 and F1 for 6 and F1
Gets us Smillie and likely Dyson Sharp
Could build a real Geelong 06-11 like midfield of beasts and speed
FWIW I hope that we keep 4 and take O’Sullivan
I’ll be surprised if Richmond don’t finish bottom next yearHow exactly do we get Dyson Sharp (based on he's still flavour of the month) in November 2025, you're putting a lot of weight on Richmond finishing bottom next year.?
Only way any club can be sure of getting their desired player is to finish bottom I would of thought unless you're suggesting we pay big big overs and basically give away all out top draft capital in 2025 and 2026.
Didn't work when we made ridiculous offers to get JHF so why wouldit work with Dyson Sharp if he's similarly rated by clubs?
Or, even rapt! Perhaps you meant Christmas presents?Yep agree , I think north are after Langford
And if they could get Langford and Tauru for pick 2 they’d be wrapped
I think it’s 80% chance Richmond finish bottom 2How exactly do we get Dyson Sharp (based on he's still flavour of the month) in November 2025, you're putting a lot of weight on Richmond finishing bottom next year.?
Only way any club can be sure of getting their desired player is to finish bottom I would of thought unless you're suggesting we pay big big overs and basically give away all out top draft capital in 2025 and 2026.
Didn't work when we made ridiculous offers to get JHF so why wouldit work with Dyson Sharp if he's similarly rated by clubs?
They may have some one else's future 1st by that time, it probably wouldn't be their own on the trade table.I’ll be surprised if Richmond don’t finish bottom next year
For that reason th were unlikely to trade out their future 1st
im happy with any of the 4 so we cant loseI have it as preference
FOS
Lalor
Draper
Jagga