Luckily Houston didn't chose North as they were stupid enough to offer pick 2 for him.They'd love him but knew they were never a chance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Luckily Houston didn't chose North as they were stupid enough to offer pick 2 for him.They'd love him but knew they were never a chance
Ideally, so long as don't need to pay a massive premium.Clubs position themselves in the draft so the best available player at their pick is also the player type they need
Yeh it seemed very weird. I think he's just misspoken a bitThat's certainly how it's worded on the AFC.com.au article:
That's certainly not how I understood the state of play. Unless he's literally referring to a rookie upgrade as "using a pick".
Surely thats what we are doing, are we all missing something ??That's certainly how it's worded on the AFC.com.au article:
That's certainly not how I understood the state of play. Unless he's literally referring to a rookie upgrade as "using a pick".
Would need a long term injury i suspect.Are we able to draft a player in the upcoming mid season draft? Or are we still out of list spots? Surely there should be some gems missing out this draft?
Or an early retirement.....Would need a long term injury i suspect.
One of the benefits of Nicks lacking a hard edge is he won't interfere.Hopefully Nicks doesn't interfere with the list manager/recruiting team like Don Pyke did on that occasion.....WCE not all enarmored with Pyke again sticking his beak in and trading out their pick 3 this year either.
Good.If it means anything, Port Adelaide think you are recruiting Draper.
Reckon Nicks would absolutely love DraperHopefully Nicks doesn't interfere with the list manager/recruiting team like Don Pyke did on that occasion.....WCE not all enarmored with Pyke again sticking his beak in and trading out their pick 3 this year either.
I AM BEGGING, PLEASE DRAPER!!!
Would need a long term injury i suspect.
I was replying to a question on the MSD.I don't think LTIs have any bearing on the national draft. They're only relevant for the MSD.
Don’t reckon Cripps and Bont would have had near as many running bounces in their 18th year taking the game on and forward with penetration
There’s burst speed then there’s transition running
Langford can be an elite transition runner
Yep agree ! All our options are very good and being something different to each otherI see Langford as a Will Day clone. He will be a gun from day 1.
More than happy with any of the top 5 mids for mine. They all bring something different. Drapers link breaking ability is second to none, he shone as an underager in a strong year - and then coming back from injury excelled at SANFL level
Smith carved up the VFL in his few games and Lalor might be better than all of them.
It should be a good night for us regardless
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Is it Wednesday yet...
Agree. I think our team are sitting there silently praying he falls to us - in that top end, SA born and bred and a crows supporter. Ticks all the boxes imoIf it’s up to us it will be Draper surely.
Equally rated SA kid with qualities we need.
People are over thinking it.
Mate, don’t do it. Don’t embarrass yourself. Reidy would no doubt just laugh off any idiot supporter contacting him with such crapI've just emailed Reid and suggested we do that trade so we can pick up a full back, a centre half back and a back flanker.
I also included some stock tips - in case he wanted to invest.
Ok sounds good in theory. And when Langford and Draper go 4 and 5 respectively and Tauru is left over what’s the plan?The move here that Ogilvie is referring to is probably a trade with Richmond to get them above Melbourne.
If we're up at 4 and Draper, Langford and Tauru are still on the board which is looking highly likely we can probably move down to 6 and still take Draper.
4 RICH Langford
5 MELB Tauru
6 ADL Draper
I reckon they'd give up something fairly decent to get Richmond supporting Langford to their club.
Obviously, as I pointed out before. It's clear what he actually meant.Yeh it seemed very weird. I think he's just misspoken a bit
Nah, sounds bad in theory!Ok sounds good in theory. And when Langford and Draper go 4 and 5 respectively and Tauru is left over what’s the plan?