Ford Fairlane
Moderator
- Feb 21, 2002
- 82,792
- 204,528
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont think this is true. I think Port were into Reid over Allan. A lot of work went into Reid the past week which is also why I thought we were genuinely taking him until this morning.West Coast probably knew we werent after Bo Allen. For Allen to slide the way he did im guessing most clubs saw him as a flight risk? He was predicted as high as 6 and rumoured not to get past richmond at 12 if he got there.
Whitlock should be because no one will want him until our pick so we can take him. Shanahan will be gone at the first pick I assume, expect Essendon to jump in. They might give Melbourne's future first. Would be shocked if Shanahan got to our pick. He's slid far enough already and he was, in my opinion which means stuff all I know, the best tall in this draft.what are the chances that Shanahan/Whitlock are available at pick 33.
Are we just going to ignore an AA key defender from WA? Mraz barely played games, Dennis and Barratt then Mraz for meApart from Mraz, none of the main tall defender targets are left
How are midfielders not a need? Aside from our best 3, our depth is very averageThese guys are more in the "worth a shot" basket than a "desperate want or need" basket.
yeah i agre,Whitlock should be because no one will want him until our pick so we can take him. Shanahan will be gone at the first pick I assume, expect Essendon to jump in. They might give Melbourne's future first. Would be shocked if Shanahan got to our pick. He's slid far enough already and he was, in my opinion which means stuff all I know, the best tall in this draft.
Mraz more of a genuine kpp height. Injury history and kicking skills are a worry for me, but would be happy to take him. I wouldn’t mind barrat or Dennis but they are a bit shorter.Are we just going to ignore an AA key defender from WA? Mraz barely played games, Dennis and Barratt then Mraz for me
My dislike for Whitlock's style of play is well documented here so I would obviously say no haha.yeah i agre,
Do we just take J.Whitlock with 33 if available?
There's two things I significantly grade prospects down on, injuries and kicking. Hence why Mraz isn't in my calculations. Not saying he won't be good, but the risk/reward isn't within my rangeMraz more of a genuine kpp height. Injury history and kicking skills are a worry for me, but would be happy to take him. I wouldn’t mind barrat or Dennis but they are a bit shorter.
I feel like one of these is a need though.
Not surprised that Whitlock slid at all and there's quite a clear reason for it. Still trying to figure out what the flaw with Shanahan his, could be that he didnt interview well and maybe clubs are a bit put off by his ground ball work. If Shanahan isn't at our next pick, I would genuinely just take Angus Clarke and then take West at the next pick and call it a night. If Barrett gets through then we still have 94 which will be in the 60s so here I'd take Hargrave. If there's a bid on Barrett just match it. Another small forward wont hurt. We can be like Chelsea with their goalkeepers.
Yeah this is the 2nd best scenario for me.Yup 100% agree with you here.
Angus Clarke pick 33 followed by Charlie West pick 38 than wait for a bid match on Benny which is unlikely to happen now with our pick 94 which will come in around the 60s.
If no bid than Phoenix Hargrave with our last pick which would be a steal and Barrett moves to the Cat B spot.
Rookie spot Jay Polkinghorne if we are lucky.
I'd be happy to do it without 44 and then just select at the end of the draft. I feel like there is going to be some decent quality still on the table then anyway (maybe even who we would pick with 44 anyway).We absolutely should be trying to trade up here to get Shanahan or Whitlock. Problem is, there will be a number of teams trying the same. Essendon are going to throw everything at Richmond to get that pick for Shanahan.
Our only real option is West Coast with 33 and 38 for 30 and 44. Nothing else is really possible
This Shanahan business is giving me Reece McKenzie vibes. Bigfooty loved him, had him top 10.
Then he slips to the Tigers in the 70s, and doesn't last two years in the system.
Drew 5+ years left at a B level AFL midHow are midfielders not a need? Aside from our best 3, our depth is very average
This Shanahan business is giving me Reece McKenzie vibes. Bigfooty loved him, had him top 10.
Then he slips to the Tigers in the 70s, and doesn't last two years in the system.
Yeah I'm doing any deal only for Shanahan or hold firmWe absolutely should be trying to trade up here to get Shanahan or Whitlock. Problem is, there will be a number of teams trying the same. Essendon are going to throw everything at Richmond to get that pick for Shanahan.
Our only real option is West Coast with 33 and 38 for 30 and 44. Nothing else is really possible
What you've shown there is precisely my issue. We have 3 A+ midfielders and hen drop do a B as our next best option. That is exactly the issue I'm talking about. The midfield is far too important a position for our back ups to be that much lower in grading to our best.Drew 5+ years left at a B level AFL mid
Rozee 7+ years left at a A+ AFL mid
Butters 7+ A+
JHF 9 + A+
Mead 7+ B (he's only 23)
J.Burgoyne, Sinn, Lorenz -all 10 years on the outside
Sinn, Jones, Bergman, Berry - a good case can be made for potential to play inside in the future at a high level
Barrett- now certain to be a Port player unless a bid comes in the next 11- an outside chance of being an AFL midfielder
Given Jase Burgoyne's DNA, a chance to become an inside mid of high quality. I saw his dad at 21 and his uncle at 20 and had no idea they would become key premiership winning inside mids at that time.
I have liked what I've seen from Jackson too but his progress has been too slow due to injury.
And I haven't even mentioned McEntee and Atkins yet
SPP (inside), Richards, Farrell. DBJ was recruited as a tagger and now that he is no longer a forward will be the ultimate utility.
Get a feeling Nicholls is off to HawksIf i was a betting man I reckon we’ll pick Clarke and Nicholls