- Oct 10, 2012
- 6,746
- 12,851
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
The only thing here is the clubs will see things differently from general fans who haven’t at he’s consistently for multiple years and don’t interview. Hence why Langford may go at 1 or might go at 7 and GWS’s recruiting boss said he’d probably have players generally considered in the 10-15 range within their top 5.My read so far would be the following:
Tier 1; O’Sullivan, Smith, Draper, Ashcroft
Tier 2; Langford, Lalor, Reid, Trainor, Smilie
Tier 3; Armstrong, Allen, Travalgia, Hotton, Kako, Lindsay, Berry, Hynes,
Tier 4; J. Whitlock, M. Whitlock, Moraes, Gross etc out to 30
You’ve said yourself you have doubts about even Lalor translating, Reid and Langford both pretty slow for the blue chip mid we’re after. Trainor not for us really, Smilie’s energy/competitiveness looks a little worrying.
Although I wouldn’t be upset with any of these guys (if they slip through), you have to say O’Sullivan looks the best of them with the most translatable traits, Smith’s game is proven at all levels/conditions, Draper the prototype mid we’re looking for with burst pace and link running.
Year on year proves there’s unexpected busts outside the top 5. You said it yourself.. IF we selected the right guys at 7,8. And you’ve expressed doubts about dalrymple’s first round drafting.
There’s a gap as there is every year and like every year, we should do what we can to get into the top 3.
There could be a bunch of surprises.