Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should be a politician.
A lot of words come out. You ramble on.
A lot of it does not make sense. A lot of what you say has at least 2 meanings.
And then you digress.
Summary.
Not much sense.
What would Tom green earn?Not really $1.1 is about right for Errol who is by far and away our best player. You’d expect Logan is say 750k which is about par for a key tall with incentives
A fit Gus Sheldrick.Name the player that we can get to improve our list whilst in the window. Just name the player.
Hehe. Now we are talking sense.A fit Gus Sheldrick.
What would Tom green earn?
Probably similar be close to their best so 1.1 to 1.3, we have to realise million dollar contracts are more common and they have gone up massively
Hayward can’t kick round the corner.Hayward is being singled out for kicking around the corner when the better option would be to go back and kick truly.
If you watch enough games each weekend you will find Hayward is not alone. It’s a curse on the game.
Hayward can’t kick round the corner.
The shank was soooooo depressingly predictable the moment he decided to kick round the corner.
He’s in McKay territory when it comes to the yips.
Sorry I wasn't awareProbably similar be close to their best so 1.1 to 1.3, we have to realise million dollar contracts are more common and they have gone up massively
Go back the week earlier and he kicked two in the first against the Bombers.Hayward can’t kick round the corner.
The shank was soooooo depressingly predictable the moment he decided to kick round the corner.
He’s in McKay territory when it comes to the yips.
AFL goal of the week , or ours ?He had goal of the week around the corner a week earlier
AFL goal of the week , or ours ?
The balance that those guys contribute to is pretty special. I'll be happy to see all of them play out their careers as Swans. Of course it will be terrific for them to improve but anyone we get to replace them would only improve us very marginally at best.I don't want Hayward to go, nor Florent. I don't want to lose anyone in that 100+ game bracket, lest we end up back on the youth hamster wheel. But they were never going to be as much of a priority as the other three. Once that trio are signed hopefully we can work something reasonable out for Florent & Hayward.
On average it’s only 1, million dollar + player per team*You have a spreadsheet
Of course . Like Rohan i always wanted him to do more , but just goes missing and was in his new role . Fox showed how to kick them straightOurs
Hayward can’t kick round the corner.
The shank was soooooo depressingly predictable the moment he decided to kick round the corner.
He’s in McKay territory when it comes to the yips.
That's what this threads about sadlyOn average it’s only 1, million dollar + player per team*
*Except the Swans where we’ll have a dozen players on a million based on the experts analysis in this thread
Of course . Like Rohan i always wanted him to do more , but just goes missing and was in his new role . Fox showed how to kick them straight
On average it’s only 1, million dollar + player per team*
*Except the Swans where we’ll have a dozen players on a million based on the experts analysis in this thread
Name the player you want to replace him and we will trade him in. Pretty simple. OK Reef.McKay has kicked amazingly straight this year. Have no confidence at all in Hayward kicking straight
Name the player you want to replace and we will trade him in. Pretty simple.
Name the player you want to replace him and we will trade him in. Pretty simple. OK Reef.
Apologies....Only Gulden will be a million plus, we will have a few on 800 odd.
Now you are changing your tune. Now we don't get rid of Hayward for band 2 compensation for a win win.Play Parker forward next year would be an option. You are thinking we have to trade in we don’t. Konstanty is a first round pick. I’m not saying get rid of Hayward but he’d be the last player to focus on keeping.