List Mgmt. 2024 Draft & Trade Hypotheticals

What should we get with our first two picks as they stand

  • Best Available for both

    Votes: 26 29.9%
  • Small forward/Small Defender

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPD/Small Forward

    Votes: 9 10.3%
  • Mid/KPD

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • KPD/Defender

    Votes: 19 21.8%
  • KPF/Small Forward

    Votes: 7 8.0%
  • KPF/Mid

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • KPF/Defender

    Votes: 23 26.4%

  • Total voters
    87

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Its fine but i wish we had the chance to catch one of the fallen top 10s but feels like we are now going to be an extra 2-3 picks down with these compensation picks added

Our future 1 is there don’t be shocked if we flip it
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Our future 1 is there don’t be shocked if we flip it
Problem with what im seeing is that non will really want to jump back, mostly due to the STK double and Freo double clumping the area we would want to jump into
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 1.08.48 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 1.08.48 PM.png
    41.2 KB · Views: 11
Problem with what im seeing is that non will really want to jump back, mostly due to the STK double and Freo double clumping the area we would want to jump into

I’d see if Saints have any interest in a 2 for 1 deal
 
Like lets be real if Perryman was traded it would be an F2 imo that he goes for. Therefore compensation should be end of second because given you let his contract get to that point
The reason I don't like it as such a basic and easy way to get band 1 is what will happen in the future when clubs learn how to build properly. Richmond has pulled the trigger on the rebuild so if they had a couple of decent FAs this year that would bring them back band 1 they would get 1-2-3.

Oh and the fact that it is clearly subjective and not at all about a "formula"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top