Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,621
- 252,389
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #18,956
2024 Picks
2025 Picks
2025 Picks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Reminds me of Tom Murphy but could also be a Gilham when he plays well.Is Marchbank any good and worth a look? Looked to do a couple of nice things on the weekend against the Dogs.
I’ve watched all the championships games in full. to call it ordinary is simply wrong. There is little likelihood of a Harley Reid sure, but this is a strong draft where all the experts who usually only do a top 20 at this stage of the year, have all said they had to push to 30 given the depth. Give the positional variety as well there could be superstars given time to develop especially KP. To trade out especially when we are trying to fast track our rise makes no sense.
Dude is made of glass. Has been less durable than Wingard.Is Marchbank any good and worth a look? Looked to do a couple of nice things on the weekend against the Dogs.
I rate him.Nick Hind on the cheap?
As a tackling bag at training??Nick Hind on the cheap?
Bloke butchers the ball and has horrible decision making, no thanksNick Hind on the cheap?
If Bailey Smith came to us we shouldn’t be handing over our first for him if it’s around 7 or 8, we should split it so we still have a first round pick, that we can go to the draft with or make another trade with, as it’s to much to trade with.
In 2016 We traded pick 14 for Tom Mitchell who was 24 at the time the same age Smith will be when he would play his first game for us.
Smith has play 103 games
Mitchell had played 65 games
Smith is coming off a ACL injury.
Mitchell the year before he was traded had his best year for the Swans and was one of Swans best in the 2016 Grand final loss against the Dogs in his last game for the swans.
Cost would be high, Marshall would deserve first ruck based on output and not sure Hawks would offer that so why would he request a trade away from a team who have salary cap to burn and where he has that role already?
Marshall is like Meek but gets more of the ball, and he doesn't use the ball particularly well. I like the balance we have.
Chasing Marshall would just be tying effort and resources up in the wrong place.
What type of ruckman is Reeves then? He's not a Meek type.The ruck rule has seemingly impacted jumping ruckman more than anything, which Reeves is not. If Reeves became stronger then the rule would benefit him. He's been replaced my Meek because Meek is now fit enough to have an impact around the ground and he throws his weight around.
Also, as everyone else has pointed out there's absolutely no way we'd be interested in Marshall whilst we have Meek on the list.
He will ( possibly ) have a surf park on the other side of the mordi fwy - pretty much a stones throw away… latest stage of planning just approved.. No doubt there are a lot more hurdles left though.Has anyone thought to offer Bailey a lifetime supply of free surfboards? It’s no home and land package but he might surf one day and we need to be in on the ground floor
Tap onlyWhat type of ruckman is Reeves then? He's not a Meek type.
And down the line relieving Mark!Tap only
FTFY…. give Finn Callaghan a godfather offer in 2025.
Make it Happen!
Insert Old El Paso GirlFTFY
Marshall gets more disposals than Meek because Meek taps it to teammates whereas Marshall grabs it and kicks it to the opposition.Like some have mentioned already trying to acquire Marshall (as good as he is) would be a gross negligence of our salary cap space. We have a 210cm Ned Reeves as a more than capable back up who if not for the ruck rule changes would've likely been our #1 ruck that is contracted for another 2 more seasons (RFA at the end of 2026).
Looking at the stats below as KermitJagger mentions yes Marshall get's a lot more of the ball (14.2 kicks per game) but with our young midfield brigade it's not the be all end all of what we need and one could argue that what Meek offers (36.6 hitouts per game / 8.8 handballs per game) suits our faster running style better.
Lastly both guys spend around about 85% of the time on the ground which would negate each other as neither is really the type to rest as a forward target.
IMO the huge cost for Marshall would be a waste of not only salary cap but also the draft collateral to obtain him which should be used in other areas that need to be filled (KPD + dynamic mid / forward). Marshall is a UFA at the end of 2027 and the Saints would ask for the world.
View attachment 2052090
Reeves is a Beanpole ruck, if he bulked up into a tower ruck like Sandilands he'd dominate the taps (which to be fair he did last season). However he already struggles to get around the ground and keep up, I doubt extra weight would help with that.The ruck rule has seemingly impacted jumping ruckman more than anything, which Reeves is not. If Reeves became stronger then the rule would benefit him. He's been replaced my Meek because Meek is now fit enough to have an impact around the ground and he throws his weight around.
Also, as everyone else has pointed out there's absolutely no way we'd be interested in Marshall whilst we have Meek on the list.
I meant judging against form as U18s, not as rookie AFL listed players.It’s an arbitrary game but I will play. Of top 10 Duursma and sanders have been in and out, Curtin read caddy have hardly played.
I would rate ashcroft smith trainor lalor Draper and maybe osullivan (not done well returning from injury but will be elite) ahead of those.
You said yourself you are waiting for highlights that’s not much to genuinely assess the draft crop.
I reckon if I could choose any player in the comp to join the hawks it would be him or Reid.bailey smith would be ok...
But I would do unspeakable things to get Finn Callaghan to the club.
Absolute class.