Pick sliding for FA compo absolutely affects the player taken, pick sliding for FS/Academy bid matching doesn’t really as no one is considering Ashcroft, Lombard, Kako or Marshal as an option to take as they all know the club will match (possibly not if someone goes Kako before the bombers first pick) but you get what I’m saying. Pick 9 is still the 9th best player on the open market regardless of if they get taken at 10,11 or 13
I guess we see this differently, but there's more a pick than the open market options. They are bargaining chips.
Imagine, for example, being Brisbane and having a phone call to Richmond about whether or not they'll need to match a #1 bid? As opposed to matching a bid from a club with #5?
What if Brisbane needs capital to match a #1 bid and someone else is offering to trade them a point surplus, but that surplus diminishes due to 2-3 slides beforehand?
I'm confident these conversations happen and there's more to it that '9th best player on the open market'. Lots of variables I suspect most clubs would look at 9+10 this year and say 'well that's basically 11+12 at least'.
Dylan Shiel is the best one. AA and under contract. Was trending towards being the best player in the league if you can remember that far back, bursting out of packs - before his injuries.
Went for pick #9 and a future first in return for Shiel and a future second round pick.
So that would be #9 and F1 from Freo for Bolton and Richmond's future 2nd, or third given Richmond's second isn't projecting to be much later than Fremantle's future first.
Fair post.
My only feedback would be that I think over recent years we are seeing clubs show less value in picks and more value in established players. He was traded 6 years ago. Do you think that deal would satisfy GWS in today's climate? I'm not convinced.