List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets

[freodog]

Yeh I believe it won't be until next year but he would be a prime target if it was.

 

[FUS_RO_DAH]

I genuinely don't want us to trade out any player for like, five years minimum.

I'm exhausted.

 

[Waterhouzin]

Haven’t they ruled out mid year trades for this year at least? Otherwise good plan!

My Time Machine may be a year out? Those things can be bloody temperamental


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[pK75]

I genuinely don't want us to trade out any player for like, five years minimum.

I'm exhausted.

Unfortunately with the list we are building, some quite good players will be leaving for greater opportunities elsewhere.

Edit: here’s this years list of players whose contracts expired in 2024, we need to delist/trade at least 3 main list players. If we trade someone in, that’s 4 from the main list we need to remove.
Sturt
Emmett
Stanley(R)
Wagner
NOD
Knobel
Banfield
Hughes
Tabs
Reidy(R)
Williams(B)
Jones(R)
Kuek(R)
Corbett

This is my priority ranking of importance to keep, so Corbett, Tabs and Hughes would all be in the firing line, Banfield if we get McDonald.

 

[ignoramus]

Unfortunately with the list we are building, some quite good players will be leaving for greater opportunities elsewhere.

Edit: here’s this years list of players whose contracts expired in 2024, we need to delist/trade at least 3 main list players. If we trade someone in, that’s 4 from the main list we need to remove.
Sturt
Emmett
Stanley(R)
Wagner
NOD
Knobel
Banfield
Hughes
Tabs
Reidy(R)
Williams(B)
Jones(R)
Kuek(R)
Corbett

This is my priority ranking of importance to keep, so Corbett, Tabs and Hughes would all be in the firing line, Banfield if we get McDonald.

5 players, no? assuming we pick up 2 of the train-ons via SSP, or 1 and 1 from the mid-year draft, that is. There's scope to delist and rookie one or two. E.g. Reidy's fate is not looking good. Williams and Kuek are 50/50, you'd think. With Corbett (also 50/50 at best), that's 4. Have to trade/delist someone else, or only take the 1 SSP/MSD.

 

[Docker82]

5 players, no? assuming we pick up 2 of the train-ons via SSP, or 1 and 1 from the mid-year draft, that is. There's scope to delist and rookie one or two. E.g. Reidy's fate is not looking good. Williams and Kuek are 50/50, you'd think. With Corbett (also 50/50 at best), that's 4. Have to trade/delist someone else, or only take the 1 SSP/MSD.

Yep. Can't really count Corbett or Kuek if we've already replaced them.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Unfortunately with the list we are building, some quite good players will be leaving for greater opportunities elsewhere.

Edit: here’s this years list of players whose contracts expired in 2024, we need to delist/trade at least 3 main list players. If we trade someone in, that’s 4 from the main list we need to remove.
Sturt
Emmett
Stanley(R)
Wagner
NOD
Knobel
Banfield
Hughes
Tabs
Reidy(R)
Williams(B)
Jones(R)
Kuek(R)
Corbett

This is my priority ranking of importance to keep, so Corbett, Tabs and Hughes would all be in the firing line, Banfield if we get McDonald.

I can get 3-4 to delist there reasonably easily. Important to note that if we sign Voss and someone else this year it will likely be two more that will need to come off

 

[pK75]

I can get 3-4 to delist there reasonably easily. Important to note that if we sign Voss and someone else this year it will likely be two more that will need to come off

You can’t include rookies or cat B rookies though, they must come off the main list. 3-4 is Corbett, Hughes, Tabs and Banfield.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

You can’t include rookies or cat B rookies though, they must come off the main list. 3-4 is Corbett, Hughes, Tabs and Banfield.

I think we've been through this but you can include rookies because you would just move someone else to the rookie list from those out of contract. Functionally little difference these days (Cat B is different)

 

[pK75]

I think we've been through this but you can include rookies because you would just move someone else to the rookie list from those out of contract. Functionally little difference these days (Cat B is different)

Are we allowed to place Hughes and Banfield on the rookie list again(I know the answer is yes) how many years have they each spent there?

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Are we allowed to place Hughes and Banfield on the rookie list again(I know the answer is yes) how many years have they each spent there?

Yeah not sure (I imagine there is some kind of restriction) but any one of those names could go on the rookie list IMO

 

[Joao]

Banners will get snapped up if we try to move him to the rookie list. Not often you get a free hit at a 40 goal forward.

 

[Taylor]

Banfield and Hughes can both get to the rookie list with zero issue, if it got to the point of being delisted for that process. Both are unrestricted free agents for life and if they have outside interest they will walk. Just like Hamling.

 

[vidwhal]

If Knobel starts dominating at peel this year, I can see his currency rise quite dramatically, he may only need a couple of game at senior level to get clubs interested.
Murphy has a few years of development ahead of him before he starts dominating at WAFL level.

I can totally see him being the "next great ruck" in the future. He's got some fine attributes for sure.
Will make for some good match up viewing when he's up against Darcy 2030.

 

[vidwhal]

If curtin shows any decent form at all he would cost an absolute bomb in trade capital. Adelaide would be ruthless to deal with too.

We should probably keep rolling our current firsts forward in trades each year until the iron's hot.

 

[Docker82]

You can’t include rookies or cat B rookies though, they must come off the main list. 3-4 is Corbett, Hughes, Tabs and Banfield.

Can't include Category B rookes but imo you can include other rookies.

You can always delist and re-rookie fringe senior listed players to make it all work.

 

[vidwhal]

A third round pick is just about worthless nowadays anyway so it not a huge deal I don’t think

Until you scratch that ground and pull out that gem. But I get your context.

 

[vidwhal]

Banners will get snapped up if we try to move him to the rookie list. Not often you get a free hit at a 40 goal forward.

At 192cm, I do think he'd get an offer elsewhere. As you say, a free hit.

 

[Docker82]

At 192cm, I do think he'd get an offer elsewhere. As you say, a free hit.

He's a free agent anyway.

Unless he establishes himself as best 22 we'll probably offer him one year at best. If he gets offered two elsewhere he's probably gone.

It's probably one of Sturt, Emmett, Banfield and whatever SPP we pick up (Voss/Beattie) to be delisted at year's end

I don't think Sturt needs anything more than 2-3 good games to move into re-sign category. Emmett is pretty much the same imo. Banfield is a bit older so probably needs to be best 22 to get much more than one year.

 

[DQ 4EVER]

My Time Machine may be a year out? Those things can be bloody temperamental


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

get the hot tub version

 

[DQ 4EVER]

Banners will get snapped up if we try to move him to the rookie list. Not often you get a free hit at a 40 goal forward.

by which WAFL team?

 

[Joao]

by which WAFL team?

Tonga Bob

Time to flex that mod muscle.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

No rolling firsts into next year, we just basically peaced out of the last two drafts (no 1st round picks). If we dont want to use 4 top end picks, amalgamate a couple of them to get a player we really rate.

 

[Tonga Bob]

Tonga Bob

Time to flex that mod muscle.

Imma creatively edit some of their posts.

 

[freo_leo29]

The thing that will hurt more is missing out on Curtin at pick 8. WA guy, good talent to build around.
Could've traded up for Pick 8, given it was losing value the more Curtin slipped down.
Getting Reid AND Curtin would've been raving all pre season.

They had pick 1(2024) on the table for Curtin

Couldn't offer much more than that, GWS decided they wanted to stay in last years draft and WCE didn't have a pick high enough to make it work, can't really fault them for it, pick 30 odd wasn't anywhere near enough to get to 8