- Aug 9, 2019
- 35,239
- 61,360
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
I think Hamish said that on trade radio subsequently?I think the club thought Butters would slip to the McHenry pick. Was reported we liked him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Semi Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think Hamish said that on trade radio subsequently?I think the club thought Butters would slip to the McHenry pick. Was reported we liked him.
Not sure but remember we were linked to him in the lead up.I think Hamish said that on trade radio subsequently?
Hmm maybe if younger players were played earlier they’d have more experience…So we've had the youngest & least experienced team all year, yet the Cartel would have us believe that we're not playing the kids enough?
One of the key reasons why we've been so inconsistent is the lack of age & experience in our team. That's not to say that we should have been playing "cooked" players like Brodie Smith. It's saying that we don't have enough experienced AFL-standard players on our list - a problem which is exacerbated by the deterioration of the senior players we do have.
Yes the club has timed their debuts just right, every single one of them, none were ready earlierYou mean not letting the BF Cartel get their hands on shiny new toys, before the toys are ready to be played with?
Putting games into duds - Murphy being the prime (and almost only) example - can be justified on the basis of a lack of alternatives. We simply don't have anyone with whom to replace him. I really wish we did, but the fact is that we don't. This is why the recruitment of ANB is so important (infinitely more important than Luko).
The difference is that BF is disrespectful, and very quick to hang. They're the kings of knee-jerk reactions.The issue is Nicks took too long when it was so obvious even Big Footy posters knew it months ago. Better late than never I guess but what if he resort to the same next year.......
Hawthorn didn't gut their list as extensively as we did ours. They still have quality veterans sprinkled throughout the side, supporting their kids. Our veterans have hit the cliff.Compare Mitchell who started the rebuild to Nicks.
That tells you all you need to know how much having a coach who knows what they are doing makes a difference.
Nicks is still on his learner plates after 5 years making new & repeat mistakes... which won't change in the future, because he really isn't up to it.
The fact our club management don't realise means they need a clean out too as incapable of making good key decisions.
It's interesting. Gunston looked well past it last year, and Bruest looked gone ages ago, yet they have had a real rejuvenation under Mitchell. That's a point in favour of giving them a cahnce, rather than axing them.Hawthorn didn't gut their list as extensively as we did ours. They still have quality veterans sprinkled throughout the side, supporting their kids. Our veterans have hit the cliff.
Reckon Hawthorn knew the right ones to move on, tooHawthorn didn't gut their list as extensively as we did ours. They still have quality veterans sprinkled throughout the side, supporting their kids. Our veterans have hit the cliff.
Twomey acting on his intel had us taking Caldwell with our 1st and Butters with our 2nd. Jones he had linked to Geelong.Not sure but remember we were linked to him in the lead up.
Who knows, maybe we nearly did take him at 9.
Hindsight obviously what we should have done.
That or offer up 9 and 16 to Brisbane for the Rozee pick.
As for those that think you don’t need senior players with a young side look at hawthorn
Plenty of experience scattered around the ground
Difference is they perform their roles and they don’t need to be central roles like we seem to give ours when often not deserved
What?Hawthorn didn't gut their list as extensively as we did ours. They still have quality veterans sprinkled throughout the side, supporting their kids. Our veterans have hit the cliff.
I was agreeing with youI said that previously just above
I suspect Vader’s talking about the 2019/20 exodusWhat?
Hawks cut harder than us.
Forget the criticism they got for trading out Mitchell & O'Meara?
They have no more veterans than us!
I think the club thought Butters would slip to the McHenry pick. Was reported we liked him.
Agree - Exactly what I’ve said ^!You always need experienced players but you need good experience. We needed to bring some in from other clubs. It's hurts alot of people to hear but our senior player don't provide good leadership.
Hawthorn have Gunston who looked washed up at brisbane and Breust who plays peripheral roles and subWhat?
Hawks cut harder than us.
Forget the criticism they got for trading out Mitchell & O'Meara?
They have no more veterans than us!
Chayce probably be a star at the catsTwomey acting on his intel had us taking Caldwell with our 1st and Butters with our 2nd. Jones he had linked to Geelong.
I wonder how Chayce would have turned out at the Cats?
Sure, but that's similar or less than the experienced players we have. We have Tex, Smith & Laird for starters.Hawthorn have Gunston who looked washed up at brisbane and Breust who plays peripheral roles and sub
Also guys like frost who would be our 2nd oldest player
It’s the way they use them , they still got them and they’re still important
The Hawks are like us last year when we just missed out on the 8 except none of their senior players are having the season Walker had, Smith was good when he got moved to the wing and Laird wasn't as shit. None have performed this year except for Walker who had an ok season.Sure, but that's similar or less than the experienced players we have. We have Tex, Smith & Laird for starters.
Trying to claim the Hawks have the edge on us because of experienced players is BS.
I would be surprise if the Hawks cut as hard as us end of 2019 and 2020 then we loss B.Crouch, Kelly and Atkins to FA.What?
Hawks cut harder than us.
Forget the criticism they got for trading out Mitchell & O'Meara?
They have no more veterans than us!
They did & were criticised for cutting too farI would be surprise if the Hawks cut as hard as us end of 2019 and 2020 then we loss B.Crouch, Kelly and Atkins to FA.
Who said thatSure, but that's similar or less than the experienced players we have. We have Tex, Smith & Laird for starters.
Trying to claim the Hawks have the edge on us because of experienced players is BS.
I’d say that if I was him tooI think Hamish said that on trade radio subsequently?
That's how this conversation started...Who said that
Wow this board is funny
All I did was say that some senior players in your side are necessary
Basically said ours don’t help us enough
I seriously think you would be better off not being a Mod here mate. Your resentment (hatred?) and clear bending of the truth would be more palatable that way. Just not healthy and quite unprecedented from any other BF Mod I have ever seen.The only reason we've been forced to replace senior players with kids is because we didn't plan for the future and have stalled the rebuilt as a result
Here's an example
In 2020 we go into the season with Brodie Smith on 167 games and Josh Worrell on 0 games. What Nicks did was give Smith a further 95 AFL games, and Worrell 29 games. While not a direct replacement, by the time Nicks "retires" Smith, a defensive replacement we have for him hasn't even played 30 games.
If in 2020 we traded Smith and backed in Worrell, now at the end of 2024 our replacement is no longer a kid, but (by my maths, factoring in injuries) a 70 game player.
Let's say at the end of 2021 we go to a Rory Sloane (211 games) or Rory Laird (160 games) and say, thanks mate, you're not required in the midfield moving forward. We just drafted Luke Pedlar with a first round pick and he's a midfielder.
Instead of handing out an extra 44 games to Sloane or 86 games to Laird in the midfield, we develop Pedlar instead. He goes from our current reality of being a 30 game player in 2024, to a 60+ game player. In an alternate reality when Sloane retires (or would have retired if he kept playing) we'd have a 60 game replacement right there, not a kid, or a Billy Dowling or Zac Taylor
Maybe those decisions don't pan out, Pedlar doesn't become the player we want, Worrell doesn't succeed. But going down an alternate route means that in 2024 their replacements are ready to go AFL players.