List Mgmt. 2024 National Draft - November 20-21

[Jen2310]

 

[Matt_352]

Can’t wait until we pick no KPP and people start sooking on here.

If we pick no kpp I'd say there would be riots. Would make zero sense not to pick a couple kpp

 

[celestial]

If we pick no kpp I'd say there would be riots. Would make zero sense not to pick a couple kpp

Not to mention we are going to have late picks in this years and next years draft, at some stage we are going to have to draft multiple kpp . May as well do it in a draft with great depth of talent.

 

[sr36]

Isaiah Winder has built up his body and had a great year in the WAFL playing midfield. Could be a good option

A lot of SA and WA links to us.

 

[TradeDraft]

Seems like a mid/fwd is high on list

The Hine Type instead of Proper Talls

 

[Jen2310]

The Hine Type instead of Proper Talls

he's 190cm though

 

[TradeDraft]

he's 190cm though

He is a General Type FWD/Backman can go thru the Midfield

Hine loves those types

 

[Jen2310]

He is a General Type FWD/Backman can go thru the Midfield

Hine loves those types

A fyfe type they say

 

[celestial]

I think hine is also looking for a player to eventually replace Jack crisp

25

Jack Crisp

Age

31

Ht

190cm

Wt

91kg

Pos.

D/M

Career

Season

Last 5

D

21.2

5star

K

11.5

4star

HB

9.7

5star

M

4.6

4star

T

4.0

5star

MG

307.6

4star

D

17.7

4star

K

10.7

4star

HB

7.0

4star

M

5.1

5star

T

1.6

3star

MG

307.6

4star

D

14.4

4star

K

8.4

4star

HB

6.0

4star

M

2.8

3star

T

3.0

5star

as he is 31. At 190cm his flexibility has been invaluable, don't know where this side would be without his ability to play multiple positions.
Given that it usually takes a draftee 2 - 3 years to find his footing in the afl, it makes some sense to target someone in this years draft.

 

[Vinnie Vegas]

Yea we should draft 4, I would rather take someone like polkinghorne over taking aj in the rookie draft.

We're not going to do that. It's not a consideration. AJ and Markov are getting picked up in the rookie draft no matter what. Clubs don't do that to players when they've committed to rookie-listing the players. Absolutely 0% chance of Collingwood going back on their word.

 

[Vinnie Vegas]

Take the Rayner type over the Butters type.

Yeah but sometimes you think you're taking the Butters type over the Rayner type and you're actually taking Tom Scully and Jack Trengove over Dustin Martin. It's not as easy as dismissing the "type" of player.

 

[sr36]

Yeah but sometimes you think you're taking the Butters type over the Rayner type and you're actually taking Tom Scully and Jack Trengove over Dustin Martin. It's not as easy as dismissing the "type" of player.

It's risk versus reward. However, I'm with Manic and think they go the dynamic athlete a bit too much over the pure footballer.

 

[Jen2310]

Draft picks: 52, 55, 60, 66, 82 (likely to use three selections)


Collingwood has the latest start to the draft of any club. Its first pick – currently No.52 – will come in a handful of spots once bids rule out other selections, but it won't be a significant rise. The Pies are set to use three picks at the draft and have been looking at talls in their region of picks. If Dandenong defender Noah Mraz got through to their pick, the Magpies would likely pounce, while they have also looked at defensive trio Riak Andrew (tied to Melbourne's NGA), Adrian Cole (St Kilda NGA) and Lachie Voss as well as South Australian forward Charlie West. Clancy Dennis, a key back who is recovering from foot surgery, has also been considered by the Pies. They have also done work on some athletic midfield/forward options in Richmond VFL talent Sam Davidson, Tasmanian Nathaniel Sulzberger, Northern Knight Lucas McInerney and Sydney Academy runner Joel Cochran. Don't be surprised if the Pies pull a bid on the Swans midfielder, who ran the best 2km time trial at the Draft Combine.

Cal Twomey's Phantom Draft: Top 30, late picks, whispers

Who will your club take in this year's AFL Draft? Our guru makes the call

www.afl.com.au

 

[Jen2310]

Going by this sounds like we want a key forward, key back and a mid forward


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[celestial]

Going by this sounds like we want a key forward, key back and a mid forward


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wonder which two of 52,55 ,60,66 we will use to move up the draft board.(Assuming we plan on drafting 3).

 

[satanshoof101]

Going by this sounds like we want a key forward, key back and a mid forward


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think we were linked to Lachie Voss in the mid season draft.

 

[SchuPie]

 

[Soups]

Best available incoming.

 

[Apex36]

Best available incoming.

“We had several KPP options, but in the end we couldn’t look past [insert vanilla half back flank here] at our pick, as he was really high on our draft board. We felt his lack of exposure to elite pathways, late birthday, and basketball background were just too good to pass up.”
[Insert something about levers here]

 

[sr36]

Best available incoming.

They kind of have to if you see a decent gap, don't they? How can you go, well we think this guy is a much better prospect but we're going to pick this guy instead. It'd be pretty incompetent.

 

[TradeDraft]

Going by this sounds like we want a key forward, key back and a mid forward


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We have to at least take 1 Tall

 

[soreplums]

It's just tough. They're trying to predict the future and there's a lot of guesswork involved. I think there's a bit of FOMO too sometimes leading to the blokes who have the occasional wow moment going higher than the sure thing, you don't want to miss Buddy or Dusty when you had a shot at them.

Bring back the Tambling and JON recruiting team!

 

[celestial]

Say we trade 52 and 55 to move up to somewhere like 42/43, I can see that pick being best player available. Then use the remaning picks to address the needs.

 

[HFF]

No vanilla type attributes
Where we are picking from is cherry ripe for picking players who have something outs adding about them, even if it’s just one trait.
Sure they will lack in consistency and in most categories but as long as they have one outstanding trait ie speed, or a vertical leap, or X factor around goals, etc that’s the type of players we should be going for.

Do not select the good all rounder types that are merely average in very category without any special skill to excel at the top level

 

[TradeDraft]

“We had several KPP options, but in the end we couldn’t look past [insert vanilla half back flank here] at our pick, as he was really high on our draft board. We felt his lack of exposure to elite pathways, late birthday, and basketball background were just too good to pass up.”
[Insert something about levers here]

Sounds like Hine.

Though I heard this is his Final Draft at Collingwood

 

[Albert Parker]

I think we were linked to Lachie Voss in the mid season draft.

They had him more commonly linked to Melbourne. But you might be on the right path.
He'd suit our needs at 199cm, athletic (good leap and a low 6's 2K time trial time) and able to play both ends.
2 x premiership player with Sandy Dragons, so part of a strong team when he's been available.
His grandfather (Ernie Hug) played for Collingwood too, albeit he barracks for the Hawks