- Jul 24, 2018
- 2,278
- 8,937
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Not just saying this cause they both have Murphy in their name but Reid reminds me of Marc a lot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Have you seen Austin's eyes? He might get a F1They would call out bluff if we are too greedy. So an F3 would be enough for them to burn to definitely secure Draper
Agree. What’s the worst case scenario if they called our bluff…ending up with Smith at #4? We don’t have a lot of leverage tbh.They would call out bluff if we are too greedy. So an F3 would be enough for them to burn to definitely secure Draper
Huge fan but his athletic profile won’t be what we are after. I’m sure we will draft Draper and bring another average ball user into the squad alongside the campo twins who can’t kick over a jam tin.Surely Murphy Reid is a choice for us he’s a beautiful kick
This is a solid melt over absolutely nothing.Huge fan but his athletic profile won’t be what we are after. I’m sure we will draft Draper and bring another average ball user into the squad alongside the campo twins who can’t kick over a jam tin.
That’s the spiritHuge fan but his athletic profile won’t be what we are after. I’m sure we will draft Draper and bring another average ball user into the squad alongside the campo twins who can’t kick over a jam tin.
Yep. With this. Langford and jagga to me. If you could only pick 2 this draft to end up HOFers I'd back themThat’s how I read it at as well. Pace is great but Cripps, Bont etc aren’t quick players at all
Only time will tell but I see a lot in the kid especially his poise and ability to step up when needed
My gut feel he is mentally very tough
more pendles I thinkNot just saying this cause they both have Murphy in their name but Reid reminds me of Marc a lot
I’ve already done a 180 and now want Draper. Ask me again in 24 hours.This is a solid melt over absolutely nothing.
I’ve already done a 180 and now want Draper. Ask me again in 24 hours.
Yep. With this. Langford and jagga to me. If you could only pick 2 this draft to end up HOFers I'd back them
We can’t waste this pick on potential. This guy has to deliver something we don’t have consistently. Speed and aggression. FOS has all the tools but Sid the kid is all grunt and has proven he can do it against men week in and week out. I’m on board.
I'm very opinionated on the matter but taking a step back I really don't think we can go wrong at this pick. All the players in the mix would add to our list short term and long term. Still have my preferences but we are in a great spot.We can’t waste this pick on potential. This guy has to deliver something we don’t have consistently. Speed and aggression. FOS has all the tools but Sid the kid is all grunt and has proven he can do it against men week in and week out. I’m on board.
so do I where my vote standsI’ve already done a 180 and now want Draper. Ask me again in 24 hours.
This is in Phantom Draft thread, but I thought I'd drag it across here. Just my thought, if we're worried about someone else bidding on Lucas, I don't see why we wouldn't take him, and then take another player in the Rookie Draft. In the end, I don't think the overall outcome would be significantly different either way...It's a good question, and I don't know (tried looking this up the other day, and can't find a definitive answer). What I do know is that the passed pick is removed from the draft order. i.e. if Carlton pass at pick 52 and Geelong have pick 53, that pick shuffles down, and Geelong now have pick 52.
Logic would dictate that Carlton should still be able to use later picks for matching purposes (but not use them otherwise), but I really don't know if that is the case.
Note also, we can't guarantee last spot in the draft, as there could be further bid matching after the Ben Campo bid. i.e. picks we used to match Ben get moved to the back of the draft, but if there's then a bid on say Malakai Champion and West Coast match, then the picks they used would be moved behind the ones we used.
NoDoes Sid Draper remind anyone else of GWS Dylan Shiel?PLAYERCARDSTART9Dylan Shiel
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 182cm
- Wt
- 84kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 24.6
- 5star
- K
- 12.3
- 5star
- HB
- 12.2
- 5star
- M
- 3.1
- 3star
- T
- 3.9
- 5star
- CL
- 4.9
- 5star
- D
- 23.4
- 5star
- K
- 13.6
- 5star
- HB
- 9.8
- 5star
- M
- 2.2
- 2star
- T
- 3.4
- 4star
- CL
- 6.4
- 5star
- D
- 19.8
- 5star
- K
- 8.4
- 4star
- HB
- 11.4
- 5star
- M
- 2.4
- 3star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- CL
- 3.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
For me, FOS at his best would probably be the best option (assuming Lalor is gone). But I’ve watched lots of full games and notice how passive he can be. Never takes a game by the throat. Gets caught with the ball a lot and just not sure he’s proven the hype.I'm very opinionated on the matter but taking a step back I really don't think we can go wrong at this pick. All the players in the mix would add to our list short term and long term. Still have my preferences but we are in a great spot.
FOS the biggest question mark as he's arguably the best 'fit' in terms of what strengths he brings, but also the most inconsistent/potential based selection.
Nick Austin when discussing our list needs at the draft:Think we need to consider Reid. Kicking is lethal
I think most supporters would give a lot to get a Butters clone in our team right now.Langford, FOS, and Lalor have the biggest potential of being game changing stars IMO. Jagga is the safest choice. Pretty much a Butters clone. It’s Langford for me. He’s a Dawson type with his kicking but with a bit more mongrel. Wouldn’t be unhappy with Smith though.