- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Which in terms of pure football ability was pretty damn good.More I think about it, Draper has Jack Steven traits
I think decision making is one of the few things that can be seriously improved on with experience. Imagine Draper with AFL experience and confidence who finds the space that he can do with his speed and gut running - then with the ability to slow down and make the right decision. Getting into space is the hard part, he can improve what he does when he has the space.Shouldn't discount decision making as a factor, Jagga is a 360° player who looks like he's operating in bullet time whereas Draper undoes a lot of his good work by running into trouble before dishing off those loopy handballs
An elite midfielder will play about 300 games spanning about 10 years or so.Personally I have concerns about what Lalor and Finn can deliver in the first couple of years, Lalor with injury potential and FOS just due to lack of volume.
See my post in the context of the discussion leading to it.An elite midfielder will play about 300 games spanning about 10 years or so.
One shouldn’t be too concerned about the initial impact of the first 1 or 2 years as their bodies adjust to AFL seniors aerobic fitnesses and physical maturity demands. Every youngsters will adapt at their own peace abut it’s essential they have proper mentoring and support during the journey.
I could honestly see Richmond taking Tauru at 7Reckon North should accept Saints trade offer :
1.Richmond - Lalor
2.Brisbane - Ashcroft
3.St.Kilda - Smith
4.Carlton - O’Sullivan
5.Adelaide - Draper
6.Melbourne - Langford
7.Richmond - Smillie
8.North - Tauru
9.St.Kilda - Reid
10.Melbourne - Armstrong
*North now hold Saints 2025 1st pick
A player either has good footy IQ, meaning decision making , vision, reading and creating the play or just doesn’t, it’s a trait that just can’t be taught, it’s an innate talent, natural and can’t be replicated.I think decision making is one of the few things that can be seriously improved on with experience. Imagine Draper with AFL experience and confidence who finds the space that he can do with his speed and gut running - then with the ability to slow down and make the right decision. Getting into space is the hard part, he can improve what he does when he has the space.
I disagree. While some absolutely can't. I think it's naive to say that players can't improve their footy IQ and decision making and in fact I would say that is absolutely farcical.A player either has good footy IQ, meaning decision making , vision, reading the play or just doesn’t , this trait just can’t be taught, it’s innate talent that’s natural and can’t be replicated.
Tend to agree with this.A player either has good footy IQ, meaning decision making , vision, reading and creating the play or just doesn’t, it’s a trait that just can’t be taught, it’s an innate talent, natural and can’t be replicated.
I could honestly see Richmond taking Tauru at 7
Will be interesting to see how he goes. Struggled to dominate in a comp where he has a massive size advantage which will be lessened when he gets into the AFL. Will he just become smallish KPP like Francis or Fogarty.They could … but the mail is they love Smillie who theyd have to take at 7
Will be interesting to see how he goes. Struggled to dominate in a comp where he has a massive size advantage which will be lessened when he gets into the AFL. Will he just become smallish KPP like Francis or Fogarty.
We already have Brisbane's F2Am I going mad…(rhetorical)
…or did I just see a report from Cal that we've traded 38 for Brisbanes F2?
Ahhh … the joys of instagramWe already have Brisbane's F2
3weeks agoAm I going mad…(rhetorical)
…or did I just see a report from Cal that we've traded 38 for Brisbanes F2?
I think decision making is one of the few things that can be seriously improved on with experience. Imagine Draper with AFL experience and confidence who finds the space that he can do with his speed and gut running - then with the ability to slow down and make the right decision. Getting into space is the hard part, he can improve what he does when he has the space.
As I said in my post, clearly there are some who can't - i.e Young's greatest deficiency is that he has not improved his decision making, but I don't think that suggests it cannot be done.Can't agree with this, FBI - it's the difference between the Sam Mitchells and Nick Grahams of the world
As I said in my post, clearly there are some who can't - i.e Young's greatest deficiency is that he has not improved his decision making, but I don't think that suggests it cannot be done.
Particularly for a player like Draper who finds himself in space - decision making opportunities will arise because of that space. The difference in someone like Graham and his average athletic capabilities means he was always under pressure and never able to make better decisions. Draper should be able to generate both the physical and mental space to allow him to make better decisions and I think that will develop with experience.
Further, I think context matters. You look at players like Young and Graham and say they never improved their IQ but they weren't given the environment to do so. Neither have substantial AFL experience and experience at VFL level may actually have a negative influence on AFL level footy IQ because they may have more time or space at VFL level that compound their decision making flaws under higher pressure at AFL level. I think if you take any player playing 200+ games at AFL level their football IQ will increase overtime, it has to. In the case of a player like Draper his physical capabilities and talent give him the opportunity to come in and play AFL, even if his decision making may not currently be the best, but playing at the level and using his physical capabilities and talent to get him out of trouble at AFL level will allow him opportunities to grow and develop, that is not the same as a player like Graham or Young.
I think there are clearly opportunities to develop Footy IQ at AFL level and would say there has to be as a fact of life.
In my view the most important traits for great midfielders are ball-finding ability, evasiveness, decision making and quick disposal from congestion - if they can run on and create overlap even better.Shouldn't discount decision making as a factor, Jagga is a 360° player who looks like he's operating in bullet time whereas Draper undoes a lot of his good work by running into trouble before dishing off those loopy handballs
Whist I agree with you that players can improve their decision making in a professional environment where they are taught to do so... but, my question is to what extend?As I said in my post, clearly there are some who can't - i.e Young's greatest deficiency is that he has not improved his decision making, but I don't think that suggests it cannot be done.
Particularly for a player like Draper who finds himself in space - decision making opportunities will arise because of that space. The difference in someone like Graham and his average athletic capabilities means he was always under pressure and never able to make better decisions. Draper should be able to generate both the physical and mental space to allow him to make better decisions and I think that will develop with experience.
Further, I think context matters. You look at players like Young and Graham and say they never improved their IQ but they weren't given the environment to do so. Neither have substantial AFL experience and experience at VFL level may actually have a negative influence on AFL level footy IQ because they may have more time or space at VFL level that compound their decision making flaws under higher pressure at AFL level. I think if you take any player playing 200+ games at AFL level their football IQ will increase overtime, it has to. In the case of a player like Draper his physical capabilities and talent give him the opportunity to come in and play AFL, even if his decision making may not currently be the best, but playing at the level and using his physical capabilities and talent to get him out of trouble at AFL level will allow him opportunities to grow and develop, that is not the same as a player like Graham or Young.
I think there are clearly opportunities to develop Footy IQ at AFL level and would say there has to be as a fact of life.
I think decision making can be improved a lot easier, and a lot more naturally, than for example improving pace or agility. If anything, pace and agility are likely to decrease overtime with a bigger body and more knocks and niggles. I have Draper and Jagga 1 and 2 because of their all around attributes, I just think if we're comparing solely between Draper's speed and Jagga's decision making (which we're not), I think one of them is a lot harder to build - and I think that's the pace.Whist I agree with you that players can improve their decision making in a professional environment where they are taught to do so... but, my question is to what extend?
Of course players don't improve at the same pace for any given skill, but wouldn't you prefer someone that already have a higher base.
So in my mind, Smith is still my preferred player at #3
Jagga just strikes me as one of the smartest footballers you could possibly get. His positioning, planning, reaction time, decision making and ability to evade opponents in a phone booth and dispose of the ball quickly is just unmatched.
You look at his physique and think it’s a weakness but he is just so damn difficult to lay a glove on that it barely matters. Opponents may break a few of his tackles in his early years which would be the only concern.
What I love is how he gets involved in transition footy. He creates overlap run and when working alongside someone like Walsh I
think it will only amplify their strengths, rather than be redundant.
I see him as someone who can enhance our ability to cleanly exit stoppages and be part of a unit that can improve the flow of our transition footy and thereby give Charlie, Harry and Ashton more opportunities for 1on1 contests.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Agree our window of opportunity for another premiership is the next 2 to 3 years, thence my difficultly understanding why Austin chose to not chase Houston, Perryman or Bailey Smith, any of which would have strengthen our team immediately.See my post in the context of the discussion leading to it.
I am of the belief we need to focus on the best player out of the consensus top 4-5 picks that can deliver in the next 3 years to deliver a premiership while we have Cripps / Curnow / McKay / Weitering in their prime.