- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The supremely talented Sam Lalor appears to be firming as the favourite to be taken at pick 1 in next weeks National Draft. Unfortunately, calling these FULL season highlights is rather wishful thinking on my part as Lalor suffered through a series of injuries in 2024 which severely limited the amount of footy he was able to play.
That'd be Lindsay & Berry (14 & 16) after bid matches. Still quite tantalising.I shouldn't but I still look at having 12 & 14 and we could easily have had names like Travaglia & Lindsay who could be as good as most
We will get a gun at 3 but we could have had two that could have really helped us
Do you really feel the need to stress “again”.Note the word met "again"....
In order,To me, sounds like Draper first choice and fos second In Line.
Can’t wait to see how it plays out
Why not?Do you really feel the need to stress “again”.
It is an absolute given that we have had multiple meetings with the players in the vicinity of Pick 3. Probably had informal contact before this season commenced with the likes of Draper and FOS. Similarly, at this late stage, it is unlikely it is our first contact with West. These blokes are paid to do a job, they would number in the hundreds for annual interviews.
There is no need to suggest other posters are not aware that there are multiple contacts with the kids we have an interest in. If you believe a second (or more) meeting is an absolute indicator that we are selecting a player, you are way off base.
Yeah, gaming out what might happen with BC and pick 38 is super interesting. Who might bid on Campo? Which pick would we need to confidently get ahead of a bid? Who might be open to trade for an earlier pick? What might it cost us, given our limited trade hand? So much to consider.I think we should spend more time on dreaming about who we select with pick 38, when Campo does not get bid on.
Yeah, gaming out what might happen with BC and pick 38 is super interesting. Who might bid on Campo? Which pick would we need to confidently get ahead of a bid? Who might be open to trade for an earlier pick? What might it cost us, given our limited trade hand? So much to consider.
Hey hey, hey. We've spent over 100 pages flipping between three different options for pick 3. Surely we can afford to give poor old pick 38 a bit more time in the spotlight.We don't have any currency to trade up. It's not going to happen.
In terms of trading around a bid, it would be if a bid comes prior to 38, we would trade 38 for a F2, and match the bid with our later picks.
We would then try to trade 1 of our 2 F2s to get back into the draft.
In terms of that, it's praying that the bid doesn't come until after 38, and then who we want to take there.Hey hey, hey. We've spent over 100 pages flipping between three different options for pick 3. Surely we can afford to give poor old pick 38 a bit more time in the spotlight.
Am I right to assume we're only able to trade 38 out before a bid on Ben?In terms of that, it's praying that the bid doesn't come until after 38, and then who we want to take there.
As I understand it we can trade out pick 38 whilst "on the clock" to respond to a bid. Obviously we would have to have the deal pre-arranged in order to get it done in time and it would have to be a 2-parter ie trade out pick 38 for a future, match with what we then have in 2024 then trade back in to get a shot at someone we have our eye on, whether that be moving up or down from pick 38 - would probably be sensible to have one of each option agreed in principle so we could do whichever seemed needed giving how picks had gone up to the time of the bid on Ben. Over to Curly's boy ...In terms of that, it's praying that the bid doesn't come until after 38, and then who we want to take there.
If his footy is as good as his Uncle's music (Jason) we'll have a goodie here.Have to be happy with this
Pick 38. (Carlton) – Noah Mraz
Dandenong Stingrays/Vic Country –DEF, 198cm
The key defender was limited by injury earlier in the year, but showed promising signs with his aerial intercepting ability off half back and is able to read the play well and use his frame to push up the ground and go deeper down back.
As I understand it we can trade out pick 38 whilst "on the clock" to respond to a bid. Obviously we would have to have the deal pre-arranged in order to get it done in time and it would have to be a 2-parter ie trade out pick 38 for a future, match with what we then have in 2024 then trade back in to get a shot at someone we have our eye on, whether that be moving up or down from pick 38 - would probably be sensible to have one of each option agreed in principle so we could do whichever seemed needed giving how picks had gone up to the time of the bid on Ben. Over to Curly's boy ...Am I right to assume we're only able to trade 38 out before a bid on Ben is lodged?
Sure.Hey hey, hey. We've spent over 100 pages flipping between three different options for pick 3. Surely we can afford to give poor old pick 38 a bit more time in the spotlight.
So you have the right to quote posters suggesting they have overlooked an element in the media when they have just taken it as a given because it is common practice, yet take offence when your little point scoring exercise is called out.Why not?
And that (bolded) comment beggars belief.
It's not your job to tell others what they can and can't comment on...
Just a little thing on Sid i noticed. Shifter Sheehan listed him at 182cm on his official AFL Guide today. He had been getting around as 180cm's on various lists. Every lil bit helps.
Sid, Finn and Jagga all exactly 182cm on the up to date Shifter list. Lalor 187.
Hotton and Hynes still on the board.That'd be Lindsay & Berry (14 & 16) after bid matches. Still quite tantalising.
Link to what was said?
Do you really feel the need to stress “again”.
It is an absolute given that we have had multiple meetings with the players in the vicinity of Pick 3. Probably had informal contact before this season commenced with the likes of Draper and FOS. Similarly, at this late stage, it is k it is our first contact with West. These blokes are paid to do a job, they would number in the hundreds for annual interviews.
There is no need to suggest other posters are not aware that there are multiple contacts with the kids we have an interest in. If you believe a second (or more) meeting is an absolute indicator that we are selecting a player, you are way off base.
Am I right to assume we're only able to trade 38 out before a bid on Ben?
I thought I saw FOS listed at 184cm post combine