- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The good news is that I’m hearing there’s a decent chance St Kilda won’t have pick 32 come draft night.
Do tellThe good news is that I’m hearing there’s a decent chance St Kilda won’t have pick 32 come draft night.
Carlton are going to get in front of 32 and bid on ColeDo tell
Is this the draft thread??
I couldn't care less about ST Kilda.
Let's talk about the draft in this thread and players we are targeting.
Spot on Jimmae. I’m with you on this one.Planning is not the same as doing.
Fact is we have 7 open list spots, and the way you all want to play it out, we're only filling out 4 between the national and rookie draft. I don't think we're going to leave 3 spots to DFA, rookie and SSP.
We've got something in mind, that's for sure.
Okay JD but apart from:
- being SA’s Under 16 captain in 2022
- taking out the state Under 18 MVP in 2023
- going on to captain South Adelaide’s SANFL Under 18 premiership
- being awarded the AFL life members scholarship
- being one of only two players to make the All Australian U18 team in both 2023 and 2024
- having more senior experience than any top draft prospect in 2024,
...what has Draper done.
that left foot will slice any sideThe thing is, transition play isn't always about who's the fastest sprinter but rather who's the fastest across the length of the field. Langford was one of the top performers in the 2km time trial, and his running capacity is elite for his class. His 20m sprint is lower, but when it comes to the transition game and broader running capacity he'll be a positive contributor to it.
Most of the game isn't played in an all out sprint. In fact very little of it is.
ok I will me promiseRight, after going back and watching all the highlights of the draft prospects again for the 100th time
If we keep pick 3 I reckon we are going to go for FOS (if he’s available at 3)
It just makes sense in terms of what we need plus the strong family link with Walsh.
If he’s not there at 3 I reckon it’s Sid.
If we trade pick 3, which I genuinely think is a realistic possibility. It will be for overs in our favour. I’m not against this and I don’t see it as a slide like some are saying.
In a deep draft we could get 2-3 amazing players versus 1 potential gun.
That’s not a slide.
Ask me again tomorrow and I will have changed my mind again!
How is it a realistic possibility?? Seriously?Right, after going back and watching all the highlights of the draft prospects again for the 100th time
If we keep pick 3 I reckon we are going to go for FOS (if he’s available at 3)
It just makes sense in terms of what we need plus the strong family link with Walsh.
If he’s not there at 3 I reckon it’s Sid.
If we trade pick 3, which I genuinely think is a realistic possibility. It will be for overs in our favour. I’m not against this and I don’t see it as a slide like some are saying.
In a deep draft we could get 2-3 amazing players versus 1 potential gun.
That’s not a slide.
Ask me again tomorrow and I will have changed my mind again!
Is anyone saying we’ll only take 4?Planning is not the same as doing.
Fact is we have 7 open list spots, and the way you all want to play it out, we're only filling out 4 between the national and rookie draft. I don't think we're going to leave 3 spots to DFA, rookie and SSP.
We've got something in mind, that's for sure.
is Langford in the conversation for usI think this is an occams razor.
We traded up to get access to one of the very top liners in the draft.
or bid on youCarlton are going to get in front of 32 and bid on Cole
he's a gut runner. not quick. but runs hard from contest to contest. remember this is a 10 - 12yr player we're investing in, not just impacting straight awayI assumed Langford was out of calculations, so I hadn't done much research on him.
My apologies, he's not slow in any way that matters.
Probably the best player in the draft
On Pixel 7a using BigFooty.com mobile app
Which makes Langford such a great option because his both! He can make an immediate impact next year as well as being 250 plus game player!!!he's a gut runner. not quick. but runs hard from contest to contest. remember this is a 10 - 12yr player we're investing in, not just impacting straight away
Didn't I say he was probably the best player in the draft?he's a gut runner. not quick. but runs hard from contest to contest. remember this is a 10 - 12yr player we're investing in, not just impacting straight away
How is it a realistic possibility?? Seriously?
Austin did all that work to trade up to pick 3 to get one of the best kids in draft!!!! We are taking it to the draft
For me Langford should be last on that list as Carlton do not need another big lumbering type of player in the midfield as we already have enough in Cripps, Hewett and Cerra, and while he does have his unique set of skills the club are supposed to be looking at players with pace and more pace as we don`t have a player with that burst of speed out of the centre. To me Langford shapes as a taller version of Lalor but without his speed, and is more of a forward than a dead set mid......Does not solve our midfield quick extraction plan in my view......I really feel that Austin wants either FO`S or Draper, and as the so called draft specialists are saying.......Draper (baring injury!) is ready to step up from round 1 next season........hoping for one of those two, even though Smith is being compared to Cotchin by some. Doesn`t look like a sniper, but there you go!!!With all due respect to our genuine ITKs, none of them would have a complete understanding of who goes 1 and 2, and then you have the North scenario
I'd suspect we keen on any of Lalor, FOS, Smith, Draper, Langford, they all offer a unique skillset
I have those 5 ranked
Lalor
Langford
Draper
FOS
Smith
But it's a tight contest
combine either with walker who's our explosive playerWhich makes Langford such a great option because his both! He can make an immediate impact next year as well as being 250 plus game player!!!
All great options tbh - FOS, Langford, Lalor, Jagga and Draper
Cerra is a big lumbering type?For me Langford should be last on that list as Carlton do not need another big lumbering type of player in the midfield as we already have enough in Cripps, Hewett and Cerra, and while he does have his unique set of skills the club are supposed to be looking at players with pace and more pace as we don`t have a player with that burst of speed out of the centre. To me Langford shapes as a taller version of Lalor but without his speed, and is more of a forward than a dead set mid......Does not solve our midfield quick extraction plan in my view......I really feel that Austin wants either FO`S or Draper, and as the so called draft specialists are saying.......Draper (baring injury!) is ready to step up from round 1 next season........hoping for one of those two, even though Smith is being compared to Cotchin by some. Doesn`t look like a sniper, but there you go!!!
4 and F1st for 2 and F2nd would be my guess.Hey C4, can you elaborate what a deal might look like for North and Crows to make this happen. Crows have little outside of pick 4 and Roo's want to trade 2 to only move back a little but still get another pick in the first round. I just dont see how that happens?