- Moderator
- #4,082
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Too many issues? Which are what?No, that’s not what I said! Some posters have said they want him as they believe he can make a big difference to us in 2025. Which he could. I just don’t think he is a top 5 pick and think there’s too many issues in his game to be considered top 3
Hudson O'Keefe looks great thoughAlot of choice. Definitely need another ruck/fwd to develop under tdk.
So you haven’t watched him live. All goodToo many issues? Which are what?
Yep.Smith is an interesting one. Played for tigers reserves this year and dominated in the two's. Was tipped to go pick one mid way through the year.
Clubs would be making calls and working out where things are falling by process of elimination. They're analysing every team's list, they're paying attention to who's contacting them about trades, what the DFA/SSP situations look like.Problem is that to do that we have to trade out of pick 3 - and that's something you have to commit to early. There's no guarantee that Hotton and Hynes are available at the later picks we'd potentially secure, so taking that path is a gamble.
I think we're ok with Duffy and Haynes for now, and I don't rate KPDs in this draft as being above the second round.Jimmae - where’s your love for Hotton coming from. Frankly, I didn’t see a lot in those 3 games he played early. Seems like the Hotton clan is a bit fragile also with his brother getting cut through injury.
Also - Would you not look for a big if you’re losing 38 and obviously upgrading. Need a KPD most IMO.
If the Kako and Lombard bids come through before Port's first pick, it's more like 15 & 30 for 19 & 24, which is pretty even overall.Looks like Port could be shifting 13 and 29 to GWS for 16 and 21.
Sugar hit vs who Carlton groupthink believe to be the best long term player... er... - same thing!If we pick Draper it wont be for a sugar hit. The club will pick who they believe is the best long term player.
The top 5 are all quality and bring different qualities to the table despite some people picking holes in them.Sugar hit vs who Carlton groupthink believe to be the best long term player... er... - same thing!
I agree but also imagine Voss is saying things like... "let's use Harry and Charlie on the way out. If they don't mark it then they'll bring it to ground and let our smalls go to work. We can also use the king and crippa as those tall options too."Yeah maybe, but I would bet money that there isn't a coach in the league outside of Malthouse that says to their players "go super slow, wait until everyone is set up, then go long down the line and just punch it out of bounds if we can't take a mark".
I wonder how much the players are slowing things up trying not to turn over the ball only to invite defensive pressure?
I think I understand the sentiment. A lot of Carlton fans I’ve seen have talked about picking Draper purely because he makes us better next year, and that’s it. Whereas someone like Langford or FOS may take a couple of seasons to really hit their straps. Not saying that Draper isn’t going to be a fantastic player, I will be ecstatic if we get himCalling any junior player a “sugar hit” is…. Wow.
Anyone we draft this high, in a great draft, should be a quality player for a long time. Of course busts happen, but we need to have confidence that Austin will get a good quality player at Pick 3. I am comfortable with any of them.I think I understand the sentiment. A lot of Carlton fans I’ve seen have talked about picking Draper purely because he makes us better next year, and that’s it. Whereas someone like Langford or FOS may take a couple of seasons to really hit their straps. Not saying that Draper isn’t going to be a fantastic player, I will be ecstatic if we get him
“Sugar hit” is poor choice of wording, the premise I agree with.
Do u really want the developed, ultra professional kid.
He’s obviously worked his ass off, but u have to question what that loading does at a young age.
Yes it enables him to stand up day one, but is that what u really want?
IMO you want a few years of gradual build up, adding size/strength in a controlled environment.
Jagga is slight, but we would control his development.
Theres already questions about Drapers stress/load related back issues.
Walsh is the perfect example of ultra professional, super hard working/training who at 23 needed back surgery.
That’s not good!
That is not the development curve line u want.
Can’t bounceToo many issues? Which are what?
Draper made the all Australian U18 team in 2023 and 2024, along with Levi Ashcroft the only two players in this draft to do so, and is widely regarded as SA best U18 prospect.Can’t bounce
Can’t handball
Can’t kick
Doesn’t kick goals
This draft is the most overrated in history.So this will be the greatest draft in history?
Time will tell. I certainly regard it as deep, having options for most positions through at least two rounds. The growing hype around the top end is a bit out there, however, with Lombard projected outside top 5, I tend to be more inclined to believe it. The Tauru Train is just illogical, yet Armstrong, Shanahan and a couple of others are behind a heap of mids and role players, where traditionally the higher rated KPP are top 10 locks.This draft is the most overrated in history.
This is an interesting one, as we could hypothetically be a chance to nab Draper with a later pick if circumstances prevail. Its a big if, but this could be one scenario that may play out:And there you have it: Smith is probably a lock for top 3, just like I've been saying. Interested to see if we dangle FOS in front of Richmond if Adelaide do trade up to select Smith.
Draper would seem to be the slider of that top 8.
No way Clancy Dennis reaches the rookie draft. Cats are in to him as well, he will go in the ND, and quite likely higher than most think. ~38 is in the right range, not impossible he goes higherThis is an interesting one, as we could hypothetically be a chance to nab Draper with a later pick if circumstances prevail. Its a big if, but this could be one scenario that may play out:
Pick 1 - Rich - Sam Lalor
Pick 2 - Adel - Jagga Smith (trade up with north as mooted)
Pick 3 will likely be FOS, but to whom is the question... With Pick 4 likely to be Tauru to North, we would have to weigh up whether Melbourne would prefer Langford or Draper at 5 (or perhaps even Smillie), as there could be a possibility of sliding down to 6 to nab Draper if the Dees go with Langford.
Not sure why, but I just see Langford as a perfect fit for Melbourne, particularly with the recent trade requests from Oliver and Trac, and Viney not getting any younger - he would be my pick if I was them (or Smillie). I think Draper makes less sense for them since Trent Rivers move into midfield this season as well.
If Richmond are willing to trade up from 6 (and probably a Smillie pick) to pick 3 for FOS, I'd be looking at something along the lines of 3, 38 & 63 for 6, 20 & 23, which after bids looks more like 3, 40 & 52 for 7, 24 & 27, which is pretty fair in terms of draft points. Tigers could get some mature agers like Davidson and Bice for the later picks, so they don't overdo taking youngsters, while also nabbing FOS and preserving their other top 11 picks.
We could end up with Draper at #6, and take two more picks in the 1st round (my preferences being Harry Oliver and Ollie Hannaford - each to their own, all hypothetical), before a bid match on Ben Camporeale.
Think Clancy Dennis and Lucas Camporeale will be available in the rookie draft, otherwise we can always shift to a 38-4 list structure to take them on the senior list at the ND (although unlikely given salary cap benefits of additional rookies).
Haul of Draper, Oliver, Hannaford, B Campo, L Campo (rookie), Dennis (rookie), DGB (ssp) & Duffy (cat B) would be pretty amazing. Would require a risk of trading down to Pick 6 (7 after Aschroft bid), but it could pay off.
The Adelaide-North trade watch will be very interesting and could set a chain reaction off. Also the trade makes a lot of sense for North, given Richmonds coyness for Pick #2, and safeguards against the "threat" of Melbourne at 5 for Tauru