Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Yep absolute steal by tigers

Daylight robbery

If it was 9 and not 13 it would prob look ok for port on paper at least
Richmond doing a great job of fleecing other clubs (who coincidentally have ex-Richmond coaches).
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Richmond doing a great job of fleecing other clubs (who coincidentally have ex-Richmond coaches).
Gold Coast are going to hand over all their gains from Port deal to Richmond.

Rioli fetching 2x more than Houston will sting.
 
Gold Coast are going to hand over all their gains from Port deal to Richmond.

Rioli fetching 2x more than Houston will sting.
They play by different rules with their steady stream of top Academy talents they have, will get this year and also next year. It doesn't really matter when you get top rated players every year for cents in the dollar
 
I am calling it now. There is no way Port ever win a premiership while they have this missing pieces trading strategy. Its demolishing their depth. Im honestly looking forward to next year because i predict Port will almost certainly seek permission to use every future 1st and 2nd from the new found rules to bring in more players.

It’s a sensible strategy. They can keep using draft picks for the following two years, every year, until the club folds 😁.

It’s like a person on the dole going in to cash converters to get an advance on their next dole cheque, the day after receiving and blowing their last dole cheque.
 
They’ve just traded heavily into this draft though ?

They traded a player who wanted out and the AFL probably put it as a stipulation that the Houston pick they receive couldn't be traded out for a player, because they are using next years pick for Luko. One hypothetical reason Port backed out of the deal in the first place was because they wanted to keep the future 1st but throw pick 13 at a club for another player. I wouldnt put it past them.

But I do suspect the reason they originally opted out of the trade was they recognise the need for top end talent via the draft and they want to start getting back into having 1st and 2nd round draft picks. I think there eyes were opened about the results of last years trading perhaps didnt yield the results they thought it would.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

They traded a player who wanted out and the AFL probably put it as a stipulation that the Houston pick they receive couldn't be traded out for a player, because they are using next years pick for Luko. One hypothetical reason Port backed out of the deal in the first place was because they wanted to keep the future 1st but throw pick 13 at a club for another player. I wouldnt put it past them.

But I do suspect the reason they originally opted out of the trade was they recognise the need for top end talent via the draft and they want to start getting back into having 1st and 2nd round draft picks. I think there eyes were opened about the results of last years trading perhaps didnt yield the results they thought it would.
They definitely were desperate to get into this years draft like alot of clubs , maybe too desperate in the end
 
It’s a sensible strategy. They can keep using draft picks for the following two years, every year, until the club folds 😁.

It’s like a person on the dole going in to cash converters to get an advance on their next dole cheque, the day after receiving and blowing their last dole cheque.

If there were no rules around trading, Port would have no draft picks at all.
 
It’s a fine line and when you telegraph your intentions too much it bites you on the arse as we’ve seen previously
It would have worked better if they were happier to miss out on the draft if it came to that

But they were desperate to get involved

It’s very interesting and kind of opposite to us this draft , we’ve basically traded out ( other than pick 4 )

Will be interesting to see how it pans out for both clubs , we won’t know for 3-5 years
 
It would have worked better if they were happier to miss out on the draft if it came to that

But they were desperate to get involved

It’s very interesting and kind of opposite to us this draft , we’ve basically traded out ( other than pick 4 )

Will be interesting to see how it pans out for both clubs , we won’t know for 3-5 years
I reckon we’ve taken the view we need experience as they’ve blamed inexperience and lack of depth for our 2023.

The other issue is our list is so tight that we’ve hamstrung ourselves which I don’t get for a rebuilding side.

Whereas Port keep giving away draft picks to attract missing pieces they’ve had to go back to the draft, plus their depth sucks.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour 2024 Rumours and Speculation Part 3


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top