List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part II

[Lomas]

It’s nauseating because knowing our crap luck No 2 turns out to be a clone of Lachy Neale

I agree with you 100 percent, but reserve the right to agree likewise with an equal and opposite post in approximately four and a half minutes.

 

[Lomas]

Your missing my cunning plan regarding protecting Boomers record

Baldrick esque

 

[The Talent Scout]

Hypothetical again..

In the near to impossible chance Houston does land.

Is it grim days for the likes of

Goater (obvs with injury anyway), Bergman (hasn’t don’t too much), Fisher (does he go forward) leaving maybe Hardeman as the developing HB type?

No. We have big wraps on Josh, Bergman has had some injuries, he's fine, we just got fisher, and Riley we got with a first rounder, so he's highly rated, its not grim days for any of them, just the opposite, will make them work harder and they know to make the senior team now that they really do have to go to that next level in fitness and performance.

 

[Twangler]

What would people rather future first for Houston and future second

Or Caleb Daniel for a future third

The former. Houston is a significantly better player and unlike Daniel can actually defend as well.

If Houston falls through I’d be very happy with Daniel as a back up plan especially if it’s a F3

 

[The Talent Scout]

I’m flip flopping on this so much that I’m dizzy.

 

[The Nostradamus]

The former. Houston is a significantly better player and unlike Daniel can actually defend as well.

If Houston falls through I’d be very happy with Daniel as a back up plan especially if it’s a F3

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

 

[GS WARRIORS]

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

No team would make that trade.

 

[Twangler]

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

I’d go Sharp if it really was to be Sharp. But it won’t be. If we get Houston and Parker we aren’t finishing in the bottom 4. If we’re a chance for a player at Houstans calibre we should be doing all we can to get him across (excluding pick 2 this year).

We can’t lose sight of what matters and that’s winning games if football. Houston helps us do that. We can’t afford another year bottom 2.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

How many years is it we’re desperate to keep a future first in case it is a top 2 pick before it gets really sad?

I had a bet with myself it was last year.

 

[The Nostradamus]

No team would make that trade.

Correct

Which is why we shouldn’t even be contemplating putting our future first up unless it’s a young gun under 23

 

[The Nostradamus]

I’d go Sharp if it really was to be Sharp. But it won’t be. If we get Houston and Parker we aren’t finishing in the bottom 4. If we’re a chance for a player at Houstans calibre we should be doing all we can to get him across (excluding pick 2 this year).

You can replace sharp with any of Duursma, greeves, ludowyke, Onley

The answer is the same you take them over Houston

 

[Shermanator]

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

When can some people understand if we end up with the opportunity to recruit Sharp or Duursma next year then we’ve finished bottom 2.. AGAIN!

**** that, let’s start winning games instead of cranking ourselves over a shinny new pick 2 every ****ing year..

I’m bloody sick of losing. Bring in some experienced tough nuts in Parker (for free) and Houston (for a fee) fit the bill perfectly at the development stage we’re at.

Get some wins, get the 2025 FA’s looking at us as club on the rise and get bigger names for no draft capital next year.

If we don’t start winning soon we will be stuck on this treadmill of shittiness forever..

 

[The Nostradamus]

When can some people understand if we end up with the opportunity to recruit Sharp or Duursma next year then we’ve finished bottom 2.. AGAIN!

**** that, let’s start winning games instead of cranking ourselves over a shinny new pick 2 every ****ing year..

I’m bloody sick of losing. Bring in some experienced tough nuts in Parker (for free) and Houston (for a fee) fit the bill perfectly at the development stage we’re at.

Get some wins, get the 2025 FA’s looking at us as club on the rise and get bigger names for no draft capital next year.

If we don’t start winning soon we will be stuck on this treadmill of shittiness forever..

Refer to my above post I’m taking the other highly rated guns next year

Now if we are talking someone like SDK then I’d be open to trading it

 

[Twangler]

You can replace sharp with any of Duursma, greeves, ludowyke, Onley

The answer is the same you take them over Houston

I refer to the post above from Sherm. Also a year away is a long time. Some of thee names you mentioned might not even be top twenty next year. I’d back Houston being a better player than next years 5-8 which is the pick I expect us to have.

 

[The Nostradamus]

The way to get Houston is to split pick 2

The only way you trade the future first is if they include Ollie lord in the deal

 

[Junk yard]

Let me put it this way then Dyson Sharp/ Willem Duursma for Houston and a future second?

One in the hand is worth two in the bush brother.

 

[Junk yard]

When can some people understand if we end up with the opportunity to recruit Sharp or Duursma next year then we’ve finished bottom 2.. AGAIN!

**** that, let’s start winning games instead of cranking ourselves over a shinny new pick 2 every ****ing year..

I’m bloody sick of losing. Bring in some experienced tough nuts in Parker (for free) and Houston (for a fee) fit the bill perfectly at the development stage we’re at.

Get some wins, get the 2025 FA’s looking at us as club on the rise and get bigger names for no draft capital next year.

If we don’t start winning soon we will be stuck on this treadmill of shittiness forever..

And players will start to leave. Our retention of required players has been excellent for a long time but the dam wall will bust at some stage if we don't start winning.

 

[Shermanator]

And players will start to leave. Our retention of required players has been excellent for a long time but the dam wall will bust at some stage if we don't start winning.

Exactly.

We finish second last next year and we go ‘oh wow can’t wait for Dyson Sharp to join us!!’..

Meanwhile LDU (heading into his prime) is walking out the back door..

 

[The Nostradamus]

Exactly.

We finish second last next year and we go ‘oh wow can’t wait for Dyson Sharp to join us!!’..

Meanwhile LDU (heading into his prime) is walking out the back door..

No one is saying don’t get him

Get him by splitting pick 2 not by trading a future first

 

[Moti]

We aren't getting Houston without the F1 and with only something token in return.

If we get him, we should be backing in a mid table finish between 10-14.

 

[Shermanator]

No one is saying don’t get him

Get him by splitting pick 2 not by trading a future first

WTF?..

There’s plenty of people saying let’s not touch our future first..

 

[The Nostradamus]

WTF?..

There’s plenty of people saying let’s not touch our future first..

Correct

Splitting pick 2 for him is the way to go

Trading our future first is not

 

[Junk yard]

Exactly.

We finish second last next year and we go ‘oh wow can’t wait for Dyson Sharp to join us!!’..

Meanwhile LDU (heading into his prime) is walking out the back door..

And you end up like Carlton of the 2000s in perpetual rebuild.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Split 2 for 6 and 10/12 after tigers do their deals

The latter pick goes for Houston

Otherwise we walk away

None of this future first bs

 

[Pravda Roo]

Nick Daicos back?

Works for me but can't see them giving him up.